The appropriation of autopoiesis in architecture

Abstract

This study investigates the merits of the cross-disciplinary appropriation of the theory of autopoiesis in Patrik Schumacher’s The Autopoiesis of Architecture. In this two-volume work, Schumacher builds upon Luhmann’s sociological adoption of Maturana et al.’s biological theory of autopoiesis. This lineage of repeated appropriation raises questions about the merits of the cross-disciplinary appropriations of natural-scientific theory in architecture in general and the appropriation of autopoiesis in architectural theory in particular. Specifically, what are the merits of Schumacher’s appropriation of the theory of autopoiesis? In this article, we develop and apply a text analysis method drawing on discourse analysis, close reading, visual interpretation, and “inference to the best explanation” to analyse a set of three pertinent samples from The Autopoiesis of Architecture. Our analysis, using previously established categorisations of language use and merits of theory appropriation, shows that Schumacher employs various modes of language use in The Autopoiesis of Architecture to reference both prior instances of autopoiesis. These ambiguities serve to achieve merits that, in many cases, seem to benefit the author rather than his readers.

Keywords

Autopoiesis / Architectural theory / Theory appropriation / Metaphor

References

[1] Ahuja, A. , 2021. Kéré architecture-designed Benin National Assembly mimics the African palaver tree.

[2] Barthes, R. , 1977. Image, Music, Text. Fontana Press, London.

[3] Blok, V. , Gremmen, B. , 2016. Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 29, 203- 217.

[4] Bunnell, P. , Riegler, A. , 2022. A plurality of perspectives: Maturana's impact on science and philosophy. Constructivist Foundations 18, 1- 4.

[5] Burr, V. , 1995. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. Routledge, London.

[6] Buš P. , Treyer, L. , Schmitt, G. , 2017. Urban autopoiesis: towards adaptive future cities. In: Janssen, P., Loh, A., Raonic, A., Schnabel, M.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference, the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA). Suzhou, pp. 695-704.

[7] Collins, P. , 1998. Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950, second ed. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston and London and Ithaca.

[8] Fairclough, N. , 1989. Language and Power. Longman, London and New York.

[9] Fischer, T. , 2019. Kybernetik. In: Schöler, T., Maibaum, J., Höltgen, S., Fischer, T. (Eds.), Medientechnisches Wissen: Band 2: Informatik, Programmieren, Kybernetik. DeGruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, pp. 274-433.

[10] von Foerster, H. , Pörksen, B. , 1998. Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Carl Auer Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg.

[11] Forty, A. , 1999. "Spatial mechanics": scientific metaphors in architecture. In: Galison, P., Thomson, E. (Eds.), The Architecture of Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 213-233.

[12] Forty, A. , 2000. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. Themes and Hudson, New York.

[13] Gill, R. , 2000. Discourse Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 172-190.

[14] Horvath, A.S. , 2022. How we talk(ed) about it: ways of speaking about computational architecture. Int. J. Architect. Comput. 20, 150- 175.

[15] Iklé F.C. , 1958. The Social Impact of Bomb Destruction. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

[16] Johnson, P.A. , 1994. The Theory of Architecture; Concepts, Themes and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[17] Jørgensen, M.W. , Phillips, L.J. , 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.

[18] Karlberg, M. , 2012. Discourse theory and peace. In: Christie, D.(Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltdr, Malden, MA, pp. 1-5.

[19] Kostof, S. , 1991. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings through History. Bulfinch Press, New York and Boston.

[20] Lavanderos, L. , Malpartida, A. , 2023. Life as a relational unit, the process of ecopoiesis. Kybernetes 53, 5047- 5060.

[21] Lawlor, L. Nale, J. , 2014. The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[22] Luhmann, N. , 1982. The Differentiation of Society. Columbia University Press, New York.

[23] Luhmann, N. , 1985. The self-reproduction of law and its limits. In: Teubner, G. (Ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Walter de Gruyter, New York, Berlin, pp. 111-127.

[24] Luhmann, N. , 1986. The Autopoiesis of Social Systems. Sage, London, pp. 172-192.

[25] Luhmann, N. , 1995. Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

[26] Luhmann, N. , 2000. Art as a Social System. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

[27] Luhmann, N. , 2013. Introduction to Systems Theory. Polity, Cambridge.

[28] Lynch, K. , 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. The MIT Press, Cambridge and London.

