The Tomato Hybrid Proline-rich Protein regulates the abscission zone competence to respond to ethylene signals

Abstract

The Tomato Hybrid Proline-rich Protein (THyPRP) gene was specifically expressed in the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) flower abscission zone (FAZ), and its stable antisense silencing under the control of an abscission zone (AZ)-specific promoter, Tomato Abscission Polygalacturonase4, significantly inhibited tomato pedicel abscission following flower removal. For understanding the THyPRP role in regulating pedicel abscission, a transcriptomic analysis of the FAZ of THyPRP-silenced plants was performed, using a newly developed AZ-specific tomato microarray chip. Decreased expression of THyPRP in the silenced plants was already observed before abscission induction, resulting in FAZ-specific altered gene expression of transcription factors, epigenetic modifiers, post-translational regulators, and transporters. Our data demonstrate that the effect of THyPRP silencing on pedicel abscission was not mediated by its effect on auxin balance, but by decreased ethylene biosynthesis and response. Additionally, THyPRP silencing revealed new players, which were demonstrated for the first time to be involved in regulating pedicel abscission processes. These include: gibberellin perception, Ca²⁺-Calmodulin signaling, Serpins and Small Ubiquitin-related Modifier proteins involved in post-translational modifications, Synthaxin and SNARE-like proteins, which participate in exocytosis, a process necessary for cell separation. These changes, occurring in the silenced plants early after flower removal, inhibited and/or delayed the acquisition of the competence of the FAZ cells to respond to ethylene signaling. Our results suggest that THyPRP acts as a master regulator of flower abscission in tomato, predominantly by playing a role in the regulation of the FAZ cell competence to respond to ethylene signals.

References

[1] Lewis, M.W., Leslie, M.E. & Liljegren, S.J. Plant separation: 50 ways to leave your mother. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 9, 59-65 (2006).

[2] Osborne, D.J. Abscission. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 8, 103-129 (1989).

[3] Kim, J. Four shades of detachment: regulation of floral organ abscission. Plant Signal. Behav. 9, e976154 (2014).

[4] Patterson, S.E. Cutting loose. Abscission and dehiscence in Arabidopsis. Plant. Physiol. 126, 494-500 (2001).

[5] Roberts, J.A., Elliott, K.A. & Gonzalez-Carranza, Z.H. Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 53, 131-158 (2002).

[6] Taylor, J.E. & Whitelaw, C.A. Signals in Abscission. New Phytol. 151, 323-340 (2001).

[7] Agusti, J., Merelo, P., Cercos, M., Tadeo, F.R. & Talon, M. Ethylene-induced differential gene expression during abscission of citrus leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2717-2733 (2008).

[8] Cai, S. & Lashbrook, C.C. Stamen abscission zone transcriptome profiling reveals new candidates for abscission control: enhanced retention of floral organs in transgenic plants overexpressing Arabidopsis ZINC FINGER PROTEIN2. Plant Physiol. 146, 1305-1321 (2008).

[9] Jiang, C.Z., Lu, F., Imsabai, W., Meir, S. & Reid, M.S. Silencing polygalacturonase expression inhibits tomato petiole abscission. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 973-979 (2008).

[10] Roberts, J.A. & Gonzalez-Carranza, Z.H. Pectinase functions in abscission. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 5, 1-4 (2009).

[11] Meir, S., Sundaresan, S., Riov, J., Agarwal, I. & Philosoph-Hadas, S. Role of auxin depletion in abscission control. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 11, 1-15 (2015).

[12] Butenko, M.A. et al. Ethylene-dependent and -independent pathways controlling floral abscission are revealed to converge using promoter::reporter gene constructs in the ida abscission mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 3627-3637 (2006).

[13] Estornell, L.H., Agusti, J., Merelo, P., Talon, M. & Tadeo, F.R. Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission. Plant. Sci. 199-200, 48-60 (2013).

[14] Meir, S., Hunter, D.A., Chen, J.C., Halaly, V. & Reid, M.S. Molecular changes occurring during acquisition of abscission competence following auxin depletion in Mirabilis jalapa. Plant. Physiol. 141, 1604-1616 (2006).

[15] Meir, S. et al. Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion. Plant. Physiol. 154, 1929-1956 (2010).

[16] Meir, S. et al. Identification of defense-related genes newly-associated with tomato flower abscission. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 590-593 (2011).

[17] Nakano, T., Fujisawa, M., Shima, Y. & Ito, Y. Expression profiling of tomato pre-abscission pedicels provides insights into abscission zone properties including competence to respond to abscission signals. BMC Plant Biol. 13, 40 (2013).

[18] Wang, X. et al. Transcriptome analysis of tomato flower pedicel tissues reveals abscission zone-specific modulation of key meristem activity genes. PLoS ONE 8, e55238 (2013).

[19] Ma, C. et al. A KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX protein regulates abscission in tomato by modulating the auxin pathway. Plant Physiol. 167, 844-853 (2015).

[20] Salts, Y., Wachs, R., Gruissem, W. & Barg, R. Sequence coding for a novel proline-rich protein preferentially expressed in young tomato fruit. Plant Mol. Biol. 17, 149-150 (1991).

[21] Salts, Y., Kenigsbuch, D., Wachs, R., Gruissem, W. & Barg, R. DNA sequence of the tomato fruit expressed proline-rich protein gene TPRP-F1 reveals an intron within the 3 untranslated transcript. Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 407-409 (1992).

[22] Jose-Estanyol, M., Gomis-Ruth, F.X. & Puigdomenech, P. The eight-cysteine motif, a versatile structure in plant proteins. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42, 355-365 (2004).

[23] Ball, L.J., Kuhne, R., Schneider-Mergener, J. & Oschkinat, H. Recognition of proline-rich motifs by protein-protein-interaction domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 2852-2869 (2005).

[24] Zarrinpar, A., Bhattacharyya, R.P. & Lim, W.A. The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci. Stke. 2003, Re8 (2003).

[25] Jose-Estanyol, M. & Puigdomenech, P. Plant cell wall glycoproteins and their genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 38, 97-108 (2000).

[26] Showalter, A.M. Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. Plant Cell. 5, 9-23 (1993).

[27] Dvorakova, L., Cvrckova, F. & Fischer, L. Analysis of the hybrid proline-rich protein families from seven plant species suggests rapid diversification of their sequences and expression patterns. BMC Genomics 8, 412 (2007).

[28] He, C.Y., Zhang, J.S. & Chen, S.Y. A soybean gene encoding a proline-rich protein is regulated by salicylic acid, an endogenous circadian rhythm and by various stresses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 1125-1131 (2002).

[29] Weyman, P.D., Pan, Z., Feng, Q., Gilchrist, D.G. & Bostock, R.M. A circadian rhythm-regulated tomato gene is induced by Arachidonic acid and Phytophthora infestans infection. Plant Physiol. 140, 235-248 (2006).

[30] Zhang, Y. & Schlappi, M. Cold responsive EARLI1 type HyPRPs improve freezing survival of yeast cells and form higher order complexes in plants. Planta 227, 233-243 (2007).

[31] Yeom, S.I., Seo, E., Oh, S.K., Kim, K.W. & Choi, D. A common plant cell-wall protein HyPRP1 has dual roles as a positive regulator of cell death and a negative regulator of basal defense against pathogens. Plant J. 69, 755-768 (2012).

[32] Li, M. et al. De novo analysis of transcriptome reveals genes associated with leaf abscission in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). BMC Genomics 17, 195 (2016).

[33] Santino, C.G., Stanford, G.L. & Conner, T.W. Developmental and transgenic analysis of two tomato fruit enhanced genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 33, 405-416 (1997).

[34] Sundaresan, S. et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing and development of abscission zone-specific microarray as a new molecular tool for analysis of tomato organ abscission. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1258 (2016).

[35] Fillatti, J.J., Kiser, J., Rose, R. & Comai, L. Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. Nat. Biotech. 5, 726-730 (1987).

[36] Hong, S.B., Sexton, R. & Tucker, M.L. Analysis of gene promoters for two tomato polygalacturonases expressed in abscission zones and the stigma. Plant. Physiol. 123, 869-881 (2000).

[37] Lashbrook, C.C. Functional genomic approaches to abscission. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 5, 1-7 (2009).

[38] Lashbrook, C.C. & Cai, S. Cell wall remodeling in Arabidopsis stamen abscission zones: temporal aspects of control inferred from transcriptional profiling. Plant Signal. Behav. 3, 733-736 (2008).

[39] Bar-Dror, T. et al. Programmed cell death occurs asymmetrically during abscission in tomato. Plant Cell 23, 4146-4163 (2011).

[40] Kim, J. et al. Examination of the abscission-associated transcriptomes for soybean, tomato, and arabidopsis highlights the conserved biosynthesis of an extensible extracellular matrix and boundary layer. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1109 (2015).

[41] Jiang, L. et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel pathogenesis-related protein gene (Gmprp) with induced expression in soybean (Glycine max) during infection with Phytophthora sojae. PLoS ONE 10, e0129932 (2015).

[42] Guan, X. et al. Temporal and spatial distribution of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR genes during tomato flower abscission. J. Plant Growth Regul. 33, 317-327 (2014).

[43] Zuo, X. et al. Expression patterns of auxin-responsive genes during tomato flower pedicel abscission and potential effects of calcium. Aust. J. Bot. 60, 68-78 (2012).

[44] Bornman, C.H., Addicott, F.T. & Spurr, A.R. Auxin and gibberellin effects on cell growth and starch during abscission in cotton. Plant Physiol. 41, 871-876 (1966).

[45] Chatterjee, S.K. & Leopold, A.C. Kinetin and gibberellin actions on abscission processes. Plant Physiol. 39, 334-337 (1964).

[46] Morgan, P.W. & Durham, J.I. Ethylene-induced leaf abscission is promoted by gibberellic acid. Plant Physiol. 55, 308-311 (1975).

[47] Domingos, S. et al. Shared and divergent pathways for flower abscission are triggered by gibberellic acid and carbon starvation in seedless Vitis vinifera L.. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 38 (2016).

[48] Gao, Y. et al. Transcriptome profiling of petal abscission zone and functional analysis of an AUX/IAA family gene RhIAA16 involved in petal shedding in rose. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1375 (2016).

[49] Khan, M., Xu, H. & Hepworth, S.R. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes: setting boundaries in development and defense. Plant Sci. 215-216, 157-171 (2014).

[50] Pei, M., Niu, J., Li, C., Cao, F. & Quan, S. Identification and expression analysis of genes related to calyx persistence in Korla fragrant pear. BMC Genomics 17, 132 (2016).

[51] Corbacho, J., Romojaro, F., Pech, J.C., Latche, A. & Gomez-Jimenez, M.C. Transcriptomic events involved in melon mature-fruit abscission comprise the sequential induction of cell-wall degrading genes coupled to a stimulation of endo and exocytosis. PLoS ONE 8, e58363 (2013).

[52] Wei, P.C. et al. Overexpression of AtDOF4.7, an Arabidopsis DOF family transcription factor, induces floral organ abscission deficiency in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 153, 1031-1045 (2010).

[53] Kim, J. et al. Transcriptome analysis of soybean leaf abscission identifies transcriptional regulators of organ polarity and cell fate. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 125 (2016).

[54] Zhou, J. et al. Characterization of the promoter and extended C-terminal domain of Arabidopsis WRKY33 and functional analysis of tomato WRKY33 homologues in plant stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4567-4583 (2015).

[55] Datta, R. et al. Glutathione regulates 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase transcription via WRKY33 and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase by modulating messenger RNA stability to induce ethylene synthesis during stress. Plant Physiol. 169, 2963-2981 (2015).

[56] Gao, Q.M., Venugopal, S., Navarre, D. & Kachroo, A. Low oleic acid-derived repression of jasmonic acid-inducible defense responses requires the WRKY50 and WRKY51 proteins. Plant Physiol. 155, 464-476 (2011).

[57] Yadav, R.K. & Reddy, G.V. WUSCHEL protein movement and stem cell homeostasis. Plant Signal. Behav. 7, 592-594 (2012).

[58] Nakano, T. et al. MACROCALYX and JOINTLESS interact in the transcriptional regulation of tomato fruit abscission zone development. Plant Physiol. 158, 439-450 (2012).

[59] Nakano, T., Fujisawa, M., Shima, Y. & Ito, Y. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SlERF52 functions in flower pedicel abscission in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3111-3119 (2014).

[60] Butenko, M.A. et al. INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION controls floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis and identifies a novel family of putative ligands in plants. Plant Cell 15, 2296-2307 (2003).

[61] Stenvik, G.E. et al. The EPIP peptide of INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION is sufficient to induce abscission in Arabidopsis through the receptor-like kinases HAESA and HAESA-LIKE2. Plant Cell 20, 1805-1817 (2008).

[62] Reeves, R. Nuclear functions of the HMG proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1799, 3-14 (2010).

[63] Lipka, V., Kwon, C. & Panstruga, R. SNARE-ware: the role of SNARE-domain proteins in plant biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 147-174 (2007).

[64] Sexton, R. & Hall, J.L. Fine structure and cytochemistry of the abscission zone cells of phaseolus leaves: I. Ultrastructural changes occurring during abscission. Ann. Bot. 38, 849-854 (1974).

[65] Sexton, R., Jamieson, G.G.C. & Allan, M.H.I.L. An ultrastructural study of abscission zone cells with special reference to the mechanism of enzyme secretion. Protoplasma 91, 369-387 (1977).

[66] Agusti, J. et al. Early gene expression events in the laminar abscission zone of abscission-promoted citrus leaves after a cycle of water stress/rehydration: involvement of CitbHLH1. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 6079-6091 (2012).

[67] Gil-Amado, J.A. & Gomez-Jimenez, M.C. Transcriptome analysis of mature fruit abscission control in olive. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 244-269 (2013).

[68] Leslie, M.E., Lewis, M.W., Youn, J.Y., Daniels, M.J. & Liljegren, S.J. The EVERSHED receptor-like kinase modulates floral organ shedding in Arabidopsis. Development 137, 467-476 (2010).

[69] Liljegren, S.J. Organ abscission: exit strategies require signals and moving traffic. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 670-676 (2012).

[70] Liljegren, S.J. et al. Regulation of membrane trafficking and organ separation by the NEVERSHED ARF-GAP protein. Development 136, 1909-1918 (2009).

[71] Zhang, J.Z., Zhao, K., Ai, X.Y. & Hu, C.G. Involvements of PCD and changes in gene expression profile during self-pruning of spring shoots in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). BMC Genomics 15, 892 (2014).

[72] Sundaresan, S. et al. Abscission of flowers and floral organs is closely associated with alkalization of the cytosol in abscission zone cells. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 1355-1368 (2015).

[73] Reinders, A., Panshyshyn, J.A. & Ward, J.M. Analysis of transport activity of Arabidopsis sugar alcohol permease homolog AtPLT5. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1594-1602 (2005).

[74] Cheng, Y.-Q. et al. RNA-seq analysis reveals ethylene-mediated reproductive organ development and abscission in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Plant Mol. Biol. Report 31, 607-619 (2013).

[75] Mann, M. & Jensen, O.N. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 255-261 (2003).

[76] Mazzucotelli, E. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase gene family in plants: regulation by degradation. Curr. Genomics 7, 509-522 (2006).

[77] del Pozo, J.C. & Estelle, M. F-box proteins and protein degradation: an emerging theme in cellular regulation. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 123-128 (2000).

[78] Estelle, M. Proteases and cellular regulation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 4, 254-260 (2001).

[79] Vierstra, R.D. The expanding universe of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers. Plant Physiol. 160, 2-14 (2012).

[80] Miura, K. & Hasegawa, P.M. Sumoylation and other ubiquitin-like post-translational modifications in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 223-232 (2010).

[81] Miura, K., Jin, J.B. & Hasegawa, P.M. Sumoylation, a post-translational regulatory process in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 10, 495-502 (2007).

[82] Law, R.H. et al. An overview of the serpin superfamily. Genome Biol. 7, 216 (2006).

[83] Khan, M.S. et al. Serpin inhibition mechanism: a delicate balance between native metastable state and polymerization. J. Amino Acids 2011, 606797 (2011).

[84] Gonzalez-Carranza, Z.H. et al. HAWAIIAN SKIRT: an F-box gene that regulates organ fusion and growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 144, 1370-1382 (2007).

[85] Tripathi, S.K., Singh, A.P., Sane, A.P. & Nath, P. Transcriptional activation of a 37 kDa ethylene responsive cysteine protease gene, RbCP1, is associated with protein degradation during petal abscission in rose. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2035-2044 (2009).

[86] Kim, J., Patterson, S.E. & Binder, B.M. Reducing jasmonic acid levels causes ein2 mutants to become ethylene responsive. FEBS Lett. 587, 226-230 (2013).

[87] Rochaix, J.D. et al. Protein kinases and phosphatases involved in the acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to a changing light environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 3466-3474 (2012).

[88] Trewavas, A . Post-translational modification of proteins by phosphorylation. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 27, 349-374 (1976).

[89] Patharkar, O.R. & Walker, J.C. Floral organ abscission is regulated by a positive feedback loop. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2906-2911 (2015).

[90] Zhang, X.L., Qi, M.F., Xu, T., Lu, X.J. & Li, T.L. Proteomics profiling of ethylene-induced tomato flower pedicel abscission. J. Proteom. 121, 67-87 (2015).

[91] Santos, L. Molecular mechanisms of the AAA proteins in plants. Adv. Agric. Food Biotechnol. 37, 1-15 (2006).

[92] Lee, C.B., Swatek, K.N. & McClure, B. Pollen proteins bind to the C-terminal domain of Nicotiana alata pistil arabinogalactan proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26965-26973 (2008).

[93] Kim, Y.C., Kim, S.Y., Choi, D., Ryu, C.M. & Park, J.M. Molecular characterization of a pepper C2 domain-containing SRC2 protein implicated in resistance against host and non-host pathogens and abiotic stresses. Planta 227, 1169-1179 (2008).

[94] Li, C., Wang, Y., Ying, P., Ma, W. & Li, J. Genome-wide digital transcript analysis of putative fruitlet abscission related genes regulated by ethephon in litchi. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 502 (2015).

[95] Livak, K.J. & Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).