Diversity and redundancy of the ripening regulatory networks revealed by the fruitENCODE and the new CRISPR/Cas9 CNR and NOR mutants

Abstract

Tomato is considered as the genetic model for climacteric fruits, in which three major players control the fruit ripening process: ethylene, ripening transcription factors, and DNA methylation. The fruitENCODE project has now shown that there are multiple transcriptional circuits regulating fruit ripening in different species, and H3K27me3, instead of DNA methylation, plays a conserved role in restricting these ripening pathways. In addition, the function of the core tomato ripening transcription factors is now being questioned. We have employed CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to mutate the SBP-CNR and NAC-NOR transcription factors, both of which are considered as master regulators in the current tomato ripening model. These plants only displayed delayed or partial non-ripening phenotypes, distinct from the original mutant plants, which categorically failed to ripen, suggesting that they might be gain-of-function mutants. Besides increased DNA methylation genome-wide, the original mutants also have hyper-H3K27me3 in ripening gene loci such as ACS2, RIN, and TDR4. It is most likely that multiple genetic and epigenetic factors have contributed to their strong non-ripening phenotypes. Hence, we propose that the field should move beyond these linear and two-dimensional models and embrace the fact that important biological processes such as ripening are often regulated by highly redundant network with inputs from multiple levels.

References

[1] Coombe, B. G. The development of fleshy fruits. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27, 207-228 (1976).

[2] Tiffney, B. H. Vertebrate dispersal of seed plants through time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 35, 1-29 (2004).

[3] Klee, H. J. & Giovannoni, J. J. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 41-59 (2011).

[4] Zhong, S. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 154-159 (2013).

[5] Lu, P. T. et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat. Plants 4, 784-791 (2018).

[6] Ito, Y. et al. Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nat. Plants 3, 866-874 (2017).

[7] Giovannoni, J., Nguyen, C., Ampofo, B., Zhong, S. L. & Fei, Z. J. The epigenome and transcriptional dynamics of fruit ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 68, 61-84 (2017).

[8] Li, S. et al. The RIN-MC fusion of MADS-Box transcription factors has transcriptional activity and modulates expression of many ripening genes. Plant Physiol. 176, 891-909 (2018).

[9] Lelievre, J. M., Latche, A., Jones, B., Bouzayen, M . & Pech, J. C. Ethylene and fruit ripening. Physiol. Plant. 101, 727-739 (1997).

[10] Alexander, L. & Grierson, D. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2039-2055 (2002).

[11] Giovannoni, J. J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16, S170-S180 (2004).

[12] Vrebalov, J. et al. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science 296, 343-346 (2002).

[13] Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948-952 (2006).

[14] McMurchie, E. J., McGlasson, W. B. & Eaks, I. L. Treatment of fruit with propylene gives information about the biogenesis of ethylene. Nature 237, 235-236 (1972).

[15] Martel, C., Vrebalov, J., Tafelmeyer, P. & Giovannoni, J. J. The tomato MADS-Box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 157, 1568-1579 (2011).

[16] Fujisawa, M., Nakano, T. & Ito, Y. Identification of potential target genes for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 26 (2011).

[17] Wang, K. L. C., Li, H. & Ecker, J. R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 14, S131-S151 (2002).

[18] Schwartz, Y. B. & Pirrotta, V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 9-22 (2007).

[19] He, Y. H. Chromatin regulation of flowering. Trends Plant. Sci. 17, 556-562 (2012).

[20] Chen, W. W. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for somatic inheritance of the spontaneous tomato epimutation colourless non-ripening. Sci. Rep. 5, 9192 (2015).

[21] Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497-1502 (2007).

[22] Gerstein, M. B. et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature 489, 91-100 (2012).

[23] Yan, J. et al. Transcription factor binding in human cells occurs in dense clusters formed around cohesin anchor sites. Cell 154, 801-813 (2013).

[24] Sato, S. et al. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635-641 (2012).

[25] Kou, X. H., Watkins, C. B. & Gan, S. S. Arabidopsis AtNAP regulates fruit senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 6139-6147 (2012).

[26] Bird, A. P. Cpg-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321, 209-213 (1986).

[27] Hsieh, T. F. et al. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 324, 1451-1454 (2009).

[28] Liu, R. et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10804-10809 (2015).

[29] Lang, Z. et al. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E4511-E4519 (2017).

[30] Harris, C. J. et al. A DNA methylation reader complex that enhances gene transcription. Science 362, 1182 (2018).

[31] Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75-82 (2012).