Localised and tree total crop loads influence trunk growth, return fruit set, yield, and fruit quality in apples

Abstract

Localised fruit thinning strategies must be investigated to improve precision crop load management in narrow-canopy, multileader apple trees. This study aimed to determine the effects of within-leader and tree total crop load on leaders’ and trunk’s growth, fruit set, yield, and fruit quality in ‘Ruby Matilda’ apples (marketed as Pink Lady) over three years. Different crop loads were imposed on two leaders (primary and secondary) of bi-axis trees. Leader and trunk relative growth rate, return fruit set, yield, and fruit quality parameters at harvest were measured. High within-leader crop loads led to a significant increase in yield and reductions in trunk growth, return fruit set, and deterioration of fruit quality parameters except for flesh firmness and starch index. Similar trends were observed in whole-tree relationships. High crop load in secondary leaders had moderate negative effects on trunk growth, yield, and fruit mass of primary leaders; it only marginally affected their return fruit set and had no significant effect (p>0.05) on their fruit quality. A crop load of 6.8 fruit no. cm ² of leader cross-sectional area was estimated to achieve a relatively consistent return fruit set within the same leader. At a whole-tree level, a similar crop load (6.9 fruit no. cm ² of trunk cross-sectional area) produced a consistent return fruit set despite its higher variability. These crop loads produced high yields (120 and 111 t ha ¹, respectively) and good quality fruit. Using individual leaders as management units is recommended to simplify operations and reduce variability.

Keywords

Bi-axis trees / Biennial bearing / Fruit number / Malus domestica Borkh. / Pink Lady

