Rapid screening for citrus canker resistance employing pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity responses

Abstract

Citrus canker, caused by the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri (Xcc), has been attributed to millions of dollars in loss or damage to commercial citrus crops in subtropical production areas of the world. Since identification of resistant plants is one of the most effective methods of disease management, the ability to screen for resistant seedlings plays a key role in the production of a long-term solution to canker. Here, an inverse correlation between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by the plant and the ability of Xcc to grow and form lesions on infected plants is reported. Based on this information, a novel screening method that can rapidly identify citrus seedlings that are less susceptible to early infection by Xcc was devised by measuring ROS accumulation triggered by a 22-amino acid sequence of the conserved N-terminal part of flagellin (flg22) from X. citri ssp. citri (Xcc-flg22). In addition to limiting disease symptoms, ROS production was also correlated with the expression of basal defense-related genes such as the pattern recognition receptors LRR8 and FLS2, the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein RLP12, and the defense-related gene PR1, indicating an important role for pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) in determining resistance to citrus canker. Moreover, the differential expression patterns observed amongst the citrus seedlings demonstrated the existence of genetic variations in the PTI response among citrus species/varieties.

References

[1] Cubero J, Graham JH . Genetic relationship among worldwide strains of Xanthomonas causing canker in citrus species and design of new primers for their identification by PCR. Appl Environ Microb 2002; 68: 1257-1264.

[2] Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Lacy G, Sechler A, Agarkova IV et al. Emended classification of xanthomonad pathogens on citrus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2006; 29: 690-695.

[3] Das AK . Citrus canker - A review. J Appl Hort 2003; 5: 52-60.

[4] Stall RE, Civerolo EL . Research relating to the recent outbreak of citrus canker in Florida. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1991; 29: 399-420.

[5] Leyns F, Decleene M, Swings JG, Deley J . The host range of the genus Xanthomonas. Bot Rev 1984; 50: 308-356.

[6] Schubert TS, Sun X . Bacterial citrus canker. In: Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, editor. Plant Pathology Circular. Gainesville, Florida: Division of Plant Industry, 2003: 1-6.

[7] Gottwald T, Graham J, Schubert T . Citrus canker: The pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress 2002.

[8] Brunings AM, Gabriel DW . Xanthomonas citri: Breaking the surface. Mol Plant Pathol 2003; 4: 141-157.

[9] Civerolo EL . Bacterial canker disease of citrus. J Rio Grande Valley Hort Assoc 1984; 37: 127-146.

[10] Schubert TS, Rizvi SA, Sun XA, Gottwald TR, Graham JH et al. Meeting the challenge of eradicating citrus canker in Florida - again. Plant Dis 2001; 85: 340-356.

[11] Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Cubero J, Achor DS . Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri: Factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Mol Plant Pathol 2004; 5: 1-15.

[12] Gottwald T, Irey M . Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker ii: Predictive model estimation of disease spread and area potentially impacted by various eradication protocols following catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress 2007.

[13] Belasque J, Parra-Pedrazzoli AL, Neto JR, Yamamoto PT, Chagas MCM et al. Adult citrus leafminers (Phyllocnistis citrella) are not efficient vectors for Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Plant Dis 2005; 89: 590-594.

[14] Christiano RSC, Dalla Pria M, Jesus WC, Parra JRP, Amorim L et al. Effect of citrus leafminer damage, mechanical damage and inoculum concentration on severity of symptoms of Asiatic citrus canker in Tahiti lime. Crop Prot 2007; 26: 59-65.

[15] Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Riley TD, Bruce MA . Susceptibility of citrus-fruit to bacterial spot and citrus canker. Phytopathology 1992; 82: 452-457.

[16] Malamud F, Torres PS, Roeschlin R, Rigano LA, Enrique R et al. The Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri flagellum is required for mature biofilm and canker development. Microbiol-Sgm 2011; 157: 819-829.

[17] Rigano LA, Siciliano F, Enrique R, Sendin L, Filippone P et al. Biofilm formation, epiphytic fitness, and canker development in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv citri. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20: 1222-1230.

