Theta-lifting and geometric quantization for GL(n, ?)

Abstract

In this paper, we verify Vogan’s conjecture on quantization in the representation theory for G = GL(n, ℂ). Also we get some relationship between the induction of orbits and Howe’s θ-lifting of unitary representations.

Keywords

Vogan’s conjecture on quantization / induced orbits / unitary representations / theta-lifting

References

[1] Adams J, Barbasch D. Reductive dual pair correspondence for complex groups. J Funct Anal, 1995, 132: 1-42

[2] Adams J, Huang J S, Vogan D. Functions on the model orbits in E₈. Represent Theory, 1998, 2: 224-263

[3] Collingwood D, McGovern W. Nilpotent Orbits in Semisimple Lie Algebras. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993

[4] Howe R. θ-series and invariant theory. Proc Sympos Pure Math, 1979, 33(1): 275-285

[5] Howe R. Transcending classical invariant theory. J Amer Math Soc, 1989, 2: 535-552

[6] Kostant B. Quantization and unitary representations. In: Taam C, ed. Lectures in Modern Analysis and Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol 170. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1970, 87-207

[7] Lusztig G, Spaltenstein N. Induced unipotent classes. J Lond Math Soc, 1979, 19: 41-52

[8] Namikawa Y. Induced nilpotent orbits and birational geometry. Adv Math, 2009, 222: 547-564

[9] Torasso P. Quantification géométrique, opérateurs d’entrelacement et représentations unitarires de SL~3(ℝ). Acta Math, 1983, 150: 153-242

[10] Vogan D. Unitary Representations of Reductive Lie Groups. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987

[11] Vogan D. Associated varieties and unipotent representations. In: Barker W, Sally P, eds. Harmonic Analysis on Reductive Groups. Boston-Basel-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 1991, 315-388

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg