Surveillance for patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: how to improve its cost-effectiveness and expand the role of multidisciplinary tumor board?
Lorenzo Lani , Giacomo Zaccherini , Edoardo G. Giannini , Franco Trevisani
Hepatoma Research ›› 2025, Vol. 11 : 9
Surveillance for patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: how to improve its cost-effectiveness and expand the role of multidisciplinary tumor board?
Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves early tumor detection, increases access to curative therapies, and reduces mortality by about 40%. Early diagnosis through surveillance is essential and should be extended to as many at-risk patients as possible to maximize the benefits of multidisciplinary tumor board evaluations. Current guidelines recommend semi-annual abdominal ultrasonography (US), with/without serum alpha-fetoprotein measurement, for patients with cirrhosis and certain subgroups of individuals with pre-cirrhotic chronic liver disease. However, the populations eligible for surveillance include subsets with varying degrees of HCC risk, which may change over time in some individuals. As risk level is a key determinant of cost-effectiveness, the rigid, “one-size-fits-all” strategy appears inadequate. Moreover, certain non-cirrhotic patients - particularly those with advanced liver fibrosis - are currently excluded from surveillance but may benefit from risk stratification to identify those for whom surveillance would be cost-effective. Surveillance strategies must also consider potential harms, and the limitations of US as a screening test. In response, alternative approaches such as biomarkers-based tests and abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging are under investigation. This article reviews the literature advocating for a transition from the current “one-size-fits-all” approach to programs tailored to individual oncological risk (risk-stratified surveillance) or those that also consider the main factors (sex, etiology, phenotype) that influence screening test performance (precision surveillance). Additionally, it presents a seminal proposal for a risk-stratified algorithm designed to optimize cost-effectiveness and the risk-benefit balance by integrating variable screening intervals and modality selection.
Surveillance / hepatocellular carcinoma / precision surveillance / DAA / HBV / HCV / HCC risk
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rapaccini G, et al; Italian Liver Cancer Group. Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patient survival (Italian experience). Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:734-44. |
| [9] |
Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol2018;69:182-236 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea. 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin Mol Hepatol2022;28:583-705 PMCID:PMC9597235 |
| [13] |
Hasegawa K, Takemura N, Yamashita T, et al; committee for Revision of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Tokyo, Japan. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Japan Society of Hepatology 2021 version (5th JSH-HCC Guidelines). Hepatol Res. 2023;53:383-90. |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Carrat F, Fontaine H, Dorival C, et al; French ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort. Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2019;393:1453-64. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Ganne-Carrié N, Chaffaut C, Bourcier V, et al; for CIRRAL Group. Estimate of hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69:1274-83. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Tan DJH, Tamaki N, Kim BK, et al; Global Liver Cancer Consortium. Prevalence of low FIB-4 in MASLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025;61:278-85. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Ding H, Tu H, Qu C, et al; Committee for Prevention and Control of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Committee of Hepatology of Chinese Research Hospital Association, Hepatology Society of Chinese Medical Association, Prevention of Infection Related Cancer (PIRCA) Group, Specialist Committee of Cancer Prevention and Control of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. Guideline for stratified screening and surveillance in patients with high risk of primary liver cancer (2020). HR. 2021;7:17. |
| [38] |
Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).J Hepatol2024;81:492-542 PMCID:PMC11299976 |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Del Poggio P, Olmi S, Ciccarese F, et al; Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) Group. Factors that affect efficacy of ultrasound surveillance for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1927-33.e2. |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
Giannini EG, Sammito G, Farinati F, et al; Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) Group. Determinants of alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for its clinical use. Cancer. 2014;120:2150-7. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
Nahon P, Najean M, Layese R, et al; ANRS CO12 CirVir, ANRS CO22 Hepather, Scientific Committee - Voting members, CIRRAL groups. Early hepatocellular carcinoma detection using magnetic resonance imaging is cost-effective in high-risk patients with cirrhosis. JHEP Rep. 2021;4:100390. PMCID:PMC8683591 |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
EASLTM The Home of Hepatology. EASL policy statement: risk-based surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis. Available from: https://easl.eu/publication/easl-policy-statement-risk-based/. [Last accessed on 11 Mar 2025]. |
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
Azzi J, Dorival C, Cagnot C, et al; ANRS-AFEF Hepather Study group. Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis after sustained virologic response. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022;46:101923. |
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |