The role of “treatment unfeasibility” in the multiparametric, multidisciplinary, and expert evaluation of HCC patients
Ilaria Govoni , Virginia Padoan , Alessandro Vitale , Maria Rendina , Michele Finotti , Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri , Marco Brolese , on behalf of the HCC Special Interest Group of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
Hepatoma Research ›› 2026, Vol. 12 -10.
The Multiparametric Therapeutic Hierarchy (MTH) has been proposed as an evolution of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm to better reflect the complexity of real-world hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management. While the BCLC often assumes idealised conditions, the MTH explicitly incorporates “treatment unfeasibility” as a variable in clinical decision-making, a concept this review seeks to examine and refine. We propose that unfeasibility should not be limited to absolute contraindications but should be understood as a multidimensional construct comprising four interacting dimensions: (1) Technical Feasibility; (2) Resources; (3) Equity; and (4) Values and Acceptability. This concept of unfeasibility adapts the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework, originally designed for population-level guideline development, to individual-level clinical reasoning. At the point of care, the five EtD domains (Feasibility, Resources, Acceptability, Equity, and Values and Preferences) converge into a unified assessment of treatment feasibility for the specific patient. A precise mapping between our four dimensions and the original GRADE domains is provided. This approach is complementary to, rather than a departure from, GRADE methodology and is particularly relevant in settings characterised by low or very low certainty of evidence. Our analysis reveals a recurring inverse relationship between therapeutic efficacy and feasibility: the most effective treatments, such as liver transplantation, are often constrained by technical, resource-related, and systemic barriers. This tension results in widespread undertreatment across the HCC population. By defining unfeasibility as a key element of expert reasoning, this framework aims to enhance transparency in how multidisciplinary tumour boards weigh multiple considerations when making individualised treatment decisions under uncertainty, without prescribing decision rules or treatment recommendations.
Hepatocellular carcinoma / multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy / multidisciplinary decision-making / treatment unfeasibility / GRADE evidence-to-decision framework / patient-centred care / healthcare disparities
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Vitale A, Cabibbo G, Iavarone M, et al.; HCC Special Interest Group of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. Personalised management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy concept. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:e312-22. |
| [5] |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al.; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-6. PMCID:PMC2335261 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Oniscu GC, Muller E, Wilson C, Horton R; ESOT-Lancet Commission on Transplantation. The ESOT-lancet commission on transplantation: a new vision for global sustainability, innovation, and equity in organ transplantation. Lancet. 2025;406:313-5. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Serenari M, Lenzi J, Cucchetti A, et al.; HE.RC.O.LE.S. Group. The effect of a liver transplant program on the outcomes of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a nationwide multicenter analysis. Ann Surg. 2023;277:664-71. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol2025;82:315-74 |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
NCCN Guidelines for patients: liver cancer. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/content/PDF/liver-hp-patient.pdf. [Last accessed on 15 Apr 2026]. |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
Ocak G, Rookmaaker MB, Algra A, et al.; SMART Study Group. Chronic kidney disease and bleeding risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk: a cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:65-73. |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
Ebeling Barbier C, Heindryckx F, Lennernäs H. Limitations and possibilities of transarterial chemotherapeutic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.Int J Mol Sci2021;22:13051 PMCID:PMC8658005 |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
Loffroy R, Ronot M, Greget M, et al.; CIRT-FR Principal Investigators. Short-term safety and quality of life outcomes following radioembolization in primary and secondary liver tumours: a multi-centre analysis of 200 patients in France. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44:36-49. PMCID:PMC7728633 |
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
Knavel Koepsel EM, Smolock AR, Pinchot JW, et al.; Expert Panel on Interventional Radiology. ACR appropriateness Criteria® management of liver cancer: 2022 update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022;19:S390-408. |
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
Yau T, Galle PR, Decaens T, et al.; CheckMate 9DW investigators. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 9DW): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2025;405:1851-64. |
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
Cabibbo G, Aghemo A, Lai Q, Masarone M, Montagnese S, Ponziani FR; Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF). Optimizing systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: the key role of liver function. Dig Liver Dis. 2022;54:452-60. |
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |