From empty to empowering: Leveraging vacant land for urban socio-ecological resilience

Abstract

Urban vacancy, often seen as a challenge, offers unique opportunities for ecological and social enhancements in cityscapes. This study explores the role of small green spaces in urban resilience, particularly in high-density metropolises, through a social-ecological lens. We began with a critical review to develop and validate a questionnaire, drawing on theoretical frameworks and confirming the derived criteria with twenty-two experts. Key resilience attributes identified for urban landscapes included flexibility, efficiency, activity, connectivity, and diversity. Utilizing the Best-Worst Method (BWM), we discerned the most and least significant of these attributes. The study then employed Hierarchical Bayes analysis via XLSTAT software to analyze questionnaire responses (n = 386, 60.36% female) and calculate the part-worth utility and importance ratings for each attribute. Results highlighted water presence, high tree density, and activity areas as vital attributes for small urban parks. These insights are crucial for landscape architects, emphasizing attributes that enhance park visitation and usability. Additionally, the innovative methodological approach of this study offers a new pathway for research in urban planning and the built environment.

Keywords

Green spaces / Leftover spaces / Social-ecological systems / Preference / Resilience / Urban park

References

[1] Addas, A. , University of Sheffield , 2015. Motivation and attachment in the use of public open spaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Dissertation. University of Sheffield.

[2] Afriyanie, D. , Akbar, R. , Suroso, D.S.A. , 2018. Socio-ecological resilience for urban green space allocation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 145 (1), 012120.

[3] Ahern, J. , 2013. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc. Ecol. 28 (6), 1203- 1212.

[4] Akkerman, A. , Cornfeld, A. , 2010. Greening as an urban design metaphor: looking for the city's soul in leftover spaces. Structurist 30-35.

[5] Bahamonde-Birke, F.J. , Navarro, I. , de Dios Ortúzar, J. , 2017. If you choose to not decide, you still have made a choice. J. Choice Model. 22, 13- 23.

[6] Bahriny, F. , Bell, S. , 2021. Traditional versus modern? Perceptions and preferences of urban park users in Iran. Sustainability 13 (4), 1- 27.

[7] Bowman, A.O. , Pagano, M.A. , 2004. Terra Incognita Vacant Land and Urban Strategies. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC.

[8] Brighenti, A.M. , 2013. In: Brighenti, A.M. (Ed.), Urban Interstices: the Aesthetics and the Politics of the In-Between. Ashgate Publishing Company.

[9] Burkholder, S. , 2012. The new ecology of vacancy: rethinking land use in shrinking cities. Sustainability 4 (12), 1154- 1172.

[10] Carr, S. , Francis, M. , Rivlin, L.G. , Stone, A.M. , 1992. Public Space. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[11] Chandler, D. , Coaffee, J. , 2016. The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.

[12] Chiang, Y.-C. , Li, D. , Jane, H.-A. , 2017. Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses. Landsc. Urban Plann. 167, 72- 83.

[13] Cohen, S.H. , 1997. Perfect union: CBCA marries the best of conjoint and discrete choice models. Mark. Res. 9, 12- 17.

[14] Colding, J. , Gren, Å. , Barthel, S. , 2020. The incremental demise of urban green spaces. Land 9 (5), 162.

[15] Collier, S. , Newell, J.P. , Melissa, S. , 2016. Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc. Urban Plann. 147, 38- 49.

[16] Cooper, C.B. , Dickinson, J. , Phillips, T. , Bonney, R. , 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 12, 11.

[17] Costa, P. , Brito-Henriques, E. , Cavaco, C. , 2021. Interim reuse in urban derelicts: uncovering the community's attitudes and preferences through S.-elicitation. Cities 111, 103103.

[18] Davoudi, S. , 2012. Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? Plann. Theor. Pract. 13 (2), 299- 333.

[19] Davoudi, S. , et al., 2012. Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? "Reframing" resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planni. Plann. Theor. Pract. 13 (2), 299- 333.

[20] Desimini, J. , 2015. Limitations of the temporary: landscape and abandonment. J. Urban Hist. 41 (2), 279- 293.

[21] Doron, G.M. , 2000. The dead zone and the architecture of transgression. City 4 (2), 247- 263.

[22] Drake, L. , Lawson, L.J. , 2014. Validating verdancy or vacancy? The relationship of community gardens and vacant lands in the U.S., Cities. Elsevier 40, 133- 142.

[23] Feliciotti, A. , Romice, O. , Porta, S. , 2016. Design for change: five proxies for resilience in the urban form. Open House Int. 41 (4), 23- 30.

[24] Fields, W. , 2005. Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: the Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis. University of New Orleans.

[25] Folke, C. , 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for socialeecological systems analyses. Global Environ. Change 16 (3), 253- 267.

[26] Foster, J. , 2014. Hiding in plain view: vacancy and prospect in paris' petite ceinture, cities. Elsevier 40, 124- 132.

[27] Gallopín, G.C. , 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environ. Change 16 (3), 293- 303.

[28] Gibson, H. , Canfield, J. , 2016. Pocket parks as community building blocks: a focus on Stapleton, CO. Community Dev. 47 (5), 732- 745.

[29] Jasmani, Z. , 2013. Small urban parks and resilience theory: how to link human patterns and ecological functions for urban sustainability. For Urban Ecology as Science, Culture and Power Course 1-11.

[30] Kahn, A.E. , 1966. The tyranny of small decisions: market failures, imperfections, and the limits of economics. Kyklos 19, 23- 47.

[31] Khodayari, N. , Hami, A. , Farrokhi, N. , 2021. The effect of trees with irregular canopy on windbreak function in urban areas. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning 31 (3), 1- 12.

[32] Kim, G. , 2016. The public value of urban vacant land: social responses and ecological value. Sustainability 8 (5).

[33] Krajter Ostoić S. , Marin A.M. , Kičić M., , Vuletić D., , 2020. Qualitative exploration of perception and use of cultural ecosystem services from tree-based urban green space in the city of zagreb(Croatia). Forests 11 (8), 876.

[34] Kremer, P. , Hamstead, Z.A. , McPhearson, T. , 2013. A social-cological assessment of vacant lots in New York City. Landsc. Urban Plann. 120, 218- 233.

[35] Kremer, Peleg , Hamstead, Z.A. , Mcphearson, T. , 2013. A social-ecological assessment of vacant lots in New York city. Landscape And Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V. 120, 218- 233.

[36] Lewis, J. , 2005. The potential fate of leftover green space areas in loughborough-garendon. Arboric. J. 29 (1), 43- 54.

[37] Lin, Y. , 2012. Identifying Perceptions of the Creative Class Regarding Lost Space in downtown Dallas. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington.

[38] Ling, C. , Handley, J. , Rodwell, J. , 2007. Restructuring the postindustrial landscape: a multifunctional approach. Landsc. Res. 32 (3), 285- 309.

[39] Liu, Z. , Xiu, C. , Song, W. , 2019. Landscape-based assessment of urban resilience and its evolution: a case study of the central city of shenyang. Sustainability 11 (10), 2964.

[40] Loukaitou-sideris, A. , 1996. Cracks in the city: addressing the constraints and potentials of urban design. J. Urban Des. 1 (1), 37- 41.

[41] Lynch, K. , 1977. The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[42] Ma, B. , Hauer, R.J. , Xu, C. , Li, W. , 2021. Visualizing evaluation model of human perceptions and characteristic indicators of landscape visual quality in urban green spaces by using nomograms. Urban For. Urban Green. 65 (2021), 127314.

[43] Maharani, A.,M. , Evawani, E. , 2019. Utilization of residual space on ciliwung Riverbank012072.

