INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY

Yin Liu

Front. Law China ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 314 -328.

PDF (202KB)
Front. Law China ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 314 -328. DOI: 10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1
research-article
research-article

INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY

Author information +
History +
PDF (202KB)

Abstract

The EBRD is a “political bank.” “Multiparty democracy, pluralism and market economies” are the conditions (termed as “conditionality”) to get financial resources. The EBRD conditionality is coercive and intrusive. In sense of its nature, it is political rather than economic. Since it is purposed to foster the transition of open market, it is legitimate. In essence, it is believed to be a form of good international co-operation rather than that of willful or arbitrary intervention.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yin Liu. INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY. Front. Law China, 2012, 7(2): 314-328 DOI:10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (202KB)

791

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/