Immune microenvironment and immunotherapy strategies in MAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma
Hao-Nan Han , Jin-Hu Ma , Jia-Bei Wang , Yao Liu
Hepatoma Research ›› 2025, Vol. 11 : 24
Immune microenvironment and immunotherapy strategies in MAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma
Driven by the global pandemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has emerged as a principal driver of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MAFLD-related HCC (MAFLD-HCC) exhibits distinct pathological features and a unique immune microenvironment, which collectively contribute to its poorer response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to HCC of other etiologies. This review systematically outlines the immune microenvironment in MAFLD-HCC, focusing on the dynamic changes and interactions among dysfunctional CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells, myeloid cells, and B cells, as well as their crosstalk with metabolic reprogramming. These changes collectively result in a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, leading to resistance to ICIs. Addressing the challenges in treating MAFLD-HCC, this paper discusses the current progress in immunotherapy for MAFLD-HCC and explores potential directions for future immunotherapy research.
MAFLD-related HCC / immune microenvironment / immunotherapy
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al.; CONCORD Working Group. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.Lancet2018;391:1023-75 PMCID:PMC5879496 |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al.; NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature.Hepatology2023;78:1966-86 PMCID:PMC10653297 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Fabregat I, Moreno-Càceres J, Sánchez A, et al.; IT-LIVER Consortium. TGF-β signalling and liver disease.FEBS J2016;283:2219-32 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al.; IMbrave150 Investigators. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.N Engl J Med2020;382:1894-905 |
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, et al.; ORIENT-32 study group. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.Lancet Oncol2021;22:977-90 |
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al.; KEYNOTE-224 investigators. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol2018;19:940-52 |
| [111] |
Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, et al.; KEYNOTE-240 investigators. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial.J Clin Oncol2020;38:193-202 |
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
Yau T, Galle PR, Decaens T, et al.; CheckMate 9DW investigators. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 9DW): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet2025;405:1851-64 |
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ, et al.; REACH-2 study investigators. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol2019;20:282-96 |
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
|
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |