Multi-scale high-throughput phenotyping of apple architectural and functional traits in orchard reveals genotypic variability under contrasted watering regimes

Abstract

Despite previous reports on the genotypic variation of architectural and functional traits in fruit trees, phenotyping large populations in the field remains challenging. In this study, we used high-throughput phenotyping methods on an apple tree core-collection (1000 individuals) grown under contrasted watering regimes. First, architectural phenotyping was achieved using T-LiDAR scans for estimating convex and alpha hull volumes and the silhouette to total leaf area ratio (STAR). Second, a semi-empirical index (I_PL) was computed from chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, as a proxy for leaf photosynthesis. Last, thermal infrared and multispectral airborne imaging was used for computing canopy temperature variations, water deficit, and vegetation indices. All traits estimated by these methods were compared to low-throughput in planta measurements. Vegetation indices and alpha hull volumes were significantly correlated with tree leaf area and trunk cross sectional area, while I_PL values showed strong correlations with photosynthesis measurements collected on an independent leaf dataset. By contrast, correlations between stomatal conductance and canopy temperature estimated from airborne images were lower, emphasizing discrepancies across measurement scales. High heritability values were obtained for almost all the traits except leaf photosynthesis, likely due to large intra-tree variation. Genotypic means were used in a clustering procedure that defined six classes of architectural and functional combinations. Differences between groups showed several combinations between architectural and functional traits, suggesting independent genetic controls. This study demonstrates the feasibility and relevance of combining multi-scale high-throughput methods and paves the way to explore the genetic bases of architectural and functional variations in woody crops in field conditions.

References

[1] Monteith, J. L. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 277-294 (1977).

[2] Laurens, F. et al. An integrated approach for increasing breeding efficiency in apple and peach in Europe. Hortic. Res. 1, 5-11 (2018).

[3] Coupel-Ledru, A. et al. Reduced nighttime transpiration is a relevant breeding target for high water-use efficiency in grapevine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 8963-8968 (2016).

[4] Lopez, G. et al. Genetic variation of morphological traits and transpiration in an apple core collection under well-watered conditions: Towards the identification of morphotypes with high water use efficiency. PLoS ONE 10, e0145540 (2015).

[5] Cabrera‐Bosquet, L. et al. High‐throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation‐use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. New Phytol. 212, 269-281 (2016).

[6] Liebhard, R., Kellerhals, M., Pfammatter, W., Jertmini, M. & Gessler, C. Mapping quantitative physiological traits in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 511-526 (2003).

[7] Segura, V., Cilas, C. & Costes, E. Dissecting apple tree architecture into genetic, ontogenetic and environmental effects: mixed linear modelling of repeated spatial and temporal measures. New Phytol. 178, 302-314 (2008).

[8] Massonnet, C., Regnard, J. L., Lauri, P. É., Costes, E. & Sinoquet, H . Contributions of foliage distribution and leaf functions to light interception, transpiration and photosynthetic capacities in two apple cultivars at branch and tree scales. Tree Physiol. 28, 665-678 (2008).

[9] Dassot, M., Constant, T. & Fournier, M. The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges. Ann. For. Sci. 68, 959-974 (2011).

[10] Moorthy, I. et al. Field characterization of olive (Olea europaea L.) tree crown architecture using terrestrial laser scanning data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151, 204-214 (2011).

[11] Hosoi, F. & Omasa, K. Factors contributing to accuracy in the estimation of the woody canopy leaf area density profile using 3D portable lidar imaging. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 3463-3473 (2007).

[12] Dong, W., Roy, P. & Isler, V. Semantic mapping for orchard environments by merging two-sides reconstructions of tree rows. arXiv:1809.00075 [cs] (2018).

[13] Murchie, E. H. & Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3983-3998 (2013).

[14] Baker, N. R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 89-113 (2008).

[15] Poormohammad Kiani, S., Maury, P., Sarrafi, A. & Grieu, P. QTL analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant Sci. 175, 565-573 (2008).

[16] Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B. & Medrano, H. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 461-471 (2002).

[17] Losciale, P. et al. A multivariate approach for assessing leaf photo-assimilation performance using the IPL index. Physiol. Plant. 154, 609-620 (2015).

[18] Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S. & Cairns, J. E. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 451-466 (2018).

[19] Rebetzke, G. J. et al. Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 14-33 (2013).

[20] Condorelli, G. E. et al. Comparative aerial and ground based high throughput phenotyping for the genetic dissection of NDVI as a proxy for drought adaptive traits in durum wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 893 (2018).

[21] Virlet, N. et al. Stress indicators based on airborne thermal imagery for field phenotyping a heterogeneous tree population for response to water constraints. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5429-5442 (2014).

