Rapid and user-friendly open-source CRISPR/Cas9 system for single- or multi-site editing of tomato genome

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9-induced genome editing is a powerful tool for studying gene function in a variety of organisms, including plants. Using multi-sgRNAs to target one or more genes is helpful to improve the efficacy of gene editing and facilitate multi-gene editing. Here, we describe a CRISPR/Cas9 system which can be conveniently developed as a CRISPR kit. SgRNA expression cassettes can be rapidly generated by one-step PCR using our CRISPR kit. In our kit, there are two binary vectors pHNCas9 and pHNCas9HT. The binary vector pHNCas9 was constructed to allow to assemble up to eight sgRNA expression cassettes by one-step Golden Gate cloning. Another binary vector pHNCas9HT can be used to generate a large number of single target constructs by directly transforming ligation reactions products into A. tumefaciens without several procedures, such as PCR and plasmid extraction. The two binary vectors are designed according to the principles of standard BioBrick assembly to be used as an open-source tool. For example, we used BioBrick as a visual T-DNA tag. We also developed a primer design aid to complement the system. With this primer design aid, researchers can rapidly obtain primers and GC content, and sgRNA sequence of target site. Our CRISPR/Cas9 system can perform single- and multi-site editing and multiple gene editing to produce various types of mutations in tomato. This rapid and user-friendly CRISPR/Cas9 system for tomato can be potentially used for mutagenesis of important crop species for genetic improvement and is suitable for research into the function of genes.

References

[1] Alonso, J. M. & Ecker, J. R. Moving forward in reverse: genetic technologies to enable genome-wide phenomic screens in Arabidopsis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 524-536 (2006).

[2] Waterhouse, P. M., Graham, H. W. & Wang, M. B. Virus resistance and gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense and antisense RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95, 13959-13964 (1998).

[3] Zamore, P. D., Tuschl, T., Sharp, P. A. & Bartel, D. P. RNAi. Cell 101, 25-33 (2000).

[4] Senthil-Kumar, M. & Mysore, K. S. New dimensions for VIGS in plant functional genomics. Trends. Plant. Sci. 16, 656-665 (2011).

[5] Zilberman, D., Cao, X. F. & Jacobsen, S. E. ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science 299, 716-719 (2003).

[6] Zhang, Z. et al. A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1519-1533 (2016).

[7] Peters, J. L., Cnudde, F. & Gerats, T. Forward genetics and map-based cloning approaches. Trends. Plant. Sci. 8, 484-491 (2003).

[8] Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. F. 3rd. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397-405 (2013).

[9] Wyman, C. & Kanaar, R. DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 363-383 (2006).

[10] Bortesi, L. et al. Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 14, 2203-2216 (2016).

[11] Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262-1278 (2014).

[12] Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1077, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096 (2014).

[13] Li, J.-F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688-691 (2013).

[14] Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. G. & Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 691-693 (2013).

[15] Rinaldo, A. R. & Ayliffe, M. Gene targeting and editing in crop plants: a new era of precision opportunities. Mol. Breeding 35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0210-z (2015).

[16] Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).

[17] Mali, P. et al. RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).

[18] Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 109, E2579-E2586 (2012).

[19] Qin, W., Kutny, P., Dion, S., Zhang, Y. & Wang, H. One-step generation of mice carrying gene-edited alleles by the CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering with high efficiency. Transgenic. Res. 23, 879- 879 (2014).

[20] Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 41-52 (2015).

[21] Ma, X. et al. A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).

[22] Han, J. et al. Efficient in vivo deletion of a large imprinted lncRNA by CRISPR/Cas9. RNA Biol. 11, 829-835 (2014).

[23] Xing, H. L. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 327 (2014).

[24] Lowder, L. G. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 971-985 (2015).

[25] Wang, C., Shen, L., Fu, Y., Yan, C. & Wang, K. A simple CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex genome editing in rice. J. Genet. Genomics. 42, 703-706 (2015).

