Gibberellic acid induced parthenocarpic ‘Honeycrisp’ apples (Malus domestica) exhibit reduced ovary width and lower acidity

Kelsey D. Galimba , Daniel G. Bullock , Chris Dardick , Zhongchi Liu , Ann M. Callahan

Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 41

PDF (1545KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :41 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0124-8
Article
research-article
Gibberellic acid induced parthenocarpic ‘Honeycrisp’ apples (Malus domestica) exhibit reduced ovary width and lower acidity
Author information +
History +
PDF (1545KB)

Abstract

Fruit set and development are dependent on auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin, which cause parthenocarpic development in many species when applied ectopically. Commercial sprays containing these hormones are used to improve apple fruit set, size, and shape, but have been implicated negatively in other aspects of fruit quality. We applied gibberellic acid (GA3), synthetic auxin (NAA), and the auxin-transport inhibitor NPA to ‘Honeycrisp’ apple flowers. Fruit retention and size were quantified throughout development, and seed number and fruit quality parameters were measured at maturity. GA3 alone caused the development of seedless parthenocarpic apples. At maturity, GA3-treated apples were narrower due to reduced ovary width, indicating that GA3 induced normal growth of the hypanthium, but not the ovary. GA3-treated fruits were also less acidic than hand-pollinated controls, but had similar firmness, starch, and sugar content. To further understand the regulation of parthenocarpy, we performed tissue-specific transcriptome analysis on GA3-treated, NAA-treated, and control fruits, at 18 days after treatment and again at maturity. Overall, transcriptome analysis showed GA3-treated and hand-pollinated fruits were highly similar in RNA expression profiles. Early expression differences in putative cell division, cytokinin degradation, and cell wall modification genes in GA3-treated ovaries correlated with the observed shape differences, while early expression differences in the acidity gene Ma1 may be responsible for the changes in pH. Taken together, our results indicate that GA3 triggers the development of parthenocarpic apple fruit with morphological deviations that correlate with a number of candidate gene expression differences.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kelsey D. Galimba, Daniel G. Bullock, Chris Dardick, Zhongchi Liu, Ann M. Callahan. Gibberellic acid induced parthenocarpic ‘Honeycrisp’ apples (Malus domestica) exhibit reduced ovary width and lower acidity. Horticulture Research, 2019, 6 (1) : 41 DOI:10.1038/s41438-019-0124-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Pandolfini, T., Molesini, B. & Spena, A. Molecular dissection of the role of auxin in fruit initiation. Trends Plant. Sci. 12, 327-329 (2007).

[2]

Alabadí, D., Blázquez, M. A., Carbonell, J., Ferrándiz, C. & Pérez-Amador, M. A. Instructive roles for hormones in plant development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 1597-1608 (2009).

[3]

Kumar, R., Khurana, A. & Sharma, A. K. Role of plant hormones and their interplay in development and ripening of fleshy fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4561-4575 (2014).

[4]

Sotelo-Silveira, M., Marsch-Martínez, N. & Folter, Sde Unraveling the signal scenario of fruit set. Planta. 239, 1147-1158 (2014).

[5]

Joldersma, D. & Liu, Z. The making of virgin fruit: the molecular and genetic basis of parthenocarpy. J. Exp. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx446 (2018).

[6]

Dorcey, E., Urbez, C., Blázquez, M. A., Carbonell, J. & Perez-Amador, M. A. Fertilization-dependent auxin response in ovules triggers fruit development through the modulation of gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 58, 318-332 (2009).

[7]

Vivian-Smith, A. & Koltunow, A. M. Genetic analysis of growth-regulator-induced parthenocarpy in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 121, 437-452 (1999).

[8]

Marsch-Martínez, N. et al. The role of cytokinin during Arabidopsis gynoecia and fruit morphogenesis and patterning. Plant J. 72, 222-234 (2012).

[9]

Marsch-Martínez, N. & de Folter, S. Hormonal control of the development of the gynoecium. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 29, 104-114 (2016).

[10]

Coombe, B. G. Relationship of growth and development to changes in sugars, auxins, and gibberellins in fruit of seeded and seedless varieties of Vitis Vinifera. Plant Physiol. 35, 241-250 (1960).

[11]

Kang, C. et al. Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into early-stage fruit development in woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Cell 25, 1960-1978 (2013).

[12]

Mariotti, L., Picciarelli, P., Lombardi, L. & Ceccarelli, N. Fruit-set and early fruit growth in tomato are associated with increases in indoleacetic acid, cytokinin, and bioactive gibberellin contents. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 30, 405 (2011).

[13]

Eccher, G., Ferrero, S., Populin, F., Colombo, L. & Botton, A. Apple (Malus domestica L. Borkh) as an emerging model for fruit development . Plant Biosyst. - Int. J. Deal. Asp. Plant Biol. 148, 157-168 (2014).

[14]

Dennis, F. G. Apple fruit-set: evidence for a specific role of seeds. Science 156, 71-73 (1967).

[15]

Greene, D. W. University of M. Gibberellins A4+7 influence fruit set, fruit quality, and return bloom of apples. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. USA 114, 619-625 (1989).

