How urban–rural interactions promote sustainable rural development: Evidence from the Chang–Zhu–Tan urban agglomeration, China
Yanhua He , Yi Liu , Xuening Fang
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 100338
How urban–rural interactions promote sustainable rural development: Evidence from the Chang–Zhu–Tan urban agglomeration, China
Promoting positive urban–rural interactions is a key strategy for addressing rural decline and advancing regional sustainable development. This study examines the impacts of urban–rural interactions on rural development and explores their mechanisms for advancing sustainability within urban agglomeration areas. Using the Chang–Zhu–Tan (CZT) urban agglomeration as a case study, with an indicator system to measure urban–rural interactions and rural sustainable development, we analyze the mediating effects of resource flows in the process of urban–rural interactions driving rural sustainability through a mediation model. The results show that spatial connectivity, industrial convergence, and social integration between urban and rural areas positively contribute to the economic and social sustainability of rural areas. However, urban–rural spatial connectivity and social integration may negatively impact on rural environment. In this process, capital, technology, and labor play significant mediating roles, whereas the influence of land is less pronounced. Based on these findings, we propose several recommendations for strategically leveraging the benefits of urban–rural interactions across various social-ecological contexts while mitigating their drawbacks.
Urban–rural interaction / Rural sustainability / Mediation effect / Chang–Zhu–Tan (CZT) urban agglomeration
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Gachassin, M., Najman, B., Raballand, G., 2010. The Impact of Roads on Poverty Reduc- tion: A Case Study of Cameroon. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
National Science Foundation 2018 National Science Foundation, 2018. Dear colleague letter: NSF/NSFC joint research on environmental sustainability challenges. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18096/nsf18096.jsp (accessed 13 August 2024). |
| [61] |
OECD 2009. Doing Better for Children. OECD, Paris |
| [62] |
OECD 2013. Rural-Urban Partnerships: An Integrated Approach to Economic Development. OECD, Paris |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
UN-Habitat 2019 UN-Habitat. Urban-Rural Linkages: Guiding Principles. Framework for Action to Advance Integrated Territorial Development. UN-Habitat, Nairobi |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |