Filtering Theories of Truth: Compositionality as a Criterion

WANG Wenfang

PDF(317 KB)
PDF(317 KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 156-170. DOI: 10.3868/s030-002-013-0010-2
research-article

Filtering Theories of Truth: Compositionality as a Criterion

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The traditional way to filter out the implausible candidate solutions to the semantic paradoxes is to appeal to the so-called “cost/benefit analyses.” Yet it is often tedious and controversial to carry out such analyses in detail. Facing this, it would be helpful for us to rely upon some principles to filter out at least something, if not everything, from them. The proposal in this paper is thereby rather simple: We may use principles of compositionality as a “filter” for this purpose. The paper has four sections. In Section 2, the author uses the filter to examine Kripke’s fixed-point theory and to thereby show how it works. In Section 3, the author gives more examples from the classical theories of truth to demonstrate the power of the filter. In Section 4, the author addresses the skepticism concerning whether there is any consistent or non-trivial theory of truth that can survive this filtering procedure. A “nearly sufficient” condition for a theory of truth to survive this test is discussed in order to show that at least some consistent or non-trivial theories of truth do indeed survive the filtering procedure.

Keywords

compositionality / semantic paradox / fixed-point theory / classical theory of truth / paracomplete theory / paraconsistent dialetheism

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
WANG Wenfang. Filtering Theories of Truth: Compositionality as a Criterion. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 156‒170 https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-002-013-0010-2

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Brill
PDF(317 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/