What Does Fodor’s “Anti-Darwinism” Mean to Natural Theology?
XU Yingjin
Front. Philos. China ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 465 -479.
What Does Fodor’s “Anti-Darwinism” Mean to Natural Theology?
In the current dialogue of “science and religion,” it is widely assumed that the thoughts of Darwinists and that of atheists overlap. However, Jerry Fodor, a full-fledged atheist, recently announced a war against Darwinism with his atheistic campaign. Prima facie, this “civil war” might offer a chance for theists: If Fodor is right, Darwinistic atheism will lose the cover of Darwinism and become less tenable. This paper provides a more pessimistic evaluation of the situation by explaining the following: Fodor’s criticism of adaptationism (as the backbone of Darwinism), viz., his refutation of any counterfactual-supporting laws on the macro-evolutionary level, implies that a law-maker is dispensable on this level. This will either encourage skepticism against the omniscience (at least that concerning the future of macro-evolution) of the Creator, or render the notion of God less appealing.
adaptationism / algorithm / atheism / counterfactual-supporting laws / Darwinism / Fodor / law-maker / natural theology
Higher Education Press and Brill
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
PDF
(569KB)
