A NAC transcription factor, NOR-like1, is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening

Abstract

Ripening of the model fruit tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is controlled by a transcription factor network including NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) domain proteins such as No-ripening (NOR), SlNAC1, and SlNAC4, but very little is known about the NAC targets or how they regulate ripening. Here, we conducted a systematic search of fruit-expressed NAC genes and showed that silencing NOR-like1 (Solyc07g063420) using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) inhibited specific aspects of ripening. Ripening initiation was delayed by 14 days when NOR-like1 function was inactivated by CRISPR/Cas9 and fruits showed obviously reduced ethylene production, retarded softening and chlorophyll loss, and reduced lycopene accumulation. RNA-sequencing profiling and gene promoter analysis suggested that genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis (SlACS2, SlACS4), color formation (SlGgpps2, SlSGR1), and cell wall metabolism (SlPG2a, SlPL, SlCEL2, and SlEXP1) are direct targets of NOR-like1. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR), and dual-luciferase reporter assay (DLR) confirmed that NOR-like1 bound to the promoters of these genes both in vitro and in vivo, and activated their expression. Our findings demonstrate that NOR-like1 is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening, with an important role in the transcriptional regulatory network.

References

[1] Klee, H. J. & Giovannoni, J. J. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 41-59 (2011).

[2] Seymour, G. B., Chapman, N. H., Chew, B. L. & Rose, J. K. Regulation of ripening and opportunities for control in tomato and other fruits. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 269-278 (2013).

[3] Pesaresi, P., Mizzotti, C., Colombo, M. & Masiero, S . Genetic regulation and structural changes during tomato fruit development and ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 5, e14427 (2014).

[4] Karlova, R. et al. Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4527-4541 (2014).

[5] Giovannoni, J., Nguyen, C., Ampofo, B., Zhong, S. & Fei, Z. The epigenome and transcriptional dynamics of fruit ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 61-84 (2017).

[6] Giovannoni, J. J. Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 283-289 (2007).

[7] Vrebalov, J. et al. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science 296, 343-346 (2002).

[8] Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948-952 (2006).

[9] Ito, Y. et al. Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nat. Plants 3, 866-874 (2017).

[10] Li, S. et al. The RIN-MC fusion of MADS-Box transcription factors has transcriptional activity and modulates expression of many ripening genes. Plant Physiol. 176, 891-909 (2018).

[11] Yuan, X. Y., Wang, R. H., Zhao, X. D., Luo, Y. B. & Fu, D. Q. Role of the Tomato non-ripening mutation in regulating fruit quality elucidated using iTRAQ protein profile analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0164335 (2016).

[12] Kumar, R., Tamboli, V., Sharma, R. & Sreelakshmi, Y. NAC-NOR mutations in tomato Penjar accessions attenuate multiple metabolic processes and prolong the fruit shelf life. Food Chem. 259, 234-244 (2018).

[13] Itkin, M. et al. TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 is a component of the fruit ripening regulatory network. Plant J. 60, 1081-1095 (2009).

[14] Vrebalov, J. et al. Fleshy fruit expansion and ripening are regulated by the tomato SHATTERPROOF gene TAGL1. Plant Cell 21, 3041-3062 (2009).

[15] Bemer, M. et al. The tomato FRUITFULL homologs TDR4/FUL1 and MBP7/FUL2 regulate ethylene-independent aspects of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 24, 4437-4451 (2012).

[16] Fujisawa, M. et al. Transcriptional regulation of fruit ripening by tomato FRUITFULL homologs and associated MADS box proteins. Plant Cell 26, 89-101 (2014).

[17] Dong, T. et al. A tomato MADS-box transcription factor, SlMADS1, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 163, 1026-1036 (2013).

[18] Karlova, R. et al. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling show that APETALA2a is a major regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell 23, 923-941 (2011).

[19] Lin, Z. et al. A tomato HD-Zip homeobox protein, LeHB-1, plays an important role in floral organogenesis and ripening. Plant J. 55, 301-310 (2008).

[20] Olsen, A. N. et al. NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 79-87 (2005).

[21] Ma, X. et al. The NAC transcription factor SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato. Plant Physiol. 177, 1286-1302 (2018).

