THE HEDGEHOG DILEMMA IN THE COURT-MEDIA RELATIONSHIP IN CHINA

JIANG Huiling

PDF(231 KB)
PDF(231 KB)
Front. Law China ›› 2014, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 174-185. DOI: 10.3868/s050-003-014-0011-7
research-article
research-article

THE HEDGEHOG DILEMMA IN THE COURT-MEDIA RELATIONSHIP IN CHINA

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper explains why Schopenhauer’s “Hedgehog Dilemma” may be the most apposite metaphor for the relationship between the courts and the media. Whatever they get from each other, the media’s role representing the public and the court’s role representing justice are both essential to modern democracy. Therefore, their relationship has attracted attention, not just in legal and media professions, but also in public and government debate. In the last two decades, China’s highest court has issued judicial interpretations and guidelines to regulate the activities of the media and the court, which has brought the topic to a new level of discussion. As a drafter of these official documents, the author will comment on development in this field and their interaction with values inherent to democracy.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
JIANG Huiling. THE HEDGEHOG DILEMMA IN THE COURT-MEDIA RELATIONSHIP IN CHINA. Front. Law China, 2014, 9(2): 174‒185 https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-003-014-0011-7

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters
PDF(231 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/