[29] Markus, T.A. , Cameron, D. , 2002. The Words between the Spaces: Buildings and Language. Routledge, London and New York.

[30] Maturana, H. , Poerksen, B. , 2011. From being to doing. The Origins of the Biology of Cognition, second ed. Carl Auer Systeme, Heidelberg.

[31] Maturana, H. , Varela, F. , 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition; the Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing, Holland and Boston and London.

[32] Maturana, H. , Varela, F. , 1992. The Tree of Knowledge: the Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Revised edition ed. Shambhala Publications, Boston and London.

[33] Melles, G. , 2008. Producing fact, affect and identity in architecture critiques e a discourse analysis of student and faculty discourse interaction. Art Des. Commun. High Educ. 6, 159- 171.

[34] Mingers, J. , 1995. Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis. Plenum Press, New York.

[35] Ostwald, M.J. , 1999. Architectural theory formation through appropriation. Architect. Theor. Rev. 4, 52- 70.

[36] Otto, F. , 1995. IL35 Pneu and Bone. Institute of Lightweight Structures, Stuttgart.

[37] Pasternack, A. , 2008. National stadium: Herzog and de Meuron creates an icon that reaches beyond the olympics. Architect. Rec. 196, 92- 99.

[38] Phillips, N. , Hardy, C. , 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Process of Social Construction. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.

[39] Razeto-Barry, P. , 2012. Autopoiesis 40 years later. a review and a reformulation. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 42, 543- 567.

[40] Rose, S. , 1970. The Chemistry of Life. Pelican, Middlesex.

[41] Sánchez Sotés, G. , 2024. The Appropriation of Autopoiesis in Architecture. Ph.D. thesis. University of Liverpool.

[42] Sánchez Sotés, G. , Herr, C.M. , Fischer, T. , 2022. What to make of the appropriation of autopoiesis in architecture? In: May, C.(Ed.), Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design. Systemic Design Association, Oslo.

[43] Schumacher, P. , 2011. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. Wiley, Chichester.

[44] Schumacher, P. , 2012. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume II: A New Agenda for Architecture. Wiley, Chichester.

[45] Schumacher, P. , 2019. Patrik Schumacher.com.

[46] Scott, B. , 2012. On reading and critiquing Luhmann. Constructivist Foundations 8, 30- 32.

[47] Scott, B. , 2021. Cybernetics for the Social Sciences. Brill Academy, Leiden.

[48] Seidl, D. , 2004. Luhmann's theory of autopoietic social systems. Munich Business Research 2, 1- 28.

[49] Simon, H. , 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artif. Intell. 4, 181- 201.

[50] Sokal, A. , Bricmont, J. , 2003. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science, second ed. ed. Profile Books, London.

[51] Steadman, P. , 2008. The Evolution of Designs; Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts. Routledge, London and New York.

[52] Thagard, P.R. , 1978. The best explanation: criteria for theory choice. J. Philos. 75, 76- 92.

[53] Varela, F. , 1996. The early days of autopoiesis: heinz and Chile. Syst. Res. 13, 407- 416.

[54] Varela, F. , 2018. Valparaíso. Autopoiesis: Orígenes de una Idea. Universidad de Valparaíso.

[55] Varela, F. , Goguen, J. , 1978. The arithmetic of closure. Cybern. Syst. 8, 291- 324.

[56] Varela, F. , Maturana, H. , Uribe, R. , 1974. Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5, 187- 196.

[57] Verebes, T. , 2014. Masterplanning the Adaptive City: Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, New York.

[58] Vincent, J.F.V. , Bogatyreva, A. , Bogatyrev, N.R. , Bowyer, A. , Pahl, A.K. , 2006. Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 471- 482.

[59] Weeden, K.A. , 2002. Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. Am. J. Sociol. 108, 55- 101.

[60] Whitaker, R. , 2012. Luhmann's legacy: Illuminating constructivism, or Ill-Luhmann-ized constructs? Constr. Foundations 8, 32- 34.

[61] Wittgenstein, L. , 1961. Notebooks 1914-1916. Harper Torchbooks, New York and Evanston.

[62] Yazici, M. , Durmus, O. , 2022. An analysis of Rem Koolhaas's discourses on architecture and urban design using a corpusbased model. Frontiers of Architectural Research 12, 222- 241.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Higher Education Press and KeAi.