A Couple Nagging Interpretive Difficulties in Zhuangzi Studies vis-à-vis William James on the Ethics and Psychology of Belief

John Robert Williams

Front. Philos. China ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 593 -611.

PDF (396KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 593 -611. DOI: 10.3868/s030-008-019-0035-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Couple Nagging Interpretive Difficulties in Zhuangzi Studies vis-à-vis William James on the Ethics and Psychology of Belief

Author information +
History +
PDF (396KB)

Abstract

The present article addresses two lingering questions in the interpretation of the Zhuangzi 莊子—(a) How can one reconcile the scepticism of the Zhuangzi with its positive project(s)? and (b) Who can become a sagely person? The questions are addressed with reference to aspects of William James’ accounts of the ethics and psychology of belief.

Keywords

Zhuangzi / William James / scepticism / ethics of belief / psychology of belief / sagely person

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
John Robert Williams. A Couple Nagging Interpretive Difficulties in Zhuangzi Studies vis-à-vis William James on the Ethics and Psychology of Belief. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(4): 593-611 DOI:10.3868/s030-008-019-0035-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Brill

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (396KB)

884

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/