[44] Marcus, L. , Colding, J. , 2011. Towards a spatial morphology of urban social-ecological systems. In: 18th International Seminar on Urban Form.

[45] Marcus, L. , Colding, J. , 2014. Toward an integrated theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems. Ecol. Soc. 19 (4), 55.

[46] Mariani, M. , Barron, P. , 2013. Terrain Vague Interstices at the Edge of the Pale. Routledge.

[47] Mehaffy, M. , Porta, S. , Rofè Y. , Salingaros, N. , 2010. Urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: the 'emergent neighborhoods' model. Urban Des. Int. 15, 22- 46.

[48] Memarian, A. , Niazkar, N. , 2014. The lost space of architecture in the context of urban lost space. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 3 (5), 311- 321.

[49] Montgomery, J. , 1998. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. J. Urban Des. 3, 93- 116.

[50] Naghibi, M. , Faizi, M. , Ekhlassi, A. , 2020. Undefined lands: a review of their role as an underexplored resource of landscape. Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Landscape Architecture and Art 16 (16), 60- 69.

[51] Naghibi, M. , Faizi, M. , Ekhlassi, A. , 2021. Design possibilities of leftover spaces as a pocket park in relation to planting enclosure . Urban For. Urban Green. 64.

[52] Nassauer, J.I. , Webster, N.J. , Sampson, N. , Li, J. , 2021. Care and safety in neighborhood preferences for vacant lot greenspace in legacy cities. Landsc. Urban Plann. 214.

[53] Nemeth, J. , Langhorst, J. , 2014. Rethinking urban transformation: temporary uses for vacant land. Cities 40(B, SI), 143- 150.

[54] Newman, G. , Dongying, L. , Rui, Z. , Dingding, R. , 2019. Resilience through Regeneration: the economics of repurposing vacant land with green infrastructure. Landsc Archit Front 6 (6), 10- 23.

[55] Nordh, H. , Østby, K. , 2013. Pocket parks for people-a study of park design and use. Urban For. Urban Green. 12 (1), 12- 17.

[56] Noh, Y. , Newman, G. , Lee, R.J. , 2021. Urban decline and residential preference: The effect of vacant lots on housing premiums. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 48 (6), 1667- 1683.

[57] Nordh, H. , Alalouch, C. , Hartig, T. , 2011. Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban For. Urban Green. 10 (2), 95- 103.

[58] Norouzian-Maleki, S. , Bell, S. , Hosseini, S.-B. , Faizi, M. , Saleh-Sedghpour, B. , 2018. A comparison of neighbourhood liveability as perceived by two groups of residents: Tehran, Iran and Tartu, Estonia. Urban For. Urban Green. 35, 8- 20.

[59] Novotny, V. , Ahern, J. , Brown, P. , 2010. Water Centric Sustainable Communities: Planning, Retrofitting and Building the Next Urban Environment. John Wiley and Sons.

[60] Özkan, D.G. , Yilmaz, S. , 2019. The effects of physical and social attributes of place on place attachment: a case study on Trabzon urban squares. Archnet-IJAR 13 (1), 133- 150.

[61] Pasban Hazrat, G. , 2009. Design in Nature: Ferdosi Garden-Jamshidieh Garden-Environmental Design ofKolackchal Valleys. Ganje Honar Press, Tehran, Iran.

[62] Permato, E. , 2014. Connecting community: capturing and patterning orphan space.

[63] Petrova, M. , Nenko, A. , Sukharev, K. , 2016. Urban acupuncture 2.0: Urban management tool inspired by social media. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, pp. 248-257.

[64] Pirlone, F. , Spadaro, I. , Candia, S. , 2020. More resilient cities to face higher risks. The Case of Genoa. Sustainability 12 (12), 4825.

[65] Pizzo, B. , 2015. Problematizing resilience: implications for planning theory and practice. Cities 43, 133- 140.

