From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration

Hongxia LI , Khaja WAHAB AHMED , Mohamed A. ABDELSALAM , Michael FOWLER , Xiao-Yu WU

Front. Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 291 -307.

PDF (7701KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 291 -307. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-024-0917-9
REVIEW ARTICLE

From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration

Author information +
History +
PDF (7701KB)

Abstract

Solar-driven hydrogen production from seawater attracts great interest for its emerging role in decarbonizing global energy consumption. Given the complexity of natural seawater content, photocatalytic vapor splitting offers a low-cost and safe solution, but with a very low solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. With a focus on cutting-edge photothermal–photocatalytic device design and system integration, the recent research advances on vapor splitting from seawater, as well as industrial implementations in the past decades were reviewed. In addition, the design strategies of the key processes were reviewed, including vapor temperature and pressure control during solar thermal vapor generation from seawater, capillary-fed vaporization with salt repellent, and direct photocatalytic vapor splitting for hydrogen production. Moreover, the existing laboratory-scale and industrial-scale systems, and the integration principles and remaining challenges in the future seawater-to-hydrogen technology were discussed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

seawater / hydrogen / photocatalytic / vapor splitting / solar-driven

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongxia LI, Khaja WAHAB AHMED, Mohamed A. ABDELSALAM, Michael FOWLER, Xiao-Yu WU. From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration. Front. Energy, 2024, 18(3): 291-307 DOI:10.1007/s11708-024-0917-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

InternationalEnergy Agency. Global hydrogen review 2021. 2023–10–6, available at website of IEA

[2]

HausmannJ N, Schlögl R, MenezesP W, et al. Is direct seawater splitting economically meaningful? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(7): 3679–3685 10.1039/D0EE03659E

[3]

Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z. . Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nature Energy, 2023, 8: 264–272

[4]

KhanM A, Al-Attas T, RoyS, et al. Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: a solution looking for a problem? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(9): 4831–4839 10.1039/D1EE00870F

[5]

Kronawitter C X, Vayssieres L, Shen S. . A perspective on solar-driven water splitting with all-oxide hetero-nanostructures. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(10): 3889–3899

[6]

XuSYuB. Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(6): 1-12 (in Chinese)

[7]

Davenport D M, Deshmukh A, Werber J R. . High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: Current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2018, 5(8): 467–475

[8]

Fujiwara M, Kikuchi M. Solar desalination of seawater using double-dye-modified PTFE membrane. Water Research, 2017, 127: 96–103

[9]

Shaheen A, AlBadi S, Zhuman B. . Photothermal air gap membrane distillation for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431(1): 133909

[10]

Lee A, Elam J W, Darling S B. Membrane materials for water purification: Design, development, and application. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2016, 2(1): 17–42

[11]

Stoll T, Zafeiropoulos G, Tsampas M N. Solar fuel production in a novel polymeric electrolyte membrane photoelectrochemical (PEM-PEC) cell with a web of titania nanotube arrays as photoanode and gaseous reactants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(40): 17807–17817

[12]

Döscher H, Geisz J F, Deutsch T G. . Sunlight absorption in water-efficiency and design implications for photoelectrochemical devices. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(9): 2951–2956

[13]

Gopinath C S, Nalajala N. A scalable and thin film approach for solar hydrogen generation: A review on enhanced photocatalytic water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A.Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(3): 1353–1371

[14]

Guo L, Chen Y, Su J. . Obstacles of solar-powered photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production: A perspective from energy flow and mass flow. Energy, 2019, 172: 1079–1086

[15]

Zhang J, Hu W, Cao S. . Recent progress for hydrogen production by photocatalytic natural or simulated seawater splitting. Nano Research, 2020, 13(9): 2313–2322

[16]

Pang X, Das S, Davis J T. . Membraneless electrolyzers for low-cost hydrogen production. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2020, MA2020(1): 1587

[17]

Yao Y, Gao X, Meng X. Recent advances on electrocatalytic and photocatalytic seawater splitting for hydrogen evolution. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(13): 9087–9100

[18]

Alketbi A S, Raza A, Sajjad M. . Direct solar vapor generation with micro-3D printed hydrogel device. EcoMat, 2022, 4(1): 12157

[19]

Tao F, Green M, Garcia A V. . Recent progress of nanostructured interfacial solar vapor generators. Applied Materials Today, 2019, 17: 45–84

[20]

Zhou L, Li X, Ni G W. . The revival of thermal utilization from the Sun: Interfacial solar vapor generation. National Science Review, 2019, 6(3): 562–578

[21]

Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Recent progress in solar-driven interfacial water evaporation: Advanced designs and applications. Nano Energy, 2019, 57: 507–518

[22]

He H, Song Z, Lan Y. . Photocorrosion-based BiOCl photothermal materials for synergistic solar-driven desalination and photoelectrochemistry energy storage and release. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(14): 17947–17956

[23]

Goto Y, Hisatomi T, Wang Q. . A particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen generation. Joule, 2018, 2(3): 509–520

[24]

Hisatomi T, Maeda K, Takanabe K. . Aspects of the water splitting mechanism on (Ga1–xZnx)(N1–xOx) photocatalyst modified with Rh2–yCryO3 cocatalyst. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(51): 21458–21466

[25]

Nishioka S, Osterloh F E, Wang X. . Photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2023, 31(3): 1–15

[26]

Herrmann J M. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catalysis Today, 1999, 53(1): 115–129

[27]

Gao M, Peh C K, Zhu L. . Photothermal catalytic gel featuring spectral and thermal management for parallel freshwater and hydrogen production. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(23): 2000925

[28]

Shearer C J, Hisatomi T, Domen K. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting of moisture in ambient air: Toward reagent-free hydrogen production. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2020, 401(1): 112757

