INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY

Yin Liu

PDF(202 KB)
PDF(202 KB)
Front. Law China ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 314-328. DOI: 10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1
research-article
research-article

INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The EBRD is a “political bank.” “Multiparty democracy, pluralism and market economies” are the conditions (termed as “conditionality”) to get financial resources. The EBRD conditionality is coercive and intrusive. In sense of its nature, it is political rather than economic. Since it is purposed to foster the transition of open market, it is legitimate. In essence, it is believed to be a form of good international co-operation rather than that of willful or arbitrary intervention.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yin Liu. INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY. Front Law Chin, 2012, 7(2): 314‒328 https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters
PDF(202 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/