[22] Virlet, N., Costes, E., Martinez, S., Kelner, J. -J. & Regnard, J. -L. Multispectral airborne imagery in the field reveals genetic determinisms of morphological and transpiration traits of an apple tree hybrid population in response to water deficit. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5453-5465 (2015).

[23] Rouse, J. W. Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. Third ERTS Symp. 1, 309-317 (1974).

[24] Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J. & Merzlyak, M. N. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 58, 289-298 (1996).

[25] Haboudane, D., Miller, J. R., Pattey, E., Zarco-Tejada, P. J. & Strachan, I. B. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 90, 337-352 (2004).

[26] Gamon, J. A., Peñuelas, J. & Field, C. B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens. Environ. 41, 35-44 (1992).

[27] Lassois, L. et al. Genetic diversity, population structure, parentage analysis, and construction of core collections in the french apple germplasm based on SSR Markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 34, 827-844 (2016).

[28] Gómez-Candón, D., Virlet, N., Labbé, S., Jolivot, A. & Regnard, J.-L. Field phenotyping of water stress at tree scale by UAV-sensed imagery: new insights for thermal acquisition and calibration. Precis. Agric. 17, 786-800 (2016).

[29] Jones, H. G. Use of thermography for quantitative studies of spatial and temporal variation of stomatal conductance over leaf surfaces. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1043-1055 (1999).

[30] Moran, M. S., Clarke, T. R., Inoue, Y. & Vidal, A. Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index. Remote Sens. Environ. 49, 246-263 (1994).

[31] Pradal, C., Boudon, F., Nouguier, C., Chopard, J. & Godin, C. PlantGL: A Python-based geometric library for 3D plant modelling at different scales. Graph. Models 71, 1-21 (2009).

[32] Pradal, C., Dufour-Kowalski, S., Boudon, F., Fournier, C. & Godin, C. OpenAlea: a visual programming and component-based software platform for plant modelling. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 751-760 (2008).

[33] R Development Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).

[34] Sinoquet, H., Roux, X. L., Adam, B., Ameglio, T. & Daudet, F. A. RATP: a model for simulating the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: application to an isolated tree crown. Plant, Cell &. Environment 24, 395-406 (2001).

[35] Strong, D. & Azarenko, A. N. Relationship between trunk cross-sectional area, harvest index, total tree dry weight and yield components of ‘Starkspur Supreme Delicious’ apple trees. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 54, 22-27 (2000).

[36] Da Silva, D., Han, L. & Costes, E. Light interception efficiency of apple trees: A multiscale computational study based on MAppleT. Ecol. Model. 290, 45-53 (2014).

[37] Reynolds, D. et al. What is cost-efficient phenotyping? Optimizing costs for different scenarios. Plant Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. plantsci.2018.06.015

[38] Inostroza, L. et al. Using aerial images and canopy spectral reflectance for high-throughput phenotyping of white clover. Crop Sci. 56, 2629-2637 (2016).

[39] Ludovisi, R. et al. UAV-based thermal imaging for high-throughput field phenotyping of black poplar response to drought. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1681 (2017).

[40] Zufferey, V., Cochard, H., Ameglio, T., Spring, J. -L. & Viret, O. Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3885-3894 (2011).

[41] Gonzalez-Dugo, V. et al. Almond tree canopy temperature reveals intra-crown variability that is water stress-dependent. Agric. For. Meteorol. 154-155, 156-165 (2012).

[42] Gonzalez-Dugo, V. et al. Using high resolution UAV thermal imagery to assess the variability in the water status of five fruit tree species within a commercial orchard. Precis. Agric. 14, 660-678 (2013).

[43] Ballester, C. et al. Evaluating the performance of xanthophyll, chlorophyll and structure-sensitive spectral indices to detect water stress in five fruit tree species. Precis. Agric. 19, 178-193 (2018).

[44] Körner, C. Paradigm shift in plant growth control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 107-114 (2015).

[45] Poirier-Pocovi, M., Lothier, J. & Buck-Sorlin, G. Modelling temporal variation of parameters used in two photosynthesis models: influence of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in fruit-bearing branches of apple. Ann. Bot. 121, 821-832 (2018).

[46] Bianco, L. et al. Development and validation of the Axiom®Apple480K SNP genotyping array. Plant J. 86, 62-74 (2016).

[47] Urrestarazu, J. et al. Genome-wide association mapping of flowering and ripening periods in apple. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1923 (2017).

[48] Xu, Y., Li, P., Yang, Z. & Xu, C. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops. The Crop J 5, 175-184 (2017).

[49] Cubero, S., Aleixos, N., Moltó, E., Gómez-Sanchis, J. & Blasco, J. Advances in machine vision applications for automatic inspection and quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables. Food Bioprocess Technol. 4, 487-504 (2011).

[50] Sa, I. et al. DeepFruits: A fruit detection system using deep neural networks. Sensors 16, 1222 (2016).