Hyperspectral image unmixing algorithm based on endmember-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization
Yan ZHAO, Zhen ZHOU, Donghui WANG, Yicheng HUANG, Minghua YU
Hyperspectral image unmixing algorithm based on endmember-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization
The objective function of classical nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) is non-convexity, which affects the obtaining of optimal solutions. In this paper, we proposed a NMF algorithm, and this algorithm was based on the constraint of endmember spectral correlation minimization and endmember spectral difference maximization. The size of endmember spectral overall-correlation was measured by the correlation function, and correlation function was defined as the sum of the absolute values of every two correlation coefficient between the spectra. In the difference constraint of the endmember spectra, the mutation of matrix trace was slowed down by introducing the natural logarithm function. Combining the image decomposition error with the influences of endmember spectra, in the objective function the projection gradient was used to achieve NMF. The effectiveness of algorithm was verified by the simulated hyperspectral images and real hyperspectral images.
hyperspectral image / unmixing / nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) / correlation / logarithm function
[1] |
Thouvenin P A, Dobigeon N, Tourneret J Y. Hyperspectral unmixing with spectral variability using a perturbed linear mixing model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, 64(2): 525–538
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Heylen R, Scheunders P. A multilinear mixing model for nonlinear spectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(1): 240–251
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Zheng C Y, Li H, Wang Q, Chen C L P. Reweighted sparse regression for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(1):479–488
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Altmann Y, Pereyra M, Bioucas-Dias J. Collaborative sparse regression using spatially correlated supports—application to hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015, 24(12): 5800–5811
|
[5] |
Guillamet D, Vitrià J, Schiele B. Introducing a weighted non-negative matrix factorization for image classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2003, 24(14): 2447–2454
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Pauca V P, Piper J, Plemmons R J. Nonnegative matrix factorization for spectral data analysis. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 2006, 416(1): 29–47
|
[7] |
Miao L, Qi H. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(3): 765–777
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Hoyer P O. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004, 5(1): 1457–1469
|
[9] |
Lu X, Wu H, Yuan Y. Double constrained NMF for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(5): 2746–2758
|
[10] |
Luo W F, Zhong L, Zhang B, Gao L R. Independent component analysis for spectral unmixing in hyperspectral remote sensing image. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30(6): 1628–1633 (in Chinese)
Pubmed
|
[11] |
Wu B, Zhao Y, Zhou X. Unmixing mixture pixels of hyperspectral imagery using endmember constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. Computer Engineering, 2008, 34(22): 229–231
|
[12] |
Chang C, Du Q. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(3): 608–619
|
[13] |
Heinz D C, Chang C. Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(3): 529–545
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Gillis N, Glineur F. Using underapproximations for sparse nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(4): 1676–1687
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Clark R N, Swayze G A. Evolution in imaging spectroscopy analysis and sensor signal-to-noise: an examination of how far we have come. In: Proceedings of The 6th Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, 1996
|
/
〈 | 〉 |