References

[1]	Anthony B, Serra S, Musacchi S. Optimizing crop load for new apple cultivar: “WA38.” Agronomy-Basel. 2019;9:107. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020107.
[2]	Apple and Pear Australia Ltd. Industry stats [WWW Document]. 2021. https://apal.org.au/programs/industry-data/industry-stats/. Accessed 16 May 2023.
[3]	Avery DJ. Comparisons of fruiting and deblossomed maiden apple trees, and of non-fruiting trees on a dwarfing and an invigorating rootstock. New Phytol. 1969;68:323–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1969.tb06444.x.
[4]	Avery DJ. Effects of fruiting on the growth of apple trees on four rootstock varieties. New Phytol. 1970;69:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1970.tb04045.x.
[5]	Awad MA, De Jager A, Dekker M, Jongen WMF. Formation of flavonoids and chlorogenic acid in apples as affected by crop load. Sci Hortic. 2001;91:227–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00266-7.
[6]	Bangerth KF. Floral induction in mature, perennial angiosperm fruit trees: similarities and discrepancies with annual/biennial plants and the involvement of plant hormones. Sci Hortic. 2009;122:153–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.014.
[7]	Belhassine F, Martinez S, Bluy S, Fumey D, Kelner JJ, Costes E, et al. Impact of within-tree organ distances on floral induction and fruit growth in apple tree: implication of carbohydrate and gibberellin organ contents. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01233.
[8]	Bortolotti G, Perulli G, Boini A, Bresilla K, Bonora A, Venturi M, et al. Individual upright physiological traits in an apple “Guyot” training system. Acta Horticulturae. 2022;1346:353–7. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1346.44.
[9]	Bureau of Meterology. Climate Data Online [WWW Document]. Commonw Aust. 2023. https://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
[10]	Dorigoni A, Lezzer P, Dallabetta N, Serra S, Musacchi S. Bi-axis: an alternative to slender spindle for apple1 orchards. Acta Horticulturae. 2011;903:581–8. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.903.80.
[11]	Embree CG, Myra MTD, Nichols DS, Wright AH. Effect of blossom density and crop load on growth, fruit quality, and return bloom in “honeycrisp” apple. HortScience. 2007;42:1622–5. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.42.7.1622.
[12]	Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. Qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04.
[13]	Fathizadeh Z, Aboonajmi M, Hassan-Beygi SR. Nondestructive methods for determining the firmness of apple fruit flesh. Inform Process Agric. 2021;8:515–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.12.002.
[14]	Francesconi AHD, Watkins CB, Lakso AN, Nyrop JP, Barnard J, Denning SS. Interactions of European red mite and crop load on maturity and quality, mineral concentrations, and economic value of “starkrimson delicious” apples. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1996;121:967–72. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.121.5.967.
[15]	Gallucci M. GAMLj: general analyses for linear models in in Jamovi. Version 3.0.0 [software]. 2019.
[16]	Greene DW, Autio WR, Erf JA, Mao ZY. Mode of action of benzyladenine when used as a chemical thinner on apples. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1992;117:775–9. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.117.5.775.
[17]	Guitton B, Kelner JJ, Velasco R, Gardiner SE, Chagné D, Costes E. Genetic control of biennial bearing in apple. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:131–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err261.
[18]	Islam MS, Scalisi A, O’Connell MG, Morton P, Scheding S, Underwood J, et al. A ground-based platform for reliable estimates of fruit number, size, and color in stone fruit orchards. HortTechnology. 2022;32:510–22. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05098-22.
[19]	Link H. Significance of flower and fruit thinning on fruit quality. Plant Growth Regul. 2000;31:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006334110068.
[20]	McGuire RG. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience. 1992;27:1254–5. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.12.1254.
[21]	Meland M. Effects of different crop loads and thinning times on yield, fruit quality, and return bloom in Malus × domestica Borkh. ‘Elstar.’ J Horticult Sci Biotechnol. 2009;84:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2009.11512607.
[22]	Milyaev A, Kofler J, Moya YAT, Lempe J, Stefanelli D, Hanke MV, et al. Profiling of phytohormones in apple fruit and buds regarding their role as potential regulators of flower bud formation. Tree Physiol. 2022;42:2319–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/TREEPHYS/TPAC083.
[23]	Mpelasoka BS, Behboudian MH, Ganesh S. Fruit quality attributes and their interrelationships of “Braeburn” apple in response to deficit irrigation and to crop load. Gartenbauwissenschaft. 2001;66:247–53.
[24]	Musacchi S, Serra S. Apple fruit quality: overview on pre-harvest factors. Sci Hortic. 2018;234:409–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.057.
[25]	Nichols D, Embree C, Cline J, Ju HY. Blossom and fruitlet thinners affect crop load, fruit weight, seed number, and return bloom of ‘northern spy’ apple. HortScience. 2004;39:1309–12. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1309.
[26]	Palmer JW, Giuliani R, Adams HM. Effect of crop load on fruiting and leaf photosynthesis of ‘Braeburn’/M.26 apple trees. Tree Physiol. 1997;17:741–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.11.741.
[27]	Peavey M, Goodwin I, McClymont L, Chandra S. Effect of shading on red colour and fruit quality in blush pears “ANP-0118” and “ANP-0131.” Plants-Basel. 2020;9:206. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020206.
[28]	Reddy P, Plozza T, Ezernieks V, Stefanelli D, Scalisi A, Goodwin I, et al. Metabolic pathways for observed impacts of crop load on floral induction in apple. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:6019. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS23116019.
[29]	Saei A, Tustin DS, Zamani Z, Talaie A, Hall AJ. Cropping effects on the loss of apple fruit firmness during storage: the relationship between texture retention and fruit dry matter concentration. Sci Hortic. 2011;130:256–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.008.
[30]	Scalisi A, O’Connell MG, Pelliccia D, Plozza T, Frisina C, Chandra S, et al. Reliability of a handheld bluetooth colourimeter and its application to measuring the effects of time from harvest, row orientation and training system on nectarine skin colour. Horticulturae. 2021;7:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/HORTICULTURAE7080255.
[31]	Scalisi A, O’Connell MG, Islam MS, Goodwin I. A fruit colour development index (CDI) to support harvest time decisions in peach and nectarine orchards. Horticulturae. 2022;8:459. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050459.
[32]	Schechter I, Proctor JTA, Elfving DC. Apple fruit removal and limb girdling affect fruit and leaf characteristics. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1994;119:157–62. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.119.2.157.
[33]	Serra S, Leisso R, Giordani L, Kalcsits L, Musacchi S. Crop load influences fruit quality, nutritional balance, and return bloom in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple. Hortscience. 2016;51:236–44. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.51.3.236.
[34]	Staples MR, Staples JR. Apple tree named ‘Ruby Pink’. USPP16725P2. 2006.
[35]	Stefanelli D, Plozza T, Flachowsky H, Wünsche JN. Young apple tree responses to crop load. Acta Hortic. 2018;1229:221–8. https://doi.org/10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2018.1229.34.
[36]	Stopar M, Bolcina U, Vanzo A, Vrhovsek U. Lower crop load for cv jonagold apples (Malus × domestica Borkh.) increases polyphenol content and fruit quality. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:1643–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/JF011018B.
[37]	Unuk T, Cmelik Z, Stopar M, Zadravec P, Tojnko S. Impact of early cropping on vegetative development and productivity of “golden delicious” apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh). Eur J Hortic Sci. 2008;73:205–9.
[38]	Webster DH, Brown GL. Trunk growth of apple tree as affected by crop load. Can J Plant Sci. 1980;60:1383–91. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps80-193.
[39]	Williamson VG, Frisina C, Tareen MN, Stefanelli D. Storage performance of two ‘Pink Lady?’ clones differs, but 1-MCP treatment is beneficial, regardless of maturity at harvest. Sci Hortic. 2018;235:142–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.006.
[40]	Win NM, Lee D, Song YY, Park J, Cho YS, Park MY, et al. Effect of crop load on the yield, fruit quality, and fruit mineral contents of ‘RubyS’ apples. Korean J Agric Sci. 2022;49:421–30. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20220036.
[41]	Wünsche JN, Ferguson IB. Crop load interactions in apple. In: Janick J, editor. Horticultural Reviews. 2004. p. 231–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650882.ch5.
[42]	Wünsche JN, Greer DH, Laing WA, Palmer JW. Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple. Tree Physiol. 2005;25:1253–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/TREEPHYS/25.10.1253.
[43]	Yang W, Ma X, Ma D, Shi J, Hussain S, Han M, et al. Modeling canopy photosynthesis and light interception partitioning among shoots in bi-axis and single-axis apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh). Trees-Struct Funct. 2021;35:845–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02085-z.

Funding

Hort Innovation(AP19003); Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action(6472)