Subfunctionalization of cation/proton antiporter 1 genes in grapevine in response to salt stress in different organs

Yuanchun Ma , Jiaoyang Wang , Yan Zhong , Fang Geng , Grant R Cramer , Zong-Ming (Max) Cheng

Horticulture Research ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 15031

PDF (2128KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) :15031 DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2015.31
ARTICLE
research-article
Subfunctionalization of cation/proton antiporter 1 genes in grapevine in response to salt stress in different organs
Author information +
History +
PDF (2128KB)

Abstract

Cation/proton antiporter 1 (CPA1) proteins function as regulators of monovalent ions, pH homeostasis, and other developmental processes in plants. Better understanding of the expression and regulation of CPA1 in plant responses to salinity would help the development of scientific practices in crops worldwide. In this report, we characterized all seven CPA1 family genes in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in response to short-term osmotic and NaCl stresses. We found that two of the seven genes have subfunctionalized to be differentially expressed in response to NaCl stress in the early stage in different organs, whereas the other five members seem to play little or no role in this response. Specifically, VIT_19s0090g01480 may control Na+ compartmentalization in grapevine roots; and VIT_05s0020g01960 may influence Na+ transfer in stems. Based on the dynamics of ion concentrations, electrolyte leakage rates, and CPA1 gene expression in root, stem, and leaf tissues under osmotic and NaCl stresses, we suggest how grapevine responds physiologically and molecularly to the osmotic and ion toxicity of NaCl stress in the short term. This work lays a foundation for future research on the CPA1 gene family regarding its evolutionary history and biological functions for modulating salt responses in grapevine.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuanchun Ma, Jiaoyang Wang, Yan Zhong, Fang Geng, Grant R Cramer, Zong-Ming (Max) Cheng. Subfunctionalization of cation/proton antiporter 1 genes in grapevine in response to salt stress in different organs. Horticulture Research, 2015, 2 (1) : 15031 DOI:10.1038/hortres.2015.31

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Cramer G, Urano K, Delrot S et al. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 2011; 11: 1-14.

[2]

Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A . Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003; 218: 1-14.

[3]

Munns R, Tester M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008; 59: 651-681.

[4]

Zhu JK . Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6: 441-445.

[5]

Hasegawa PM . Sodium (Na+) homeostasis and salt tolerance of plants. Environ Exp Bot 2013; 92: 19-31.

[6]

Tester M, Davenport R . Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 2003; 91: 503-527.

[7]

Bassil E, Blumwald E . The ins and outs of intracellular ion homeostasis: NHX-type cation/H+ transporters. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014; 22: 1-6.

[8]

Maser P, Thomine S, Schroeder JI et al. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2001; 126: 1646-1667.

[9]

Brett CL, Donowitz M, Rao R . Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005; 288: C223-C239.

[10]

Fujisawa M, Ito M, Krulwich TA . Three two-component transporters with channel-like properties have monovalent cation/proton antiport activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 13289-13294.

[11]

Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH et al. Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res 2003; 81: 179-192.

[12]

Bouby L, Figueiral I, Bouchette A et al. Bioarchaeological insights into the process of domestication of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman times in Southern France . PLoS One 2013; 8: e63195.

[13]

Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR et al. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour inter-relationships . Aust J Grape Wine Res 2002; 8: 3-14.

[14]

Shani U, Waisel Y, Eshel A et al. Responses to salinity of grapevine plants with split root systems. New Phytol 1993; 124: 695-701.

[15]

Hawker JS, Walker RR . The effect of sodium chloride on the growth and fruiting of Cabernet Sauvignon vines. Am J Enol Viticult 1978; 29: 172-176.

[16]

Gil M, Esteruelas M, González E et al. Effect of two different treatments for reducing grape yield in Vitis vinifera cv Syrah on wine composition and quality: berry thinning versus cluster thinning . J Agr Food Chem 2013; 61: 4968-4978.

[17]

Antcliff AJ, Newman RP, Barrett HC . Variation in chloride accumulation in some American species of grapevine. Vitis 1983; 22: 357-362.

[18]

Oki LR, Lieth JH . Effect of changes in substrate salinity on the elongation of Rosa hybrida L. ‘Kardinal’ stems . Sci Hortic 2004; 101: 103-119.

[19]

Hopper DW, Ghan R, Cramer GR . A rapid dehydration leaf assay reveals stomatal response differences in grapevine genotypes. Hort Res 2014; 1: 2.

[20]

Hanana M, Cagnac O, Yamaguchi T et al. A grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) cation/proton antiporter is associated with berry ripening . Plant Cell Physiol 2007; 48: 804-811.

[21]

Chanroj S, Wang G, Venema K et al. Conserved and diversified gene families of monovalent cation/H+ antiporters from algae to flowering plants. Front Plant Sci 2012; 3: 25.

[22]

Ma Y, Wang J, Zhong Y, Grant RC et al. Genome-wide analysis of the cation/proton antiporter (CPA) super family genes in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) . Plant Omics J 2015; 8: 300-311.

[23]

Epstein E . Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1972: 325-344.

[24]

Blum A, Ebercon A . Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 1981; 21: 43-47.

[25]

Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J . NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L) cultivars differing in salinity resistance . Ann Bot 1996; 78: 389-398.

[26]

Flint HL, Boyce BR, Beattie DJ . Index of injury - a useful expression of freezing injury to plant tissues as determined by the electrolytic method. Can J Plant Sci 1967; 47: 229-230.

[27]

Schmidt AC, Reisser W, Mattusch J, Popp P, Wennrich R . Evaluation of extraction procedures for the ion chromatographic determination of arsenic species in plant materials. J Chromatogr A 2000; 889: 83-91.

[28]

Krachler M, Mohl C, Emons H et al. Influence of digestion procedures on the determination of rare earth elements in peat and plant samples by USN-ICP-MS. J Anal Atom Spectrom 2002; 17: 844-851.

[29]

Krupp E, Milne B, Mestrot A et al. Investigation into mercury bound to biothiols: structural identification using ESI-ion-trap MS and introduction of a method for their HPLC separation with simultaneous detection by ICP-MS and ESI-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 2008; 390: 1753-1764.

[30]

Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J . A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1993; 11: 113-116.

[31]

Gonzalez-Mendoza D, Moreno AQ, Zapata-Perez O . An improved method for the isolation of total RNA from Avicennia germinans leaves . Z Naturforsch C 2008; 63: 124-126.

[32]

Wang M, Vannozzi A, Wang G, et al. Genome and transcriptome analysis of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family . Hort Res 2014; 1: 14016.

[33]

Reid KE, Olsson N, Schlosser J et al. An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development. BMC Plant Biol 2006; 6: 27.

[34]

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001; 25: 402-408.

[35]

Galvez FJ, Baghour M, Hao G et al. Expression of LeNHX isoforms in response to salt stress in salt sensitive and salt tolerant tomato species. Plant Physiol Biochem 2012; 51: 109-115.

[36]

Ye CY, Zhang HC, Chen JH et al. Molecular characterization of putative vacuolar NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes from the salt-resistant tree Populus euphratica . Physiol Plant 2009; 137: 166-174.

[37]

Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Tagiri A et al. Function, intracellular localization and the importance in salt tolerance of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter from rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45: 146-159.

[38]

Xia T, Apse MP, Aharon GS, Blumwald E . Identification and characterization of a NaCl-inducible vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter in Beta vulgaris . Physiol Plant 2002; 116: 206-212.

[39]

Zörb C, Noll A, Karl S et al. Molecular characterization of Na+/H+ antiporters (ZmNHX) of maize (Zea mays L.) and their expression under salt stress . J Plant Physiol 2005; 162: 55-66.

[40]

Cramer G, Ergül A, Grimplet J et al. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 2007; 7: 111-134.

[41]

Pardo JM, Cubero B, Leidi EO et al. Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 2006; 57: 1181-1199.

[42]

Kramer D, Läuchli A, Yeo AR et al. Transfer cells in roots of Phaseolus coccineus: ultrastructure and possible function in exclusion of sodium from the shoot . Ann Bot 1977; 41: 1031-1040.

[43]

Yeo AR, Kramer D, Liuchli A et al. Ion distribution in salt-stressed mature Zea mays roots in relation to ultrastructure and retention of sodium . J Exp Bot 1977; 28: 17-29.

PDF (2128KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/