Between social and sustainable: A collaborative wood upcycling design process integrating AI and mixed reality tools

Abstract

The nature—culture divide, a longstanding conceptual separation between human beings and the natural environment, is increasingly challenged by the pressing need to address climate change. This urgency calls for design approaches that can synthesise social and sustainable aspects, creating environmental-user-centric solutions. Our study aimed to bridge this divide by exploring the integration of digital and human crafts, with a focus on wood upcycling furniture as a case study. It investigates the flow of design information, creating an interactive feedback loop between physical and digital domains. To ensure the workflow aligns with stakeholder needs, the study engages professionals interdisciplinarily, including designers, informaticists, and engineers, to collectively test and reflect on the process. The proposed pipeline was then compared with the collaborative pipeline that emerged, incorporating stakeholder perspective to refine the system design. The resulting workflow embraced 3D scanning, AIdriven design generation, VR user scenario simulation, and AR-assisted physical fabrication. The digital and physical furniture prototypes suggest new avenues for design informatics by synthesising objective mathematical decisions with subjective semiotic inputs. By exploring the integration of human and machine crafts in the co-creation process, the reflections contribute to sustainable urban and community construction (SDG 11), revealing potentials for scalability in architectural production.

Keywords

Off-cut wood / Upcycling / Furniture / AI-driven design / Mixed-reality / Participatory design

References

[1] Amaral, M.A. , Perc, M. , Wardil, L. , Szolnoki, A. , da Silva Júnior, E. J. , da Silva, J.K. , 2017. Role-separating ordering in social dilemmas controlled by topological frustration. Phys. Rev. E 95 (3), 032307.

[2] Blahut, S. , Harnoncourt-Fuchs, M.T. , 2023. Mixed reality interactive representations for the assembly of a custom timber tower. In: Dokonal, W., Hirschberg, U., Wurzer, G. (Eds.), Digital Design Reconsidered-Proceedings of the 41st Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2023), vol. 2, pp. 751-760.

[3] DeLong, A.J. , 1971. Dominance-territorial criteria and small group structure. Comp. Group Stud. 2 (3), 235- 266.

[4] Duan, X. , 2021. The development of 'agent-based parametric semiology' as design research program. In: Proceedings of the 2020 DigitalFUTURES: the 2nd International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (CDRF 2020). Springer, Singapore, pp. 144-155.

[5] Goepel, G. , Crolla, K. , 2020. Augmented reality-based collaboration: ARgan, a bamboo art installation case study. In: RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans-Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference, vol. 2, pp. 313-322.

[6] Hanafy, N.O. , 2023. Artificial intelligence's effects on design process creativity: a study on used AI text-to-image in architecture. J. Build. Eng. 80, 107999.

[7] He, A. , 2022. Parks, no recreation: what the future holds for China's contested public spaces. The World of Chinese.

[8] Holt-Lunstad, J. , Smith, T.B. , Layton, J.B. , 2010. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 7 (7), e1000316.

[9] Htet Kyaw, A. , Spencer, L. , Zivkovic, S. , Lok, L. , 2023. Gesture recognition for feedback based mixed reality and robotic fabrication: a case study of the UnLog tower. In: The International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp. 331-345.

[10] Kent, L. , Snider, C. , Gopsill, J. , Hicks, B. , 2021. Mixed reality in design prototyping: a systematic review. Des. Stud. 77, 101046.

[11] Lakmali, R.G.N. , Genovese, P.V. , Abewardhana, A.A.B.D.P. , 2024. Evaluating the efficacy of agent-based modeling in analyzing pedestrian dynamics within the built environment: a comprehensive systematic literature review. Buildings 14 (7), 1945.

[12] Liu, D. , 2022. The key to reviving urban Rivers? Recreation, not regulation. SixthTone.

[13] Manzo, G. , Matthews, T. , 2014. Potentialities and limitations of agent-based simulations. Rev. Fr. Sociol. 55 (4), 653- 688.

[14] Mazzetto, S. , 2024. Interdisciplinary perspectives on agentbased modeling in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: a comprehensive review. Buildings 14 (11), 3480.

[15] McDonough, W. , Braungart, M. , 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.

[16] Ng, P. , Eloy, S. , Raposo, M. , González, A.F. , da Silva, N.P. , Figueiredo, M. , Zuberi, H. , 2024. Challenges and opportunities of using metaverse tools for participatory architectural design processes. Virtual Worlds 3 (3), 283- 302.

[17] Ng, P. , Zhu, S. , Li, Y. , van Ameijde, J. , 2025. Intergenerational cooperation and co-creation in public space design assisted by virtual reality (VR) environments. Archit. Intell. 4 (1), 1- 23.

[18] Norman, D.A. , 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.

[19] Okabe-Miyamoto, K. , Folk, D. , Lyubomirsky, S. , Dunn, E.W. , 2021. Changes in social connection during COVID-19 social distancing: it's not (household) size that matters, it's who you're with. PLoS One 16 (1), e0245009.

[20] Oppenlaender, J. , 2022. The creativity of text-to-image generation. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Academic Mindtrek 22). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 192-202.

[21] Schön, D.A., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.

[22] Schroeder, M. , Foulkes, L. , 2024. Why We Must Tackle Embodied Carbon to Meet Our Climate Goals. World Economic Forum.

[23] Schwarzschachner, H. , Hernandez, S. , 2024. Prolonged carbon storage and CO2 reduction by circular design with wood. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 35 (2), 23- 33.

[24] Singh, J. , Sung, K. , Cooper, T. , West, K. , Mont, O. , 2019. Challenges and opportunities for scaling up upcycling businesses-the case of textile and wood upcycling businesses in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 150, 104439.

[25] Yoshida, H. , Larsson, M. , Igarashi, T. , 2019. Upcycling tree branches as architectural elements through collaborative design and fabrication. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 589-593.

[26] Yu, B. , Fingrut, A. , 2022. Sustainable building design (SBD) with reclaimed wood library constructed in collaboration with 3D scanning technology in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 186, 106566.

[27] Yu, B. , Luo, J. , Shi, Y. , Zhao, M. , Fingrut, A. , Zhang, L. , 2023. Framework for sustainable building design and construction using off-cut wood. NPJ Mater. Sustain. 1 (1), 2.

[28] Zhan, H. , Hwang, B.G. , Jovan, L.W.H. , 2025. Barriers and strategies in implementing design for disassembly and adaptability principles in Singapore: a pathway to circular economy in the construction industry. Sustain. Dev. 33 (3), 3858- 3878.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Higher Education Press and KeAi.