Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox

Salomé A. Bentinck , Clarine J. van Oel , Machiel J. van Dorst

Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2020, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 579 -587.

PDF (1287KB)
Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2020, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) :579 -587. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2020.03.004
Research Article
Research Article

Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox

Author information +
History +
PDF (1287KB)

Abstract

Informal face-to-face communication and chance encounters encourage knowledge sharing. This Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) examines how well a new building of a Dutch University Institute (DI) supported interaction and perceived privacy among faculty members. The study is designed as a qualitative research project with in-depth interviews among faculty members before and after relocation into the new building. The transparent and centrally organized floor plan supported face-to-face communication but generated a lack of privacy for faculty members. Not all perceived affordances of the design were planned. Lack of visual privacy and the sense of being controlled by others were related to the hierarchical position of teachers in this Higher Education Institute (HEI) between students and the dean, which caused tension and diminished their well-being.

Keywords

Affordance / Architectural design / Knowledge sharing / Privacy / Post-occupancy evaluation (POE)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Salomé A. Bentinck, Clarine J. van Oel, Machiel J. van Dorst. Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 579-587 DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2020.03.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press Limited Company. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PDF (1287KB)

1313

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/