Revealing urban lingering pattern at lake front: A spatial information mapping approach through public participatory GIS

Surabhi Mehrotra , Arshi Parashar , Yogesh K. Garg , Samiksha Muddamwar , Shefna Shihabudeen

Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 180 -193.

PDF (3042KB)
Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) :180 -193. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2025.03.012
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Revealing urban lingering pattern at lake front: A spatial information mapping approach through public participatory GIS
Author information +
History +
PDF (3042KB)

Abstract

"Urban lingering" implies an extended stay of users in urban public spaces, which has physical, emotional, and social benefits. In recent times, lingering in public spaces has been increasingly taken over by sedentary lifestyles and the growing influence of social media. Hence, this paper attempts to identify the key factors contributing to urban lingering in public spaces to enhance users' experiences during their stay. For this, contributing factors to urban lingering were identified from literature and measured in five selected recreational public spaces in Bhopal City, the capital of Madhya Pradesh in India. Relationships between Lingering Factor (LF) and contributing factors were then established for male and female users. Public Participatory Geographic Information System (PPGIS) and questionnaire surveys were employed for spatial mapping and perception modeling. The findings of primary surveys indicate that the feeling of safety, parking availability, pleasing design, and memorability of the public space together strongly influence LF across all user groups (R2 = 0.47, p value < 0.05). Data revealed that for male users, adequately sized spaces and lighting contribute to their lingering behavior (R2 = 0.56, p value < 0.05), whereas for female users, accessibility and activities in public spaces are significant contributors to their lingering (R2 = 0.48, p value < 0.05). The differences in the contributing factors to urban LF between male and female users confirm that users' needs in public spaces thus present variation in preferences across space and the presented approach could be considered in planning infrastructure policies to enhance overall wellbeing.

Keywords

Urban public spaces / Public participation GIS (PPGIS) / Urban planning / Gendered perspectives / Spatial mapping / Urban lingering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Surabhi Mehrotra, Arshi Parashar, Yogesh K. Garg, Samiksha Muddamwar, Shefna Shihabudeen. Revealing urban lingering pattern at lake front: A spatial information mapping approach through public participatory GIS. Front. Archit. Res., 2026, 15(1): 180-193 DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2025.03.012

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdelkarim, S.B. , Ahmad, A.M. , Ferwati, S. , Naji, K. , 2023. Urban facility management improving livability through smart public spaces in smart sustainable cities. Sustainability 15 (23), 16257.

[2]

Azhar, H.M. , Hardilla, D. , Kurniawan, P. , 2021. Public open space as unifying aspect of society: San Francisco city case. IOP Conf.Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 780 (1), 012027.

[3]

Carmona, M. , Hanssen, G.S. , Lamm, B. , Nylund, K. , Saglie, I. , Tietjen, A. , 2019. Public space in an age of austerity. Urban Des. Int. 24 (4), 241- 259.

[4]

Carmona, M. , Heath, T. , Oc, T. , Tiesdell, S. , Carmona, M. , 2003. Public Places-Urban Spaces, 1st ed. Routledge.

[5]

Cattell, V. , Dines, N. , Gesler, W. , Curtis, S. , 2008. Mingling, observing, and lingering: everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health Place 14 (3), 544- 561.

[6]

Chin, T. , Swift, C. , 2019. Mapping urban performance culture: a common ground for architecture and theater. In: Lansiquot, R.D., MacDonald, S.P. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Virtual Place-based Learning. Palgrave Pivot, Cham, pp. 83-98.

[7]

Dupuis, A. , Thorns, D.C. , 1998. Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociol Rev 46 (1), 24- 47.

[8]

Ellaway, A. , Macintyre, S. , Kearns, A. , 2001. Perceptions of place and health in socially contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Stud 38 (12), 2299- 2316.

[9]

Errante, L. , De Capua, A. , 2021. Design for disassembly and the rehabilitation of public housing stock. A case study. TECHNE-J.Technol. Archit. Environ. (22), 181- 191.

[10]

Ewertowski, W. , 2023. Public space in different cultural conditions: the cases of Glasgow and Poznan. Quaest. Geogr. 42 (2), 115- 129.

[11]

Gehl, J. , 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.

[12]

Gehl, J. , Svarre, B. , 2013. How to Study Public Life. Island Press.

[13]

Haas, T. , 2017. Urban Design and Public Space Selected Works(Stockholm).

[14]

Hampton, K.N. , Goulet, L.S. , Albanesius, G. , 2014. Change in the social life of urban public spaces: the rise of mobile phones and women, and the decline of aloneness over 30 years. Urban Stud. 52 (8), 1489- 1504.

[15]

Jacobs, J. , 2016. The Death and Life of Great American Cities.Vintage.

[16]

Kargina, D.N. , Sabirzyanova, A.M. , Sedova, A.V. , 2022. The role of public spaces in the formation of the urban environment. Proceedings of the 33th All-Russian Youth Exhibition of Innovations - Innoexh '22/1.

[17]

Korpela, K. , Hartig, T. , 1996. Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16 (3), 221- 233.

[18]

Low, S. , 2022. Why Public Space Matters. Oxford University Press.

[19]

Malianchuk, P. , 2024. Public spaces: different scales and emphases in Yuri serogin's projects. Archit. Bull. KNUCA (29), 62- 73.

[20]

Mehrotra, S. , Subramanian, D. , Bardhan, R. , Jana, A. , 2021. Effect of surface treatment and built form on thermal profile of open spaces: a case of Mumbai, India. Urban Clim. 35, 100736.

[21]

Mouni Bachtarzi, R. , Alkama, D. , Salah-Salah, H. , 2021. Urban public space in the context of a new era, case of Annaba CityAlgeria. Proc. Int. Conf. Contemp. Aff. Archit. Urban. -ICCAUA 4 (1), 681- 684.

[22]

Parashar, A. , Lakra, H.S. , 2023. Studying public spaces — a systematic literature review. J. Urban.: Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain 1- 32.

[23]

Pineda, V.S. , 2022. What is inclusive and accessible public space? J. Public Space 7 (2), 5- 8.

[24]

Salama, A.M. , Azzali, S. , 2015. Examining attributes of urban open spaces in Doha. Proceed Inst Civil Eng-Urban Design Plan 168 (2), 75- 87.

[25]

Saul, H. , Gursul, D. , Cassidy, S. , Corcoran, R. , 2022. Open spaces and a sense of belonging improve wellbeing. BMJ o1663.

[26]

Schmidt, S. , Németh, J. , 2010. Space, place and the city: emerging research on public space design and planning. J. Urban Des. 15 (4), 453- 457.

[27]

Shrivastava, A. , Mehrotra, S. , 2022. Emerging trends and knowledge domain of research on urban green open spaces and wellbeing: a scientometric review. Rev. Environ. Health 38 (4), 663- 679.

[28]

Shrivastava, A. , Mehrotra, S. , 2024. Measuring disparity in the distribution of ROS in adolescents using Geospatial analysis. J.Urban Plann. Dev. 150 (4), 04024037.

[29]

[30]

Vázquez, M. , 2015. Public spaces and community establishment. Nova Scientia 7 (14), 495- 510.

[31]

Wakefield, S. , McMullan, C. , 2005. Healing in places of decline: (re)imagining everyday landscapes in Hamilton, Ontario. Health Place 11 (4), 299- 312.

[32]

Whyte, W.H. , 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

PDF (3042KB)

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/