[26] Vad-Nielsen, J., Lin, L., Bolund, L., Nielsen, A. L. & Luo, Y. L. Golden Gate Assembly of CRISPR gRNA expression array for simultaneously targeting multiple genes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 73, 4315-4325 (2016).

[27] Vazquez-Vilar, M. et al. A modular toolbox for gRNA-Cas9 genome engineering in plants based on the GoldenBraid standard. Plant. Methods 12, 10 (2016).

[28] Xiong, J. S., Ding, J. & Li, Y. Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding. Hortic. Res. 2, 15019 (2015).

[29] Tom Knight, R. R., Leon Chan, Drew Endy, Reshma Shetty, Austin Che . MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MDoB, MIT Division, Engineering oB. Idempotent Vector Design for the Standard Assembly of Biobricks. Tech. rep., MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group Technical Reports. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/21168 (2003).

[30] Smolke, C. D. Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1099-1102 (2009).

[31] Cermak, T. et al. A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants. Plant Cell 29, 1196-1217 (2017).

[32] Zuluaga, D. L. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana MYB75/PAP1 transcription factor induces anthocyanin production in transgenic tomato plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 606-618 (2008).

[33] Huang, W., Xian, Z., Kang, X., Tang, N. & Li, Z. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of GRAS gene family in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 209 (2015).

[34] Hu, Z. L., Deng, L., Chen, X. Q., Wang, P. Q. & Chen, G. P. Co-suppression of the EIN2-homology gene LeEIN2 inhibits fruit ripening and reduces ethylene sensitivity in tomato. Russ. J. Plant Physl 57, 554-559 (2010).

[35] Liu, M. et al. Comprehensive profiling of ethylene response factor expression identifies ripening-associated erf genes and their link to key regulators of fruit ripening in tomato. Plant Physiol. 170, 1732-1744 (2016).

[36] Hao, Y. et al. Auxin response factor SlARF2 is an essential component of the regulatory mechanism controlling fruit ripening in tomato. Plos Genet. 11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005649 (2015).

[37] Cara, B. & Giovannoni, J. J. Molecular biology of ethylene during tomato fruit development and maturation. Plant Sci. 175, 106-113 (2008).

[38] Yokotani, N. et al. Ripening-associated ethylene biosynthesis in tomato fruit is autocatalytically and developmentally regulated. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 3433-3442 (2009).

[39] Curtis, M. D. & Grossniklaus, U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 133, 462-469 (2003).

[40] Lee, L.-Y. & Gelvin, S. B. T-DNA binary vectors and systems. Plant Physiol. 146, 325-332 (2008).

[41] Gao, J. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol. Biol. 87, 99-110 (2015).

[42] Ma, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Y. & Liu, Y. G. CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol. Plant 9, 961-974 (2016).

[43] Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Kandzia, R. & Marillonnet, S. Golden gate shuffling: a one-pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes. PLoS. ONE 4, e5553 (2009).

[44] Lei, Y. et al. CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 7, 1494-1496 (2014).

[45] Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).

[46] Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).

[47] Fillatti, J. J., Kiser, J., Rose, R. & Comai, L. Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. Bio-Technol. 5, 726-730 (1987).

[48] Ren, X. et al. Enhanced specificity and efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system with optimized sgRNA parameters in Drosophila. Cell Rep 9, 1151-1162 (2014).

[49] Liang, G., Zhang, H., Lou, D. & Yu, D. Selection of highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9-based plant genome editing. Sci Rep 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21451 (2016).

[50] Fu, Y., Sander, J. D., Reyon, D., Cascio, V. M. & Joung, J. K. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 279-284 (2014).

[51] Lu, H.-P. et al. CRISPR-S: an active interference element for a rapid and inexpensive selection of genome-edited, transgene-free rice plants. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 15, 1371-1373 (2017).