[16]

McArtney, S., Greene, D., Robinson, T. & Wargo, J. Evaluation of GA4+7 plus 6-benzyladenine as a frost-rescue treatment for apple. Horttechnology 24, 171-176 (2014).

[17]

Schmidt, T. R., Elfving, D. C., McFerson, J. R. & Whiting, M. D. Gibberellic acid accelerates ‘honeycrisp’, but not ‘cameo’, apple fruit maturation. Horttechnology 18, 39-44 (2008).

[18]

Stylianidis, D. K., Sotiropoulos, T. E., Vogiatzis, D., Therios, I. & Koukourikou-Petridou, M. The effect of growth regulators on fruit shape and inorganic nutrient concentration in leaves and fruit of ‘Red Delicious’ apples. J. Biol. Res. 1, 75-80 (2004).

[19]

Unrath, C. R. The commercial implications of gibberellin A4A7 plus benzyladenine for improving shape and yield of ‘delicious’ apples. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 99, 381-384 (1974).

[20]

Watanabe, M., Segawa, H., Murakami, M., Sagawa, S. & Komori, S. Effects of plant growth regulators on fruit set and fruit shape of parthenocarpic apple fruits. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 77, 350-357 (2008).

[21]

Valent Agricultural Products . Promalin plant growth regulator (2016). https://www.valent.com/agriculture/products/promalin/. Accessed on 17 May 2017.

[22]

Good Fruit Grower. Good to Know: Promalin as a frost rescue for apples. Good Fruit Grower. http://www.goodfruit.com/good-to-know-promalin-as-a-frost-rescue-for-apples/. (Accessed 17 May 2017).

[23]

Roper, T. R. Plant growth regulator use in apples. (2005). https://hort.extension.wisc.edu/articles/plant-growth-regulator-use-in-apples/.

[24]

DeEll, J., Khanizadeh, S., Saad, F. & Ferree, D. Factors affecting apple fruit firmness: a review. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 55, 8-27 (2001).

[25]

Bai, Y. et al. A natural mutation-led truncation in one of the two aluminum-activated malate transporter-like genes at the Ma locus is associated with low fruit acidity in apple. Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG 287, 663-678 (2012).

[26]

van der Knaap, E. et al. What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 227 (2014).

[27]

Stern, A. R., Ben-Arie, R., Applebaum, S. & Flaishman, M. Cytokinins increase fruit size of ‘Delicious’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ (Malus domestica) apple in a warm climate . J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 81, 51-56 (2006).

[28]

Stern, R. A. & Flaishman, M. A. Benzyladenine effects on fruit size, fruit thinning and return yield of ‘Spadona’ and ‘Coscia’ pear. Sci. Hortic. 98, 499-504 (2003).

[29]

Malladi, A. & Johnson, L. K. Expression profiling of cell cycle genes reveals key facilitators of cell production during carpel development, fruit set, and fruit growth in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.) . J. Exp. Bot. 62, 205-219 (2011).

[30]

Wu, S., Xiao, H., Cabrera, A., Meulia, T. & van der Knaap, E. SUN regulates vegetative and reproductive organ shape by changing cell division patterns1 [C][W][OA]. Plant Physiol. 157, 1175-1186 (2011).

[31]

Luby, J. & Bedford, D. S. Apple tree: honeycrisp. USPP7197 P (1990). https://patents.google.com/patent/USPP7197P/en.

[32]

Gallardo, R. K., Hanrahan, I., Hong, Y. A. & Luby, J. J. Crop load management and the market profitability of ‘honeycrisp’ apples. Horttechnology 25, 575-584 (2015).

[33]

Roeder, A. H. K. & Yanofsky, M. F. Fruit development in Arabidopsis. Arab. Book e0075 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0075

[34]

Jackson, D. I. & Coombe, B. G. The growth of apricot fruit. II. The effects of temperature and gibberellic acid. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 18, 95-106 (1967).

[35]

Xu, K. Study reveals identity of the apple acidity gene. Fruit Growers News. https://fruitgrowersnews.com/news/study-reveals-identity-of-the-apple-acidity-gene/. (2012) (Accessed 27 November 2017)

[36]

Bai, Y., Dougherty, L., Cheng, L., Zhong, G.-Y. & Xu, K. Uncovering co-expression gene network modules regulating fruit acidity in diverse apples. BMC Genomics 16, 612 (2015).

[37]

Blanpied, G. D. & Silsby, K. J. Predicting harvest date windows for apples. (1992). https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/3299.

[38]

Daccord, N. et al. High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat. Genet. 49, 1099-1106 (2017).

[39]

Thimm, O. et al. mapman: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914-939 (2004).

[40]

Lohse, M. et al. Mercator: a fast and simple web server for genome scale functional annotation of plant sequence data. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1250-1258 (2014).

[41]

Karlgren, A., Carlsson, J., Gyllenstrand, N., Lagercrantz, U. & Sundström, J. F. Non-radioactive in situ hybridization protocol applicable for norway spruce and a range of plant species. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. https://doi.org/10.3791/1205 (2009).

[42]

Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671-675 (2012).

[43]

Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

PDF (1545KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/