Real-world prognostic factors for first-line EGFR-TKI efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR 21 L858R mutation

Yan’e Liu , Lu Chen , Xin Zhu , Hua Zhang , Baoshan Cao

Global Medical Genetics ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 100051

PDF (3101KB)
Global Medical Genetics ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) :100051 DOI: 10.1016/j.gmg.2025.100051
Research article
research-article
Real-world prognostic factors for first-line EGFR-TKI efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR 21 L858R mutation
Author information +
History +
PDF (3101KB)

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for the treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation.

Methods The study enrolled patients with advanced EGFR L858R-mutant NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment between January 2019 and April 2024. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors from clinical characteristics and concomitant genetic alterations that influenced progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results According to the study of a cohort of 120 patients, we found that more metastatic organs (≥3 organs), specific metastatic patterns (liver and bone involvement), concurrent TP53 mutations, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) were associated with shorter PFS. And ECOG PS was an independent predictive factor for PFS. Similarly, metastatic organs ≥ 3 (HR, 2.719; 95 % CI, 1.386-5.333; p = 0.004), ECOG PS of 2 (HR, 10.756; 95 % CI, 4.002-28.906; p < 0.001), and body mass index (BMI)>24 kg/m2 (HR, 0.335; 95 % CI, 0.147-0.760; p = 0.009) were associated with worse OS. We also observed that patients harboring TP53 co-mutations demonstrated significantly inferior PFS compared with their TP53 wild-type counterparts (13.7 months vs. 18.8 months; p = 0.006).

Conclusions This study identified several factors significantly associated with worse response to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients with EGFR L858R mutation and respective independent predictive factors for PFS and OS. These findings could enable personalized therapeutic efficacy assessment to facilitate clinical decision-making for EGFR L858R-mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) / Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) / EGFR Exon 21 L858R mutation / Targeted therapy / TP53

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan’e Liu, Lu Chen, Xin Zhu, Hua Zhang, Baoshan Cao. Real-world prognostic factors for first-line EGFR-TKI efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR 21 L858R mutation. Global Medical Genetics, 2025, 12(02): 100051 DOI:10.1016/j.gmg.2025.100051

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Peking University Third Hospital medical science research ethics committee (Ethics Approval Number: M2023746).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yan’e Liu: data curation, data analysis, writing and editing manuscript. Lu Chen: data curation, data analysis, writing and editing manuscript. Xin Zhu: writing and editing manuscript. Hua Zhang: statistical analysis, editing manuscript. Baoshan Cao: conceptualization, reviewing and editing manuscript, funding acquisition.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020AAA0105203).

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.gmg.2025.100051.

References

[1]

H. Meng, et al., Genomic profiling of driver gene mutations in chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Front. Genet. 10 (2019) 1008, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01008.

[2]

C. Corvaja, et al., Advancements in fourth-generation EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: bridging biological insights and therapeutic development, Cancer Treat. Rev. 130 (2024) 102824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102824.

[3]

W.H. Hsu, J.C. Yang, T.S. Mok, H.H. Loong, Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC, Ann. Oncol. 29 (2018) i3-i9, https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx702.

[4]

J. He, Z. Huang, L. Han, Y. Gong, C. Xie, Mechanisms and management of 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKI resistance in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer, Int. J. Oncol. 59 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2021.5270.

[5]

U. Batra, B. Biswas, K. Prabhash, M.V. Krishna, Differential clinicopathological features, treatments and outcomes in patients with exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer, BMJ Open Respir. Res. 10 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001492.

[6]

H. Wang, et al., Different efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and prognosis in patients with subtypes of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta- analysis, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 140 (2014) 1901-1909, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1709-0.

[7]

X. Du, et al., Establishment of prognostic nomograms for predicting the progression free survival of EGFR-sensitizing mutation, advanced lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, Thorac. Cancer 13 (2022) 1289-1298, https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14380.

[8]

Y. Gu, et al., Clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients with different EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single-center ambispective cohort study, Thorac. Cancer 14 (2023) 3147-3160, https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15108.

[9]

J. Fu, et al., Impact of TP 53 mutations on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy and potential treatment strategy, Clin. Lung Cancer 24 (2023) 29-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2022.08.007.

[10]

M.G. Ferrara, et al., Meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of TP 53 co-mutations in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 184 (2023) 103929, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103929.

[11]

A. Choughule, et al., Coexistence of KRAS mutation with mutant but not wild-type EGFR predicts response to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in human lung cancer, Br. J. Cancer 111 (2014) 2203-2204, https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.401.

[12]

B. Lan, N. Zhao, K. Du, B. Leng, Concurrent TP53 mutations predict a poor prognosis of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs treated with TKIs: an updated systematic review and meta- analysis, Oncol. Lett. 24 (2022) 384, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13504.

[13]

Y. Zhang, et al., The co-mutation of EGFR and tumor-related genes leads to a worse prognosis and a higher level of tumor mutational burden in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients, J. Thorac. Dis. 14 (2022) 185-193, https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1921.

[14]

J. Duan, et al., Refined stratification based on baseline concomitant mutations and longitudinal circulating tumor DNA monitoring in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma under gefitinib treatment, J. Thorac. Oncol. 15 (2020) 1857-1870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.020.

[15]

S. Hong, et al., Concomitant genetic alterations with response to treatment and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients With EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer, JAMA Oncol. 4 (2018) 739-742, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0049.

[16]

N. Ochi, et al., The complexity of EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutant cells as assessed by proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, Exp. Cell Res. 424 (2023) 113503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113503.

[17]

E.A. Eisenhauer, et al., New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1), Eur. J. Cancer 45 (2009) 228-247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

[18]

B. Keam, et al., Nomogram predicting clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Cancer Res. Treat. 46 (2014) 323-330, https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.120.

[19]

M. Riihimaki, et al., Metastatic sites and survival in lung cancer, Lung Cancer 86 (2014) 78-84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.020.

[20]

F. Bray, et al., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J. Clin. 68 (2018) 394-424, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

[21]

D. Morgensztern, S.H. Ng, F. Gao, R. Govindan, Trends in stage distribution for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a National cancer database survey, J. Thorac. Oncol. 5 (2010) 29-33, https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c5920c.

[22]

M.G. Choi, et al., Different prognostic implications of hepatic metastasis according to front-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study, Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 10 (2021) 2551-2561, https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-206.

[23]

Y.Y. Chen, et al., Inferior outcome of bone metastasis in non-small-cell-lung-cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, J. Bone Oncol. 29 (2021) 100369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100369.

[24]

F. Yang, Y. Yu, Tumor microenvironment-the critical element of tumor metastasis, Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 18 (2015) 48-54, https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.01.08.

[25]

D.E. Amundson, S. Djurkovic, G.N. Matwiyoff, The obesity paradox, Crit. Care Clin. 26 (2010) 583-596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2010.06.004.

[26]

H. Lennon, M. Sperrin, E. Badrick, A.G. Renehan, The obesity paradox in cancer: a review, Curr. Oncol. Rep. 18 (2016) 56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0539-4.

[27]

H. Wen, et al., Body mass index, weight change, and cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 73 cohort studies, ESMO Open 9 (2024) 102241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102241.

[28]

A. Gupta, et al., Premorbid body mass index and mortality in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lung Cancer 102 (2016) 49-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.10.017.

[29]

J. Wang, et al., Body mass index and mortality in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 72 (2018) 4-17, https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.70.

[30]

Y.M. Chen, et al., Body mass index, weight loss, and mortality risk in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients: a focus on EGFR mutation, Nutrients 13 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113761.

[31]

V.E. Georgakopoulou, et al., Lung cancer and obesity: a contentious relationship (Review), Oncol. Rep. 52 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2024.8817.

[32]

S. Shukla, Z. Babcock, L. Pizzi, L. Brunetti, Impact of body mass index on survival and serious adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 37 (2021) 811-817, https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2021.1900091.

[33]

H. Imai, et al., Evaluation of gefitinib efficacy according to body mass index, body surface area, and body weight in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 79 (2017) 497-505, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3232-2.

[34]

M. Canale, et al., Concomitant TP 53 mutation confers worse prognosis in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with TKIs, J. Clin. Med. 9 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041047.

[35]

H.A. Yu, et al., Concurrent alterations in EGFR-mutant lung cancers associated with resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors and characterization of MTOR as a mediator of resistance, Clin. Cancer Res. 24 (2018) 3108-3118, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2961.

[36]

Y. Kim, et al., Concurrent genetic alterations predict the progression to target therapy in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, J. Thorac. Oncol. 14 (2019) 193-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.150.

[37]

S. Hobor, et al., Mixed responses to targeted therapy driven by chromosomal instability through p 53 dysfunction and genome doubling, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 4871, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47606-9.

PDF (3101KB)

20

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/