Aristotle’s Concept of Potentiality in Metaphysics Book Θ

CAO Qingyun

PDF(418 KB)
PDF(418 KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 550-571. DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0036-4
research-article
research-article

Aristotle’s Concept of Potentiality in Metaphysics Book Θ

Author information +
History +

Abstract

It is controversial whether δύναμις in Metaphysics Book Θ has two distinct senses, one of which is strict, called “power,” and the other is the “more useful sense,” called “potentiality.” This paper argues that there are indeed two senses of δύναμις in Metaphysics Θ, refuting Michael Frede’s “unitarian interpretation.” Distinguished from power, potentiality is neither Aristotelian nature, nor possibility, nor capacity for being, but rather a way of being. This paper examines the ontological meanings and the features of potentiality as a way of being. Basically, potentiality has a dual status, that is, it is being, on the one hand, and not-being on the other. Furthermore, it has a teleological direction toward its correlative actuality, which explains how potentiality ontologically depends on actuality and why actuality is substantially prior to potentiality.

Keywords

Aristotle / potentiality / actuality / priority / teleology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
CAO Qingyun. Aristotle’s Concept of Potentiality in Metaphysics Book Θ. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(4): 550‒571 https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-001-012-0036-4

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Brill
PDF(418 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/