[18] Buttner D, He SY . Type III protein secretion in plant pathogenic bacteria. Plant Physiol 2009; 150: 1656-1664.

[19] Laia ML, Moreira LM, Dezajacomo J, Brigati JB, Ferreira CB et al. New genes of Xanthomonas citri subsp citri involved in pathogenesis and adaptation revealed by a transposon-based mutant library. BMC Microbiol 2009; 9: 12.

[20] Yan Q, Wang N . High-throughput screening and analysis of genes of Xanthomonas citri subsp citri involved in citrus canker symptom development. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012; 25: 69-84.

[21] da Silva ACR, Ferro JA, Reinach FC, Farah CS, Furlan LR et al. Comparison of the genomes of two Xanthomonas pathogens with differing host specificities. Nature 2002; 417: 459-463.

[22] Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ . Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006; 124: 803-814.

[23] Dixon RA, Harrison MJ, Lamb CJ . Early events in the activation of plant defense responses. Ann Rev Phytopathol 1994; 32: 479-501.

[24] Espinosa A, Alfano JR . Disabling surveillance: Bacterial type III secretion system effectors that suppress innate immunity. Cell Microbiol 2004; 6: 1027-1040.

[25] Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T . FLS2: An LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 2000; 5: 1003-1011.

[26] Jones JDG, Dangl JL . The plant immune system. Nature 2006; 444: 323-329.

[27] Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, Caniard A, Jones JDG et al. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 2006; 125: 749-760.

[28] Boller T, Felix G . A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Ann Rev Plant Biol 2009; 60: 379-406.

[29] Kim MG, da Cunha L, McFall AJ, Belkhadir Y, DebRoy S et al. Two Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors inhibit RIM-regulated basal defense in Arabidopsis. Cell 2005; 121(5): 749-759.

[30] Goto M . Citrus Canker. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1992.

[31] Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Civerolo EL, Barrett HC, Hearn CJ . Differential host-range reaction of citrus and citrus relatives to citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot determined by leaf mesophyll susceptibility. Plant Dis 1993; 77: 1004-1009.

[32] Amaral AM, Carvalho SA, Silva LFC, Machado MA . Reaction of genotypes of citrus species and varieties to Xanthomonas citri subsp citri under greenhouse conditions. J Plant Pathol 2010; 92: 519-524.

[33] Cardoso SC, Barbosa-Mendes JM, Boscariol-Camargo RL, Christiano RSC, Bergamin A et al. Transgenic sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) expressing the attacin A gene for resistance to Xanthomonas citri subsp citri. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2010; 28: 185-192.

[34] Mendes BMJ, Cardoso SC, Boscariol-Camargo RL, Cruz RB, Mourao FAA et al. Reduction in susceptibility to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in transgenic Citrus sinensis expressing the rice Xa21 gene. Plant Pathol 2010; 59: 68-75.

[35] Orbovic V, Ananthakrishnan G, Gowda S, Dawson WO, Grosser JW . Genetic engineering of resistance to CTV in grapefruit through Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 2004; 40: 68.

[36] Peltier GL . Susceptibility and resistance to citrus-canker of the wild relative, citrus fruits, and hybrids of the genus Citrus. J Agric Res 1918; 14: 0337-0358.

[37] Prasad MBNV, Singh R, Rekha A, Chand R . Evaluation of lemon cultivars and acid lime X lemon hybrids for resistance to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 1997; 71: 267-272.

[38] Broadbent P, Fahy PC, Gillings MR, Bradley JK, Barnes D . Asiatic citrus canker detected in a pomelo orchard in Northern Australia. Plant Dis 1992; 76: 824-829.

[39] McCollum G, Stange R, Albrecht U, Bowman K, Niedz R et al. Development of a qPCR technique to screen for resistance to Asiatic citrus canker. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 2011; 892: 173-181.

[40] Al-Saadi A, Reddy JD, Duan YP, Brunings AM, Yuan QP et al. All five host-range variants of Xanthomonas citri carry one pthA homolog with 17.5 repeats on citrus, but that determines none determine host-range pathogenicity variation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20: 934-943.

[41] Mavrodieva V, Levy L, Gabriel DW . Improved sampling methods for real-time polymerase chain reaction diagnosis of citrus canker from field samples. Phytopathology 2004; 94: 61-68.

