RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sum of squares methods for minimizing polynomial forms over spheres and hypersurfaces

  • Jiawang NIE
Expand
  • Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

Received date: 09 Jan 2011

Accepted date: 06 Sep 2011

Published date: 01 Apr 2012

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of minimizing a homogeneous polynomial (form) f(x) over the unit sphere Sn-1={xn:x2=|1}. The problem is NP-hard when f(x) has degree 3 or higher. Denote by fmin (resp. fmax) the minimum (resp. maximum) value of f(x) on Sn-1. First, when f(x) is an even form of degree 2d, we study the standard sum of squares (SOS) relaxation for finding a lower bound of the minimum fmin:

max γ s.t. f(x)-γ·x22d is SOS.
Let fsos be the above optimal value. Then we show that for all n≥2d,
1fmax-fsosfmax-fminC(d)(n2d).
Here, the constant C(d) is independent of n. Second, when f(x) is a multi-form and Sn-1 becomes a multi-unit sphere, we generalize the above SOS relaxation and prove a similar bound. Third, when f(x) is sparse, we prove an improved bound depending on its sparsity pattern; when f(x) is odd, we formulate the problem equivalently as minimizing a certain even form, and prove a similar bound. Last, for minimizing f(x) over a hypersurface H(g)={xn:g(x)=1} defined by a positive definite form g(x), we generalize the above SOS relaxation and prove a similar bound.

Cite this article

Jiawang NIE . Sum of squares methods for minimizing polynomial forms over spheres and hypersurfaces[J]. Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 2012 , 7(2) : 321 -346 . DOI: 10.1007/s11464-012-0187-4

1
Blekherman G. There are significantly more nonnegative polynomials than sums of squares. Israel J Math, 2006, 153: 355–380

DOI

2
Faybusovich L. Global optimization of homogeneous polynomials on the simplex and on the sphere. In: Floudas C, Pardalos P, eds. Frontiers in Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optim Appl, Vol 74. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, 109–121

DOI

3
Hurwitz A. Über den Vergleich des arithmetischen und des geometrischen. Mittels J Reine Angew Math, 1891, 108: 266–268

DOI

4
Kojima M, Kim S, Waki H. Sparsity in sums of squares of polynomials. Math Program, 2005, 103(1): 45–62

DOI

5
Lasserre J. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J Optim, 2001, 11(3): 796–817

DOI

6
Ling C, Nie J, Qi L, Ye Y. Bi-quadratic optimization over unit spheres and semidefinite programming relaxations. SIAM J Optim, 2009, 20(3): 1286–1310

DOI

7
Nesterov Y. Random walk in a simplex and quadratic optimization over convex polytopes. CORE Discussion Paper, CORE, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvainla-Neuve, Belgium, 2003

8
Nie J, Demmel J. Sparse SOS relaxations for minimizing functions that are summations of small polynomials. SIAM J Optim, 2008, 19(4): 1534–1558 346 Jiawang NIE

DOI

9
Parrilo P. Semidefinite Programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems. Math Program, Ser B, 2003, 96(2): 293–320

10
Parrilo P. Exploiting structure in sum of squares programs. In: Proceedings for the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, 2003. 2004, 4664–4669

11
Parrilo P, Sturmfels B. Minimizing polynomial functions. In: Basu S, Gonzalez-Vega L, eds. Proceedings of the DIMACS Workshop on Algorithmic and Quantitative Aspects of Real Algebraic Geometry in Mathematics and Computer Science (March 2001). Providence: Amer Math Soc, 2003, 83–100

12
Reznick B. Forms derived from the arithmetic-geometric inequality. Math Ann, 1989, 283: 431–464

DOI

13
Reznick B. Some concrete aspects of Hilbert’s 17th problem. In: Contem Math, Vol 253. Providence: Amer Math Soc, 2000, 251–272

14
Wolkowicz H, Saigal R, Vandenberghe L, eds. Handbook of Semidefinite Programming: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 27. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000

Options
Outlines

/