Northern Scotland's advanced dry-stone Iron-Age brochs, also known as broch towers, exhibit a relatively advanced technological culture. However, the uncertainty prevails because there is no consensus on a standard broch scheme, and additional archaeological research is required. A typological analysis of the plans and sections of brochs can uncover potential hidden architectural connections among features such as staircases, entrances, and central areas. Examining the architecture of Scottish brochs illustrates the decision-making process for each element, which a standard broch model influences.
This study found that brochs are not merely replicas of ordinary buildings but rather constructions that adhere to a specific concept, a set design, a method of organizing living spaces, and a blend of practical construction techniques. From the critical conservation viewpoint, this paper argues that conserving brochs should involve both archaeological and architectural values, treating the monuments as typological collections that should differ from conserving a single site. Thus, the conservation practice should aim at the readable integrity of these architectural features in the context of continuous fabric modifications, where typological methods have been used to initiate a discussion on how architects engage in preserving brochs with archaeologists.
| [1] |
Armit, I. , 1992. The Atlantic Scottish Iron Age: five levels of chronology. Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scotl. 121, 181- 214.
|
| [2] |
Armit, I. , 2003. Towers in the North: the Brochs of Scotland. Tempus Publishing.
|
| [3] |
Avrami, E. , Mason, R. , 2019. Mapping the issue of values. In: Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R., Myers, D. (Eds.), Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions. Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 9-33.
|
| [4] |
Barber, J. , 2017. Approaching the Mind of the Builder: Analysis of the Physical, Structural and Social Constraints on the Construction of the Broch Towers of Iron Age Scotland. The University of Edinburgh.
|
| [5] |
Cavers, G. , Hudson, G. , 2010. Caisteal Grugaig, Totaig Archaeological Survey Report. AOC Archaeology Group.
|
| [6] |
Fojut, N. , 1981. Is Mousa a broch? Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scot. 111, 220- 228.
|
| [7] |
Gentry, K. , Smith, L. , 2019. Critical heritage studies and the legacies of the late-twentieth century heritage canon. Int. J.Herit. Stud. 25 (2), 123- 145.
|
| [8] |
Graham, A. , 1949. Some observations on the brochs. Proc. Soc.Antiq. Scotl. 81, 48- 99.
|
| [9] |
Harding, D. , 2004. The Iron Age in North Britain: Celts and Romans, Natives and Invaders. Routledge.
|
| [10] |
Harrington, J.C. , 1965. Archaeology and the historical society.American Association for State and Local History.
|
| [11] |
Harvey, D. , 2001. Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. Int. J. Herit.Stud. 7 (4), 319- 338.
|
| [12] |
Hedges, J. , Bell, B. , 1980. That tower of Scottish prehistory—the broch. Antiquity 54 (211), 87- 94.
|
| [13] |
Historic Environment Scotland , 2022. Portal. Historic environment.scot.ICOMOS, 1999. Charter on the built vernacular heritage.
|
| [14] |
Liu, C. , 2024. Critical conservation paradigms of architectural heritage based on value systems. Heritage Architecture 33 (1), 1- 7.
|
| [15] |
Liu, C. , Theodossopoulos, D. , 2021. Conservation beyond consolidation for prehistoric monuments: finding narratives from archaeology to architecture for Scottish brochs. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, pp. 990-1001.
|
| [16] |
Mackie, E.W. , 2002. The roundhouses, brochs and wheelhouses of Atlantic Scotland c.700 BCeAD 500: architecture and material culture. Archaeopress.
|
| [17] |
MacKie, E.W. , 2010. The broch cultures of Atlantic Scotland. Part 2.The middle Iron Age: high noon and decline c.200 BCeAD 550. Oxf.J. Archaeol. 29 (1), 89- 117.
|
| [18] |
Mason, R. , 2002. Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. In: Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage (Research Report). Getty Conservation Institute.
|
| [19] |
Parker-Pearson, M. , Sharples, N. , 1999. Between Land and Sea: Excavations at Dun Vulan, South Uist. Sheffield Academic Press.
|
| [20] |
Philokyprou, M. , 2015. Continuities and discontinuities in the vernacular architecture. Am. J. Archaeol. 1 (2), 111- 120.
|
| [21] |
Quatremère de Quincy, A.C. , 1832. Dictionnaire Historique D'Architecture Comprenant Dans Son Plan Les Notions Historiques, Descriptives, Archæologiques, Biographiques, Théoriques, Didactiques Et Pratiques De Cet Art (Tome Premier). Librairie d'Adrien Le Clere et Cie.
|
| [22] |
Riegl, A. , 1982. The modern cult of monuments: its character and its origin (K. W. Forster & D. Ghirardo, Trans.). Oppositions 25, 21-51 (Original work published 1903).
|
| [23] |
Romankiewicz, T. , 2011. The complex roundhouses of the Scottish Iron Age: an architectural analysis of complex Atlantic roundhouses (brochs and galleried duns), with reference to wheelhouses and timber roundhouses (Vols. 1-2).Archaeopress.
|
| [24] |
Scarre, C. , 1979. The ancient monuments and archaeological areas act 1979. Antiquity 53 (209), 219- 222.
|
| [25] |
South, S. , 1976. The role of the archaeologist in the conservationpreservation process. In: Preservation and Conservation: Principles and Practices. The Preservation Press.
|
| [26] |
Winter, T. , 2012. Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 19 (6), 532- 545.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.
PDF
(3605KB)
