Immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients - a review of current literature
Chao Yin , Tilak Baba , Aiwu Ruth He , Coleman Smith
Hepatoma Research ›› 2021, Vol. 7 : 52
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients - a review of current literature
Immuno-oncology, particularly with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a front-line category of cancer-directed therapy, including in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While liver transplant (LT) offers a potential cure for HCC, the use of ICIs is a topic of safety concern both pre- and post-transplant due to the risk of donor graft rejection. Nonetheless, some scenarios for which the therapeutic effects of ICI may be highly beneficial include the downstaging of unresectable HCC pre-transplant, or the treatment of recurrent HCC and secondary malignancies post-transplant. In this review, we explored the evidence surrounding the use of ICI in the peri-transplant setting, including safety and efficacy. In a comprehensive review of 28 cases of ICI use post-transplant, we found graft rejection in 9 of 28 cases (32%). Some factors that may increase the risk of rejection include younger age, less time between LT and ICI therapy, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the donor graft (particularly when using anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 ICIs). Despite these concerns, we relay a case of successful HCC downstaging with nivolumab and subsequent LT. We also describe several cases of response to ICIs post-LT (7 of 28 cases) among a group that is often heavily pre-treated. We conclude that ICIs are valuable options in the peri-transplant setting that have demonstrated promising efficacy based on case reports. Controlled clinical trials are needed to further investigate the conditions that may allow safe delivery of these therapies.
Immunotherapy / immune checkpoint inhibitors / CTLA-4 inhibitors / PD-1 inhibitors / hepatocellular carcinoma / liver transplant / allograft rejection
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Toni EN, Gerbes AL. Tapering of immunosuppression and sustained treatment with nivolumab in a liver transplant recipient.Gastroenterology2017;152:1631-3 |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Jarroudi O, Ulusakarya A, Almohamad W, Afqir S, Morere JF. Anti-programmed cell death Protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a report of three cases.Cureus2020;12:e11150 PMCID:PMC7586420 |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |