Differential gene expression analysis of ‘Chili’ (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit pericarp with two types of bagging treatments

Abstract

Preharvest bagging is a simple, grower-friendly and safe physical protection technique commonly applied to many fruits, and the application of different fruit bags can have various effects. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the fruit quality effects of different bagging treatments, digital gene expression (DGE) profiling of bagged and unbagged ‘Chili’ (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) pear pericarp during development was performed. Relative to unbagged fruit, a total of 3022 and 769 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the polyethylene (PE)-bagged and non-woven fabric-bagged fruit, respectively. DEGs annotated as photosynthesis-antenna proteins and photosynthesis metabolism pathway were upregulated in non-woven fabric-bagged fruit but downregulated in the PE-bagged fruit. Non-woven fabric bagging inhibited lignin synthesis in ‘Chili’ pear pericarp by downregulating DEGs involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; consequently, the fruit lenticels in non-woven fabric-bagged fruit were smaller than those in the other treatments. The results indicate that the non-woven fabric bagging method has a positive effect on the appearance of ‘Chili’ pear fruit but neither of the two bagging treatments is conducive to the accumulation of soluble sugar.

References

[1] Liu QH, Zhou QH, Wang KL, Liu QF, Lv ZN . Anatomicals studies on the speckle of the Laiyang pear. J Laiyang Agricult Coll 1992; 92: 104-108.

[2] Şen A, Miranda I, Santos S, Graça J, Pereira H . The chemical composition of cork and phloem in the rhytidome of Quercus cerris bark. Ind Crops Prod 2010; 31: 417-422.

[3] Koes R, Verweij W, Quattrocchio F . Flavonoids: a colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci 2005; 10: 236-242.

[4] Sharma RR, Reddy SVR, Jhalegar MJ . Pre-harvest fruit bagging: a useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality-a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 2014; 89: 101-113.

[5] Xu HX, Chen JW, Xie M . Effect of different light transmittance paper bags on fruit quality and antioxidant capacity in loquat. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783-1788.

[6] Amarante C, Banks NH, Max S . Effect of preharvest bagging on fruit quality and postharvest physiology of pears (Pyrus communis). New Zeal J Crop Hortic Sci 2002; 30: 99-107.

[7] Faoro ID, Mondardo M . Bagging of Nashi pear cv. Housui. Rev Bras frutic 2004; 26: 86-88.

[8] Lin J, Chang YH, Yan ZM, Li XG . Effects of bagging on the quality of pear fruit and pesticide residues. Acta Hortic 2008; 772: 315-318.

[9] Hong KH, Kim JK, Jang HI, Choi JH, Han JW, Kim KY . Effect of paper sources for bagging on the appearance of fruit skin in oriental pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai cvs. Gamcheonbae, Yeongsanbae). J Korean Soc Horticult Sci 1999; 40: 554-558.

[10] Teng YZ, Fan LM, Shen JL, Liu CL, Wang YZ, Yuan YB . Effects of nonwoven PP fruit bag on berry qualities of ‘Red Globe’ and ‘Muscat Hamburg’ grape. J Fruit Sci 2011; 28: 787-791.

[11] Liu T, Song S, Yuan YB, Wu DJ, Chen MJ, Sun QN et al. Improved peach peel color development by fruit bagging. Enhanced expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic and regulatory genes using white non-woven polypropylene as replacement for yellow paper. Sci Hortic 2015; 184: 142-148.

[12] Wu J, Wang ZW, Shi ZB, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu SL et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res 2013; 23: 396-408.

[13] Chagné D, Crowhurst RN, Pindo M, Thrimawithana A, Deng C, Ireland H et al. The draft genome sequence of European pear (Pyrus communis L. ‘Bartlett’). PLoS One 2014; 9: e92644.

[14] Lu GL, Li ZJ, Zhang XF, Wang R, Yang SL . Expression analysis of lignin associated genes in hard end pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Whangkeumbae) and its response to calcium chloride treatment conditions. J Plant Growth Regul 2015; 34: 251-262.

[15] Li XX, Li JZ . Determination of the content of soluble sugar in sweet corn with optimized anthrone colorimetric method. Storage and Process 2013; 13: 24-27.

[16] Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL . TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 1105-1111.

[17] Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 511-515.

[18] Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B . Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 2008; 5: 621-628.

[19] Leng N, Dawson JA, Thomson JA, Ruotti V, Rissman AI, Smits BM et al. EBSeq: an empirical Bayes hierarchical model for inference in RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 2013; 29: 1035-1043.

[20] Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J . topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R package version 2: 02010.

[21] Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L . Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3787-3793.

[22] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^-ΔΔCT method . Methods 2001; 25: 402-408.

[23] Thum KE, Kim M, Christopher DA, Mullet JE . Cryptochrome 1, cryptochrome 2, and phytochrome a co-activate the chloroplast psbD blue light-responsive promoter. Plant Cell 2001; 13: 2747-2760.

[24] Youvan DC, Marrs BL . Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis. Sci Am 1987; 256: 42-48.

[25] Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K . Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature 1997; 386: 299-302.

[26] Yang SL, Wang M, Zhang XF, Wang CR, Wang R . Effects of bagging treatment on sugar metabolism and related gene expression in ‘Chili’ pear fruits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 2013; 40: 1887-1897.

[27] Cai C, Xu CJ, Li X, Ferguson I, Chen KS . Accumulation of lignin in relation to change in activities of lignification enzymes in loquat fruit flesh after harvest. Postharvest Biol Technol 2006; 40: 163-169.

[28] Vanholme R, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W . Lignin engineering. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008; 11: 278-285.

[29] Gao H, Guo DM, Liu WJ, Ran JH, Wang XQ . Evolution of the 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase (4CL) gene family: conserved evolutionary pattern and two new gene classes in gymnosperms. J Syst Evol 2012; 50: 195-205.

[30] Voelker SL, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Jourdes M, Ki C, Patten AM et al. Antisense down-regulation of 4CL expression alters lignification tree growth, and saccharification potential of field grown poplar. Plant Physiol 2010; 154: 874-886.

[31] Wagner A, Donaldson L, Kim H, Phillips L, Flint H, Steward D et al. Suppression of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase in the coniferous gymnosperm Pinus radiata. Plant Physiol 2009; 149: 370-383.

[32] Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M . Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2003; 54: 519-546.

[33] Hirano K, Aya K, Kondo M, Okuno A, Morinaka Y, Matsuoka M . OsCAD2 is the major CAD gene responsible for monolignol biosynthesis in rice culm. Plant Cell Rep 2012; 31: 91-101.

[34] Li XJ, Yang Y, Yao JL, Chen GX, Li XH, Zhang QF et al. FLEXIBLE CULM 1 encoding a cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase controls culm mechanical strength in rice. Plant Mol Biol 2009; 69: 685-697.

[35] Sitbon F, Hennion S, Little CHA, Sundberg B . Enhanced ethylene production and peroxidase activity in IAA-overproducing transgenic tobacco plants is associated with increased lignin content and altered lignin composition. Plant Sci 1999; 141: 165-173.

[36] Ipekci Z, Ogras T, Altlnkut A, Bajrovic K, Kazan K, Gozukirmizi N et al. Reduced leaf peroxidase activity is associated with reduced lignin content in transgenic poplar. Plant Biotechnol 1999; 16: 381-387.

[37] Chen YA, Shin JW, Liu ZH . Effect of light on peroxidase and lignin synthesis in mungbean hypocotyls. Plant Physiol Bioch 2002; 40: 33-39.

[38] Zhang H, Hanley S, Goodman HM . Isolation, characterization and chromosomal location of a new cab gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1991; 96: 1387-1388.

[39] Feng JJ, Chen JW, Xu HX, Zhang YC, Xie M, Hu YC . Effect of different light transmittance paper bags on fruit quality and antioxidant capacity in Ninghaibai loquat cultivar. J Fruit Sci 2009; 26: 66-70.

[40] Moriguchi T, Abe K, Sanada T, Yamaki S . Levels and role of sucrose synthase sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase in sucrose accumulation in fruit of Asian pear. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1992; 117: 274-278.

[41] Pattanayak D. Light regulation of diurnal variation of sucrosephosphate synthase in potato. Biol Plantarum 1998; 41: 369-376.

[42] Feng SQ, Chen XS, Zhang YM, Wang YL, Song Y, Chen XL et al. Differential expression of proteins in red pear following fruit bagging treatment. Protein J 2011; 30: 194-200.

[43] Hudina M, Stampar F . Effect of fruit bagging on quality of ‘Conference’ pear (Pyrus communis L.). Eur J Hortic Sci 2012; 76: 176-181.