An optimized procedure for plant recovery from somatic embryos significantly facilitates the genetic improvement of Vitis

Zhijian T Li , Kyung-Hee Kim , Sadanand A Dhekney , Jonathan R Jasinski , Matthew R Creech , Dennis J Gray

Horticulture Research ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 14027

PDF (1232KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) :14027 DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.27
ARTICLE
research-article
An optimized procedure for plant recovery from somatic embryos significantly facilitates the genetic improvement of Vitis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1232KB)

Abstract

Plant regeneration from grapevine (Vitis spp.) via somatic embryogenesis typically is poor. Recovery of plants from Vitis rotundifolia Michx. (muscadine grape) is particularly problematic due to extremely low efficiency, including extended culture durations required for embryo–plant conversion. Poor plant recovery is an obstacle to the selection of improved genetically modified lines. Somatic embryos (SEs) of V. rotundifolia cultivar Delicious (Del-HS) and Vitis vinifera L cultivar Thompson Seedless (TS) were used to identify culture media and conditions that promoted embryo differentiation and plant conversion; this resulted in a two-step culture system. In comparative culture experiments, C2D medium containing 6% sucrose was the most effective, among four distinct formulae tested, for inducing precocious SE germination and cell differentiation. This medium, further supplemented with 4 mM 6-benzylaminopurine (C2D4B), was subsequently determined to enhance post-germinative growth of SE. MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mM 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (MSN) was then utilized to stimulate root and shoot growth of germinated SE. An average of 35% and 80% ‘Del-HS’ and ‘TS’ SE, respectively, developed into plants. All plants developed robust root and shoot systems and exhibited excellent survival following transfer to soil. Over 150 plants of ‘Del-HS’ were regenerated and established within 2.5 months, which is a dramatic reduction from the 6- to 12-month time period previously required. Similarly, 88 ‘TS’ plant lines were obtained within the same time period. Subsequently, seven out of eight Vitis cultivars exhibited significantly increased plant conversion percentages, demonstrating broad application of the two-step culture system to produce the large numbers of independent plant lines needed for selection of desired traits.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhijian T Li, Kyung-Hee Kim, Sadanand A Dhekney, Jonathan R Jasinski, Matthew R Creech, Dennis J Gray. An optimized procedure for plant recovery from somatic embryos significantly facilitates the genetic improvement of Vitis. Horticulture Research, 2014, 1 (1) : 14027 DOI:10.1038/hortres.2014.27

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nookaraju A, Agrawal DC . Enhanced tolerance of transgenic grapevines expressing chitinase and B-1,3-glucanase genes to downy mildew. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012; 111: 15-28.

[2]

Alonso AD, O’Neil MA . Muscadine grapes, food heritage and consumer images: implications for the development of a tourism product in Southern USA. Tour Plan Dev 2012; 9: 213-229.

[3]

Lopez-Perez AJ, Velasco L, Pazos-Navarro M et al. Development of highly efficient genetic transformation protocols for table grape sugraone and crimson seedless at low Agrobacterium density. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2008; 94: 189-199.

[4]

Robacker C . Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from muscadine grape leaf explants. Hort Sci 1993; 28: 53-55.

[5]

Gray DJ . Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) cultivars. Am J Bot 1992; 79: 542-546.

[6]

Gray DJ, Benton. In vitro micropropagation and plant establishment of muscadine grape cultivars (Vitis rotundifolia). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 1991; 27: 7-14.

[7]

Gray DJ, Dhekney SA, Li ZT et al. Genetic engineering of grapevine and progress towards commercial deployment. In: Mou B, Scorza R (ed.). Transgenic Horticultural Crops: Challenges and Opportunities. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011: 317-332.

[8]

Gray DJ, Li ZT, Dhekney SA et al. ‘Del-Hs’: an early-ripening self-fertile, multipurpose black-fruited muscadine grape. Hort Sci 2009; 44: 200-201.

[9]

Pastrana-Bonilla E, Akon CC, Sellappan S et al. Phenolics content and antioxidant capacity of muscadine grapes. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51: 5497-5503.

[10]

Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH . In vitro propagation of paradox walnut rootstock. Hort Sci 1984; 19: 507-509.

[11]

Mortensen JA, Harris JW . Alachua Muscadine Grape. Circular (Florida Agricultural Experiment Station), Alachua County, FL: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Florida, 1990.

[12]

God JM, Tate P, Larcom LL . Anticancer effects of four cultivars of muscadine grape. J Med Food 2007; 10: 54-59.

[13]

Burrow MD, Chlan CA, Sen P et al. High frequency generation of transgenic tobacco plants after modified leaf disk cocultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1990; 8: 24-139.

[14]

Musingo MN, Sims CA, Bates RP et al. Changes in ellagic acid and other phenols in muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) juices and wines. Am J Enol Vitic 2001; 52: 109-114.

[15]

Greenspan P, Bauer JD, Pollock SH et al. Antiinflammatory properties of the muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia). J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53: 8481-8484.

[16]

Chee R, Pool RM, Bucher D . A method for large scale in vitro propagation of Vitis. NY Food Life Sci Bull 1984; 109: 1-9.

[17]

Vidal RJ, Rama J, Taboada L et al. Improved somatic embryogenesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) with focus on induction parameters and efficient plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2009; 96: 85-94.

[18]

Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Gray DJ . Factors influencing induction and maintenance of Vitis rotundifolia Michx. embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2011; 105: 175-180.

[19]

Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Gray DJ . Grapevine engineered to express cisgenic Vitis vinifera thaumatin-like protein exhibit fungal disease resistance. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 2011; 47: 458-466.

[20]

Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Dutt M et al. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cultures and plant regeneration in Vitis rotundifolia Michx. (Muscadine Grape). Plant Cell Rep 2008; 27: 865-872.

[21]

Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Compton ME et al. Optimizing initiation and maintenance of Vitis embryogenic cultures. Hort Sci 2009; 44: 1400-1406.

[22]

Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Zimmerman TW et al. Factors influencing genetic transformation and plant regeneration of Vitis. Am J Enol Vitic 2009; 60: 285-292.

[23]

Percival SS, Sims CA, Talcott ST . Immune Benefits of Consuming Red Muscadine Wine. Naples, FL: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS. Accessed April, 2014 at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fs085

[24]

Talcott ST, Lee JH . Ellagic acid and flavonoid antioxidant content of muscadine wine and juice. J Agric Food Chem 2002; 50: 3186-3192.

[25]

Murashige T, Skoog FA . A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962; 15: 473-497.

[26]

Olien WC . Muscadine-a classic southeastern fruit. Hort Sci 1990; 25: 726-831.

[27]

Li Z, Jayasankar S, Gray DJ . Expression of a bifunctional green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion marker under the control of three constitutive promoters and enhanced derivatives in transgenic grape (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci 2001; 160: 877-887.

[28]

Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Dutt M et al. An improved protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2008; 93: 311-321.

[29]

Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Dutt M et al. Optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2006; 42: 220-227.

PDF (1232KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/