[42] Rodrigues CM, de Souza AA, Takita MA, Kishi LT, Machado MA . RNA-Seq analysis of Citrus reticulata in the early stages of Xylella fastidiosa infection reveals auxin-related genes as a defense response. BMC Genomics 2013; 14: 676.

[43] Mafra V, Kubo KS, Alves-Ferreira M, Ribeiro-Alves M, Stuart RM et al. Reference genes for accurate transcript normalization in citrus genotypes under different experimental conditions. Plos One 2012; 7.

[44] Pfaffl MW . A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: e45.

[45] Wojtaszek P. Oxidative burst: An early plant response to pathogen infection. Biochem J 1997; 322: 681-692.

[46] Zomorodipour A, Andersson SGE . Obligate intracellular parasites: Rickettsia prowazekii and Chlamydia trachomatis. FEBS Lett 1999; 452: 11-15.

[47] Felix G, Duran JD, Volko S, Boller T . Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J 1999; 18: 265-276.

[48] Kobe B, Kajava AV . The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struc Biol 2001; 11: 725-732.

[49] Mizuno S, Osakabe Y, Maruyama K, Ito T, Osakabe K et al. Receptor-like protein kinase 2 (RPK 2) is a novel factor controlling anther development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2007; 50: 751-766.

[50] Wang GD, Long YC, Thomma BPHJ, de Wit PJGM, Angenent GC et al. Functional analyses of the CLAVATA2-like proteins and their domains that contribute to CLAVATA2 specificity. Plant Physiol 2010; 152: 320-331.

[51] Stover EW, McCollum TG . Levels of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and Xanthomonas citri in diverse citrus genotypes and relevance to potential transmission from pollinations. Hortscience 2011; 46: 854-857.

[52] Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P . Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: A perspective for genetic association studies. Mol Genet Genomics 2012; 287: 77-94.

[53] Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U et al. Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32: 656-662.

[54] Khan IA, Roose ML . Frequency and characteristics of nucellar and zygotic seedlings in 3 cultivars on trifoliate orange. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1988; 113: 105-110.

[55] Koltunow AM, Hidaka T, Robinson SP . Polyembryony in citrus - Accumulation of seed storage proteins in seeds and in embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Physiol 1996; 110: 599-609.

[56] Rao MN, Soneji JR, Chen CX, Huang S, Gmitter FG . Characterization of zygotic and nucellar seedlings from sour orange-like citrus rootstock candidates using RAPD and EST-SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes 2008; 4: 113-124.

[57] Xiang C, Roose ML . Frequency and characteristics of nucellar and zygotic seedlings in 12 citrus rootstocks. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 1988; 37: 47-59.

[58] Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL et al. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002; 415: 977-983.

[59] Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T . Flagellin perception: A paradigm for innate immunity. Trends Plant Sci 2002; 7: 251-256.

[60] Torres MA, Jones JDG, Dangl JL . Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol 2006; 141: 373-378.

[61] Chen XY, Liu L, Lee E, Han X, Rim Y et al. The Arabidopsis callose synthase gene GSL8 is required for cytokinesis and cell patterning. Plant Physiol 2009; 150: 105-113.

[62] Denoux C, Galletti R, Mammarella N, Gopalan S, Werck D et al. Activation of defense response pathways by OGs and flg22 elicitors in Arabidopsis seedlings. Mol Plant 2008; 1: 423-445.

[63] Shi Q, Febres VJ, Jones JB, Moore GA . Responsiveness of different citrus genotypes to the Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri-derived pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) flg22 correlates with resistance to citrus canker. Mol Plant Pathol 2014; 16: 507-520.

[64] Durrant WE, Dong X . Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2004; 42: 185-209.

[65] Alexander D, Goodman RM, Gutrella M, Glascock C, Weymann K et al. Increased tolerance to two oomycete pathogens in transgenic tobacco expressing pathogenesis-related protein-1a. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 7327-7331.

[66] Uknes S, Winter AM, Delaney T, Vernooij B, Morse A et al. Biological induction of systemic acquired-resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1993; 6: 692-698.