Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations:A Comment on Kim’s Theory of Supervenience

CHEN Xiaoping

PDF(497 KB)
PDF(497 KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 316-333. DOI: 10.1007/s11466-011-0141-7
research-article

Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations:A Comment on Kim’s Theory of Supervenience

Author information +
History +

Abstract

“Supervenience” was first used by Donald Davidson to describe the dependent and independent relationships between the mental and the physical. Jaegwon Kim presented a more precise definition, distinguishing between three types of supervenience: weak, strong and global. Kim further proved that strong and global supervenience are equivalent. However, three years later, Kim argued that strong supervenience is stronger than global supervenience, while weak supervenience and global supervenience are independent of each other. This paper demonstrates that Kim’s conclusion that weak supervenience and global supervenience are independent of each other is wrong. The strength of strong, weak and global supervenience decreases in turn with the latter entailed by the former. This paper also corrects some defects in Kim’s argument and his formulation of strong and weak supervenience, and then further explores the relationship between the three types of supervenience and their philosophical significance. It also classifies other terms of supervenience such as layered supervenience, macro-micro supervenience, and mereological superveniece as relationships of the strong, weak and global.

Keywords

supervenience / mind-body problem / necessity / domain

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
CHEN Xiaoping. Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations:A Comment on Kim’s Theory of Supervenience. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(2): 316‒333 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0141-7

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Brill
PDF(497 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/