[66] Qamaruz-Zaman, N. , Samadi, Z. , Azhari, N.F.N. , 2012. Opportunity in leftover spaces: activities under the flyovers of Kuala Lumpur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 68, 451- 463.

[67] Rashid, M. , Ara, D.R. , 2015. Designed Outdoor Spaces and Greenery in a Brownfield Inner City Area: A Case Study from Sydney. Landscape Research 40 (7), 795- 816.

[68] Rezaei, J. , 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49- 57.

[69] Salat, S. , Bourdic, L. , 2012. Urban complexity, efficiency and resilience. In: Energy EfficiencydA Bridge to Low Carbon Economy. Intech Open Access Publisher, pp. 25-44.

[70] Salat, S. , Bourdic, L. , 2014. Spatial planning principles & assessment framework for climate adaptive & resilient cities in China. In: NDRC/MOHURD/aDb International Workshop on Urban Adaptation to Climate Change. Beijing, China.

[71] Schirpke, U. , Tappeiner, G. , Tasser, E. , Tappeiner, U. , 2019. Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences. Ecol. Indicat. 96, 202- 212.

[72] Schlüter, M. , Haider, L.J. , Lade, S.J. , Lindkvist, E. , Martin, R. , et al., 2019. Capturing emergent phenomena in socialecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 24 (3), 11.

[73] Shahhosseini, H. , Kamal Bin Ms, M. , Bin Maulan, S. , 2015. Visual preferences of small urban parks based on spatial configuration of place. Iran University of Science & Technology 25 (2), 84- 93.

[74] Song, X. , Wen, M. , Shen, Y. , Feng, Q. , Xiang, J. , Zhang, W. , Zhao, G. , Wu, Z. , 2020. Urban vacant land in growing urbanization: an international review. J. Geogr. Sci. 30 (4), 669- 687.

[75] Suhardi, M. , 2002. Seremban Urban Park, Malaysia: A Preference Study. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blackburg, VA.

[76] Tarbatt, J. , 2012. The plot: designing diversity in the built environment: a manual for architects and urban designers. RIBA Publishing, London.

[77] Trancik, R. , 1986. Finding Lost Space. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

[78] Tutor, P.S. , Arch, J.R. , 2015. Resilient landscape, resilient culture, the role of geographical place-based perspective in sustainable adaptation of urban areas to the climate.

[79] Unt, A.L. , Bell, S. , 2014. The impact of small-scale design interventions on the behaviour patterns of the users of an urban wasteland. Urban For. Urban Green. 13 (1), 121- 135.

[80] Veitch, J. , Salmon, J. , Ball, K. , Crawford, D. , Timperio, A. , 2013. Do features of public open spaces vary between urban and rural areas? Prev. Med. 56 (2), 107- 111.

[81] Veitch, J. , Salmon, J. , Deforche, B. , Ghekiere, A. , Van Cauwenberg, J. , Bangay, S. , Timperio, A. , 2017. Park attributes that encourage park visitation among adolescents: a conjoint analysis. Landsc. Urban Plann. 161, 52- 58.

[82] Walker, B. , Salt, D. , 2006. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people. In: A Changing World. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

[83] Walz, U. , 2011. Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity imprint/terms of use. Landscape 5 (3), 5.

[84] Xie, Q. , Lee, C. , Lu, Z. , Yuan, X. , 2021. Landscape and Urban Planning Interactions with artificial water features: a scoping review of health-related outcomes. Landsc. Urban Plann. 215, 104191.

[85] Zhang, L. , Tan, P.Y. , Richards, D. , 2021. Relative importance of quantitative and qualitative aspects of urban green spaces in promoting health. Landsc. Urban Plann. 213, 104131.

[86] Zhang, X. , Ni, Z. , Wang, Y. , Chen, S. , Xia, B. , 2020. Public perception and preferences of small urban green infrastructures: a case study in Guangzhou, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 53, 126700.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Higher Education Press and KeAi.