An AGAMOUS-like factor is associated with the origin of two domesticated varieties in Cymbidium sinense (Orchidaceae)

Abstract

Cymbidium has been artificially domesticated for centuries in Asia, which produced numerous cultivated varieties. Flowers with stamenoid tepals or those with multiple tepals have been found in different species of Cymbidium; however, the molecular basis controlling the formation of these phenotypes is still largely unknown. Previous work demonstrated that AGAMOUS/AG lineage MADS genes function in floral meristem determinacy as well as in reproductive organs development in both dicots and monocots, indicating a possible relationship with the origin of two flower varieties in Cymbidium. Here, we characterized and analyzed two AG lineage paralogues, CsAG1 and CsAG2, from Cymbidium sinense, both of which were highly expressed in the gynostemium column of a standard C. sinense. Interestingly, we detected ectopic expression of CsAG1 rather than CsAG2 in all floral organs of a stamenoid-tepal variety and significant down-regulation of CsAG1 in a variety with multiple tepals. Over-expression of CsAG1 in wild type Arabidopsis resulted in petal-to-stamen homeotic conversion, suggesting a conserved C-function of CsAG1 in the development of Cymbidium flower. Altogether, our results supported a hypothesis that disruption of a single AG-like factor would be associated with the formation of two domesticated varieties in C. sinense.

References

[1] Li, X. et al. Genetic diversity, population structure, pollen morphology and cross-compatibility among Chinese Cymbidiums. Plant Breed. 133, 145 (2014).

[2] Liu, Z., Chen, S., Ru, Z. & Chen, L. The Genus Cymbidium in China. (Science Press, Beijing, China, 2006).

[3] Duttke, S., Zoulias, N. & Kim, M. Mutant flower morphologies in the wind orchid, a novel orchid model species. Plant Physiol. 158, 1542 (2012).

[4] Schmidt, R. J. et al. Identification and molecular characterization of ZAG1, the maize homolog of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS. Plant Cell 5, 729 (1993).

[5] Yamaguchi, T. et al. Functional diversification of the two C-class MADS box genes OSMADS3 and OSMADS58 in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 18, 15 (2006).

[6] Dreni, L. & Kater, M. M. MADS reloaded: evolution of the AGAMOUS subfamily genes. New Phytol. 201, 717 (2014).

[7] Yanofsky, M. F. et al. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS resembles transcription factors. Nature 346, 35 (1990).

[8] Drews, G. N., Bowman, J. L. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product. Cell 65, 991 (1991).

[9] Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112, 1 (1991).

[10] Kramer, E. M., Jaramillo, M. A. & Di Stilio, V. S. Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics 166, 1011 (2004).

[11] Heijmans, K. et al. Redefining C and D in the petunia ABC. Plant Cell 24, 2305 (2012).

[12] Davies, B. et al. PLENA and FARINELLI: redundancy and regulatory interactions between two Antirrhinum MADS-box factors controlling flower development. Embo J. 18, 4023 (1999).

[13] Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1, 37 (1989).

[14] Huang, Z. et al. APETALA2 antagonizes the transcriptional activity of AGAMOUS in regulating floral stem cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 215, 1197 (2017).

[15] Pinyopich, A. et al. Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature 424, 85 (2003).

[16] Causier, B. et al. Evolution in action: following function in duplicated floral homeotic genes. Curr. Biol. 15, 1508 (2005).

[17] Dreni, L. et al. Functional analysis of all AGAMOUS subfamily members in rice reveals their roles in reproductive organ identity determination and meristem determinacy. Plant Cell 23, 2850 (2011).

[18] Mena, M. et al. Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science 274, 1537 (1996).

[19] Theißen, G., Strater, T., Fischer, A. & Saedler, H. Structural characterization, chromosomal localization and phylogenetic evaluation of two pairs of AGAMOUS-like MADS-box genes from maize. Gene 156, 155 (1995).

[20] Ambrose, B. A. et al. Molecular and genetic analyses of the silky1 gene reveal conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Mol. Cell 5, 569 (2000).

[21] Lin, C. et al. Transcriptome-wide analysis of the MADS-box gene family in the orchid Erycina pusilla. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 284 (2016).

[22] Salemme, M., Sica, M., Gaudio, L. & Aceto, S. The OitaAG and OitaSTK genes of the orchid Orchis italica: a comparative analysis with other C- and D-class MADS-box genes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 40, 3523 (2013).

[23] Xu, Y. et al. Floral organ identity genes in the orchid Dendrobium crumenatum. Plant J. 46, 54 (2006).

[24] Wang, S. et al. Duplicated C-Class MADS-box genes reveal distinct roles in gynostemium development in Cymbidium ensifolium (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 563 (2011).

[25] Hsu, H. F. et al. C/D class MADS-box genes from two monocots, orchid (OncidiumGower Ramsey) and lily (Lilium longiflorum), exhibit different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 1029 (2010).

[26] Chen, Y. et al. C- and D-class MADS-box genes from Phalaenopsis equestris (Orchidaceae) display functions in gynostemium and ovule development. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 1053 (2012).

[27] Almeida, A. M., Yockteng, R., Otoni, W. C. & Specht, C. D. Positive selection on the K domain of the AGAMOUS protein in the Zingiberales suggests a mechanism for the evolution of androecial morphology. Evodevo 6, 7 (2015).

[28] Zahn, L. M. et al. Conservation and divergence in the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS-box genes: evidence of independent sub- and neofunctionalization events. Evol. Dev. 8, 30 (2006).

[29] Liljegren, S. J. et al. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 404, 766 (2000).

[30] Gaut, B. S. & Doebley, J. F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6809 (1997).

[31] Pelaz, S. et al. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405, 200 (2000).

[32] Coen, E. S. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31 (1991).

[33] Mondragón-Palomino, M. & Theißen, G. Conserved differential expression of paralogous DEFICIENS- and GLOBOSA-like MADS-box genes in the flowers of Orchidaceae: refining the ‘orchid code’. Plant J. 66, 1008 (2011).

[34] Aceto, S. & Gaudio, L. The MADS and the beauty: genes involved in the development of orchid flowers. Curr. Genom. 12, 342 (2011).

[35] Chang, Y. Y. et al. Characterization of the possible roles for B class MADS box genes in regulation of perianth formation in orchid. Plant Physiol. 152, 837 (2010).

[36] Kaufmann, K. et al. Target genes of the MADS transcription factor SEPALLATA3: integration of developmental and hormonal pathways in the Arabidopsis flower. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000090 (2009).

[37] Darwin, C. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects. (John Murray, London, UK, 1862).

[38] Kurzweil, H. Developmental studies in orchid flowers I: epidendroid and vandoid species. Nord J. Bot. 7, 427 (1987).

[39] Kurzweil, H. Developmental studies in orchid flowers III: Neottioid species. Nord J. Bot. 8, 271 (1988).

[40] Kurzweil, H. Developmental studies in orchid flowers II: Orchidoid species. Nord J. Bot. 7, 443 (1987).

[41] Lee, S. et al. Establishment of an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation procedure for the experimental model orchid Erycina pusilla. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 120, 211 (2015).

[42] Tamura, K. et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725 (2013).

[43] Su, S. et al. The CYCLOIDEA-RADIALIS module regulates petal shape and pigmentation, leading to bilateral corolla symmetry in Torenia fournieri (Linderniaceae). New Phytol. 215, 1582 (2017).

[44] Zhu, G. et al. Transcriptome characterization of Cymbidium sinense ‘Dharma’ using 454 pyrosequencing and its application in the identification of genes associated with leaf color variation. Plos One 10, e128592 (2015).

[45] Coen, E. S. et al. Floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Cell 63, 1311 (1990).

[46] Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735 (1998).