[22] Giovannoni, J. J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16, S170-S180 (2004).

[23] Ma, N. et al. Overexpression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor alters fruit pigmentation and softening. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 351 (2014).

[24] Meng, C. et al. Suppression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor delays fruit ripening. J. Plant Physiol. 193, 88-96 (2016).

[25] Zhu, M. et al. A new tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) transcription factor, SlNAC4, functions as a positive regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 119-135 (2014).

[26] Malley, O.R.C. et al. Cistrome and epicistrome features shape the regulatory DNA landscape. Cell 165, 1280-1292 (2016).

[27] Giovannoni, J . Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 725-749 (2001).

[28] Tucker, G. et al. Ethylene and fruit softening. Food Qual. Saf. 1, 253-267 (2017).

[29] Wang, D., Yeats, T. H., Uluisik, S., Rose, J. & Seymour, G. B. Fruit softening: revisiting the role of pectin. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 302-310 (2018).

[30] Han, Q. Q., Song, Y. Z., Zhang, J. Y. & Liu, L. F. Studies on the role of the SlNAC3 gene in regulating seed development in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Hortic. Sci. Biol. Technol. 89, 423-429 (2014).

[31] Kunieda, T. et al. NAC family proteins NARS1/NAC2 and NARS2/NAM in the outer integument regulate embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 2631-2642 (2008).

[32] McMurchie, E. J., McGlasson, W. B. & Eaks, I. L. Treatment of fruit with propylene gives information about the biogenesis of ethylene. Nature 237, 235-236 (1972).

[33] Barry, C. S., Llop-Tous, M. I. & Grierson, D. The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato. Plant Physiol. 123, 979-986 (2000).

[34] Yokotani, N. et al. Ripening-associated ethylene biosynthesis in tomato fruit is autocatalytically and developmentally regulated. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 3433-3442 (2009).

[35] Oeller, P. W., Lu, M. W., Taylor, L. P., Pike, D. A. & Theologis, A. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science 254, 437-439 (1991).

[36] Lincoln, J. E. et al. LE-ACS4, a fruit ripening and wound-induced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Expression in Escherichia coli, structural characterization, expression characteristics, and phylogenetic analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19422-19430 (1993).

[37] Alexander, L. & Grierson, D. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2039-2055 (2002).

[38] Fujisawa, M., Nakano, T., Shima, Y. & Ito, Y. A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 25, 371-386 (2013).

[39] Fraser, P. D. et al. Manipulation of phytoene levels in tomato fruit: effects on isoprenoids, plastids, and intermediary metabolism. Plant Cell 19, 3194-3211 (2007).

[40] Giuliano, G. et al. Metabolic engineering of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 26, 139-145 (2008).

[41] Hörtensteiner, S. Stay-green regulates chlorophyll and chlorophyll-binding protein degradation during senescence. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 155-162 (2009).

[42] Hu, Z. L. et al. Silencing of the LeSGR1 gene in tomato inhibits chlorophyll degradation and exhibits a stay-green phenotype. Biol. Plant 55, 27-34 (2011).

[43] Luo, Z. et al. A STAY-GREEN protein SlSGR1 regulates lycopene and beta-carotene accumulation by interacting directly with SlPSY1 during ripening processes in tomato. New Phytol. 198, 442-452 (2013).

[44] Brummell, D. A. et al. Modification of expansin protein abundance in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabolism during ripening. Plant Cell 11, 2203-2216 (1999).

[45] Cosgrove, D. J. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407, 321-326 (2000).

[46] Uluisik, S. et al. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 950-952 (2016).

[47] Smith, D. L., Abbott, J. A. & Gross, K. C. Down-regulation of tomato beta-galactosidase 4 results in decreased fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 129, 1755-1762 (2002).

[48] Giovannoni, J. J., DellaPenna, D., Bennett, A. B. & Fischer, R. L. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell 1, 53-63 (1989).

[49] Tieman, D. M. & Handa, A. K. Reduction in pectin methylesterase activity modifies tissue integrity and cation levels in ripening tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits. Plant Physiol. 106, 429-436 (1994).

