The application of artificial intelligence-based tools in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives
Ciro Celsa , Alessio Quartararo , Marcello Maida , Gaetano Giusino , Valeria Gaudioso , Alba Sparacino , Guido Cusimano , Sofia Rao , Alessandro Grova , Roberta Ciccia , Mauro Salvato , Francesco Mercurio , Claudia La Mantia , Gabriele Di Maria , Giuseppe Cabibbo , Calogero Cammà
Hepatoma Research ›› 2025, Vol. 11 : 4
The application of artificial intelligence-based tools in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management, offering promising applications across diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. In histopathology, deep learning models have shown impressive accuracy in differentiating liver lesions and extracting prognostic information from tissue samples. For biomarker discovery, AI techniques applied to multi-omics data have identified novel prognostic signatures and predictors of immunotherapy response. In radiology, convolutional neural networks have demonstrated high performance in classifying hepatic lesions, grading tumors, and predicting microvascular invasion from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Multimodal AI models integrating histopathology, genomics, and clinical data are emerging as powerful tools for risk stratification. Large language models (LLMs) show potential to support clinical decision making and patient education, though concerns about accuracy remain. While AI holds immense promise, several challenges must be addressed, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and regulatory compliance. The successful implementation of AI in HCC care will require ongoing collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and ethicists. As AI technologies continue to evolve, they are expected to enable more personalized approaches to HCC management, potentially improving diagnosis, treatment selection, and patient outcomes. However, it is crucial to recognize that AI tools are designed to assist, not replace, clinical expertise. Continuous validation in diverse, real-world settings will be essential to ensure the reliability and generalizability of AI models in HCC care.
Hepatocellular carcinoma / artificial intelligence / deep learning / precision medicine / radiomics
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Cabibbo G, Aghemo A, Lai Q, Masarone M, Montagnese S, Ponziani FR; Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF). Optimizing systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: the key role of liver function. Dig Liver Dis. 2022;54:452-60. |
| [6] |
Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol2018;69:182-236 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Llovet JM, Villanueva A, Marrero JA, et al; AASLD Panel of Experts on Trial Design in HCC. Trial design and endpoints in hepatocellular carcinoma: AASLD consensus conference. Hepatology. 2021;73 Suppl 1:158-91. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Pecorelli A, Lenzi B, Gramenzi A, et al; Italian LiverCancer (ITA.LI.CA) group. Curative therapies are superior to standard of care (transarterial chemoembolization) for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2017;37:423-33. |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3210. PMCID:PMC7490785 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Zeng Q, Klein C, Caruso S, et al; HCC-AI study group. Artificial intelligence-based pathology as a biomarker of sensitivity to atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:1411-22. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Maida M, Ramai D, Mori Y, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Facciorusso A, Hassan C; and the AI-CORE (Artificial Intelligence COlorectal cancer Research) Working Group. The role of generative language systems in increasing patient awareness of colon cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2024;Online ahead of print. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
World Health Organization. Regulatory considerations on artificial intelligence for health: World Health Organization 2023. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=YHoOEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=+Regulatory+considerations+on+artificial+intelligence+for+health:+World+Health+Organization+&ots=WpgouRrmWW&sig=GNSP3CzM51dMuoZ-AVVwV6C25jc#v=onepage&q=Regulatory%20considerations%20on%20artificial%20intelligence%20for%20health%3A%20World%20Health%20Organization&f=false. [Last accessed on 19 Dec 2024]. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles. [Last accessed on 19 Dec 2024]. |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |