Characterization of peach tree crown by using high-resolution images from an unmanned aerial vehicle

Yue Mu , Yuichiro Fujii , Daisuke Takata , Bangyou Zheng , Koji Noshita , Kiyoshi Honda , Seishi Ninomiya , Wei Guo

Horticulture Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 74

PDF (10466KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :74 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-018-0097-z
Article
research-article
Characterization of peach tree crown by using high-resolution images from an unmanned aerial vehicle
Author information +
History +
PDF (10466KB)

Abstract

In orchards, measuring crown characteristics is essential for monitoring the dynamics of tree growth and optimizing farm management. However, it lacks a rapid and reliable method of extracting the features of trees with an irregular crown shape such as trained peach trees. Here, we propose an efficient method of segmenting the individual trees and measuring the crown width and crown projection area (CPA) of peach trees with time-series information, based on gathered images. The images of peach trees were collected by unmanned aerial vehicles in an orchard in Okayama, Japan, and then the digital surface model was generated by using a Structure from Motion (SfM) and Multi-View Stereo (MVS) based software. After individual trees were identified through the use of an adaptive threshold and marker-controlled watershed segmentation in the digital surface model, the crown widths and CPA were calculated, and the accuracy was evaluated against manual delineation and field measurement, respectively. Taking manual delineation of 12 trees as reference, the root-mean-square errors of the proposed method were 0.08 m (R2 = 0.99) and 0.15 m (R2 = 0.93) for the two orthogonal crown widths, and 3.87 m2 for CPA (R2 = 0.89), while those taking field measurement of 44 trees as reference were 0.47 m (R2 = 0.91), 0.51 m (R2 = 0.74), and 4.96 m2 (R2 = 0.88). The change of growth rate of CPA showed that the peach trees grew faster from May to July than from July to September, with a wide variation in relative growth rates among trees. Not only can this method save labour by replacing field measurement, but also it can allow farmers to monitor the growth of orchard trees dynamically.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yue Mu, Yuichiro Fujii, Daisuke Takata, Bangyou Zheng, Koji Noshita, Kiyoshi Honda, Seishi Ninomiya, Wei Guo. Characterization of peach tree crown by using high-resolution images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Horticulture Research, 2018, 5 (1) : 74 DOI:10.1038/s41438-018-0097-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Rom, C. R. Light thresholds for apple tree canopy growth and development. HortScience 26, 989-992 (1991).

[2]

Plant, R., Pettygrove, G. & Reinert, W. Precision agriculture can increase profits and limit environmental impacts. Calif. Agric. 54, 66-71 (2000).

[3]

Narvaez, F. Y., Reina, G., Torres-Torriti, M., Kantor, G. & Cheein, F. A. A survey of ranging and imaging techniques for precision agriculture phenotyping. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22, 2428-2439 (2017).

[4]

Escolà, A. et al. Variable rate sprayer. Part 1-Orchard prototype: design, implementation and validation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 95, 122-135 (2013).

[5]

Chen, Y., Zhu, H. & Ozkan, H. E. Development of a variable-rate sprayer with laser scanning sensor to synchronize spray outputs to tree structures. Trans. ASABE 55, 773-781 (2012).

[6]

Maghsoudi, H., Minaei, S., Ghobadian, B. & Masoudi, H. Ultrasonic sensing of pistachio canopy for low-volume precision spraying. Comput. Electron. Agric. 112, 149-160 (2015).

[7]

Patrick, A. & Li, C. High throughput phenotyping of blueberry bush morphological traits using unmanned aerial systems. Remote Sens. 9, 1250 (2017).

[8]

Lordan, J. et al. An image-based method to study the fruit tree canopy and the pruning biomass production in a peach orchard. HortScience 50, 1809-1817 (2015).

[9]

Panagiotidis, D., Abdollahnejad, A., Surový, P. & Chiteculo, V. Determining tree height and crown diameter from high-resolution UAV imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 2392-2410 (2017).

[10]

Pretzsch, H. et al. Crown size and growing space requirement of common tree species in urban centres, parks, and forests. Urban For. Urban Green. 14, 466-479 (2015).

[11]

Hansche, P. E., Beres, V. & Hesse, C. O. Estimates of genetic and environmental effects on several traits in peach. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97, 76-79 (1972).

[12]

Röhle, H. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Ermittlung der Genauigkeit bei der Ablotung von Kronenradien mit dem Dachlot und durch senkrechtes Anvisieren des Kroueurandes (Hochblick-Messung). Forstarchiv 57, 67-71 (1986).

[13]

Bremer, M., Wichmann, V. & Rutzinger, M. Multi-temporal fine-scale modelling of Larix decidua forest plots using terrestrial LiDAR and hemispherical photographs. Remote Sens. Environ. 206, 189-204 (2018).

[14]

Díaz-Varela, R. A., de la Rosa, R., León, L. & Zarco-Tejada, P. J. High-resolution airborne UAV imagery to assess olive tree crown parameters using 3D photo reconstruction: application in breeding trials. Remote Sens. 7, 4213-4232 (2015).

[15]

Miller, J., Morgenroth, J. & Gomez, C. 3D modelling of individual trees using a handheld camera: accuracy of height, diameter and volume estimates. Urban For. Urban Green. 14, 932-940 (2015).

[16]

Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Diaz-Varela, R., Angileri, V. & Loudjani, P. Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photo-reconstruction methods. Eur. J. Agron. 55, 89-99 (2014).

[17]

Zhang, C. & Kovacs, J. M. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precis. Agric. 13, 693-712 (2012).

[18]

Dunford, R., Michel, K., Gagnage, M., Piégay, H. & Trémelo, M.-L. Potential and constraints of unmanned aerial vehicle technology for the characterization of Mediterranean riparian forest. Int. J. Remote Sens. 30, 4915-4935 (2009).

[19]

Mouelhi, A., Sayadi, M., Fnaiech, F., Mrad, K. & Romdhane, K. B. Automatic image segmentation of nuclear stained breast tissue sections using color active contour model and an improved watershed method. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 8, 421-436 (2013).

[20]

Meyer, F. Levelings, image simplification filters for segmentation. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 20, 59-72 (2004).

[21]

Moga, A. N. & Gabbouj, M. Parallel marker-based image segmentation with watershed transformation. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 51, 27-45 (1998).

[22]

Haris, K., Efstratiadis, S. N., Maglaveras, N. & Katsaggelos, A. K. Hybrid image segmentation using watersheds and fast region merging. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 1684-1699 (1998).

[23]

Hamarneh, G. & Li, X. Watershed segmentation using prior shape and appearance knowledge. Image Vis. Comput. 27, 59-68 (2009).

[24]

Popescu, S. C., Wynne, R. H. & Nelson, R. F. Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Can. J. Remote Sens. 29, 564-577 (2003).

[25]

Strecha, C., Küng, O. & Fua, P. Automatic mapping from ultra-light UAV imagery. in Proc. EuroCOW 2012 (2012).

[26]

Bradley, D. & Roth, G. Adaptive thresholding using the integral image. J. Graph. Tools 12, 13-21 (2007).

[27]

Meyer, F. Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Process. 38, 113-125 (1994).

[28]

Rufato, L., Brighenti, A. F., Rufato, A. D., Dominguez, L. I. & Robinson, T. L. Vigor control in ‘McIntosh’ apple trees by growth inhibitors. Acta Hortic. 1117, 223-228 (2017).

[29]

Costa, G. et al. The effect of prohexadione-Ca on vegetative and cropping performance and fire blight control of pear trees. Acta Hortic. 596, 531-534 (2002).

[30]

Basso, B. et al. Environmental and economic benefits of variable rate nitrogen fertilization in a nitrate vulnerable zone. Sci. Total Environ. 545-546, 227-235 (2016).

PDF (10466KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/