[50] Rose, J. K. & Bennett, A. B. Cooperative disassembly of the cellulose-xyloglucan network of plant cell walls: parallels between cell expansion and fruit ripening. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 176-183 (1999).

[51] Minoia, S. et al. Induced mutations in tomato SlExp1 alter cell wall metabolism and delay fruit softening. Plant Sci. 242, 195-202 (2016).

[52] Rose, J. K., Lee, H. H. & Bennett, A. B. Expression of a divergent expansin gene is fruit-specific and ripening-regulated. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5955-5960 (1997).

[53] Saladie, M., Rose, J. K., Cosgrove, D. J. & Catala, C. Characterization of a new xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) from ripening tomato fruit and implications for the diverse modes of enzymic action. Plant J. 47, 282-295 (2006).

[54] Brummell, D. A., Hall, B. D. & Bennett, A. B. Antisense suppression of tomato endo-1,4-beta-glucanase Cel2 mRNA accumulation increases the force required to break fruit abscission zones but does not affect fruit softening. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 615-622 (1999).

[55] Nicholass, F. J., Smith, C. J., Schuch, W., Bird, C. R. & Grierson, D. High levels of ripening-specific reporter gene expression directed by tomato fruit polygalacturonase gene-flanking regions. Plant Mol. Biol. 28, 423-435 (1995).

[56] Sitrit, Y. & Bennett, A. B. Regulation of tomato fruit polygalacturonase mRNA accumulation by ethylene: a re-examination. Plant Physiol. 116, 1145-1150 (1998).

[57] Zegzouti, H. et al. Ethylene-regulated gene expression in tomato fruit: characterization of novel ethylene-responsive and ripening-related genes isolated by differential display. Plant J. 18, 589-600 (1999).

[58] Lu, C., Zainal, Z., Tucker, G. A. & Lycett, G. W. Developmental abnormalities and reduced fruit softening in tomato plants expressing an antisense Rab11 GTPase gene. Plant Cell 13, 1819-1833 (2001).

[59] Liu, Y., Schiff, M. & Dinesh-Kumar, S. P. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J. 31, 777-786 (2002).

[60] Fu, D., Zhu, B., Zhu, H., Jiang, W. & Luo, Y. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato fruit. Plant J. 43, 299-308 (2005).

[61] Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).

[62] Luo, D. et al. Involvement of WRKY transcription factors in abscisic-acid-induced cold tolerance of banana fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65, 3627-3635 (2017).

[63] Ma, X. et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).

[64] Van Eck, J., Kirk, D. D. & Walmsley, A. M. Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Methods Mol. Biol. 343, 459-473 (2006).

[65] Wang, W., Vignani, R., Scali, M. & Cresti, M. A universal and rapid protocol for protein extraction from recalcitrant plant tissues for proteomic analysis. Electrophoresis 27, 2782-2786 (2006).

[66] Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).

[67] Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 (2010).

[68] Breitel, D. A. et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 intersects hormonal signals in the regulation of tomato fruit ripening. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005903 (2016).

[69] Hao, Y. et al. Auxin response factor SlARF2 is an essential component of the regulatory mechanism controlling fruit ripening in tomato. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005649 (2015).

[70] Fantini, E., Falcone, G., Frusciante, S., Giliberto, L. & Giuliano, G . Dissection of tomato lycopene biosynthesis through virus-induced gene silencing. Plant Physiol. 163, 986-998 (2013).

[71] Wu, T. X. & Abbott, J. A. Firmness and force relaxation characteristics of tomatoes stored intact or as slices. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24, 59-68 (2002).

[72] Russin, W. A. & Trivett, C. L. in Microwave Techniques and Protocols (eds Giberson, R. T. & Demaree, R. S.) 25-35 (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2001).

[73] Han, Y. et al. Banana transcription factor MaERF11 recruits histone deacetylase MaHDA1 and represses the expression of MaACO1 and expansins during fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 171, 1070-1084 (2016).

[74] Hellens, R. P. et al. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant. Methods 1, 13 (2005).

[75] Sainsbury, F., Thuenemann, E. C. & Lomonossoff, G. P. pEAQ: versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 7, 682-693 (2009).