[29]

Suguro T, Kishimoto F, Kariya N. . A hygroscopic nano-membrane coating achieves efficient vapor-fed photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 5698

[30]

Spurgeon J M, Lewis N S. Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2993

[31]

Li Z, Tian B, Zhen W. . Inhibition of hydrogen and oxygen recombination using oxygen transfer reagent hemin chloride in Pt/TiO2 dispersion for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 203: 408–415

[32]

Dionigi F, Vesborg P C K, Pedersen T. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting with Rh2yCryO3/GaN:ZnO in μ-reactors. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2937–2942

[33]

Guo S, Li X, Li J. . Boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production from water by photothermally induced biphase systems. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1343

[34]

Cheng P, Quan X, Gong S. . Recent analytical and numerical studies on phase-change heat transfer. Advances in Heat Transfer, 2014, 46: 187–248

[35]

Zhang H L, Baeyens J, Degrève J. . Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 466–481

[36]

Zhao L, Bhatia B, Zhang L. . A passive high-temperature high-pressure solar steam generator for medical sterilization. Joule, 2020, 4(12): 2733–2745

[37]

Neumann O, Urban A, Day J. . Solar vapor generation enabled by nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 2013, 7, (1): 42–49

[38]

Zavoico A B. Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0. Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report SAND2001-2100. 2001

[39]

Abbas R, Montes M J, Piera M. . Solar radiation concentration features in Linear Fresnel Reflector arrays. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 54(1): 133–144

[40]

Ni G, Li G, Boriskina S V. . Steam generation under one sun enabled by a floating structure with thermal concentration. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(9): 16126

[41]

Ito Y, Tanabe Y, Han J. . Multifunctional porous graphene for high-efficiency steam generation by heat localization. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(29): 4302–4307

[42]

H . Ghasemi H, Ni G, Marconnet A M, et al. Solar steam generation by heat localization. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 449

[43]

Fang J, Liu J, Gu J. . Hierarchical porous carbonized lotus seedpods for highly efficient solar steam generation. Chemistry of Materials, 2018, 30(18): 6217–6221

[44]

Raza A, Lu J, Alzaim S. . Novel receiver-enhanced solar vapor generation: Review and perspectives. Energies, 2018, 11(1): 253

[45]

Li X, Li J, Lu J. . Enhancement of interfacial solar vapor generation by environmental energy. Joule, 2018, 2(7): 1331–1338

[46]

Jia C, Li Y, Yang Z. . Rich mesostructures derived from natural woods for solar steam generation. Joule, 2017, 1(3): 588–599

[47]

He S, Chen C, Kuang Y. . Nature-inspired salt resistant bimodal porous solar evaporator for efficient and stable water desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(5): 1558–1567

[48]

Li W, Li F, Zhang D. . Porous wood-carbonized solar steam evaporator. Wood Science and Technology, 2021, 55(3): 625–637

[49]

Liang J, Ji X, Han J. . Modeling and experimental investigation on a direct steam generation solar collector with flat plate thermal concentration. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2020, 38(5): 1879–1892

[50]

Neumann O, Feronti C, Neumann A D. . Compact solar autoclave based on steam generation using broadband light-harvesting nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(29): 11677–11681

[51]

Li J, Du M, Lv G. . Interfacial solar steam generation enables fast-responsive, energy-efficient, and low-cost off-grid sterilization. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(49): 1805159

[52]

Alhosani M H, Li H, Alketbi A S. . Enhanced liquid propagation and wicking along nanostructured porous surfaces. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2021, 23(7): 2100118

[53]

Vaartstra G, Zhang L, Lu Z. . Capillary-fed, thin film evaporation devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 2020, 128(13): 130901

[54]

Abdelsalam M A. Bio-inspired solar thermal brine treatment with direct vapor generation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Abu Dhabi: Khalifa University, 2023

[55]

Xu K, Wang C, Li Z. . Salt mitigation strategies of solar-driven interfacial desalination. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 31(8): 2007855

[56]

Xia Y, Kang Y, Wang Z. . Rational designs of interfacial-heating solar-thermal desalination devices: Recent progress and remaining challenges. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(11): 6612–6633

[57]

Zhang L, Li X, Zhong Y. . Highly efficient and salt rejecting solar evaporation via a wick-free confined water layer. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 849

[58]

Ni G, Zandavi S H, Javid S M. . A salt-rejecting floating solar still for low-cost desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(6): 1510–1519

[59]

Shalaby S M, Sharshir S W, Kabeel A E. . Reverse osmosis desalination systems powered by solar energy: Preheating techniques and brine disposal challenges—A detailed review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 251: 114971

[60]

Gebreslase G A. Review on membranes for the filtration of aqueous based solution: Oil in water emulsion. Journal of Membrane Science & Technology, 2018, 8(2): 1000188

[61]

Deshmukh A, Boo C, Karanikola V. . Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: Limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1177–1196

[62]

Wang Y, Lee J, Werber J R. . Capillary-driven desalination in a synthetic mangrove. Science Advances, 2020, 6(8): eaax5253

[63]

Yang Y, Zhao H, Yin Z. . A general salt-resistant hydrophilic/hydrophobic nanoporous double layer design for efficient and stable solar water evaporation distillation. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(6): 1143–1150

[64]

Xu W, Hu X, Zhuang S. . Flexible and salt resistant Janus absorbers by electrospinning for stable and efficient solar desalination. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(14): 1702884

[65]

Hu R, Zhang J, Kuang Y. . A Janus evaporator with low tortuosity for long-term solar desalination. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2019, 7(25): 15333–15340

[66]

Gao S, Dong X, Huang J. . Bioinspired soot-deposited Janus fabrics for sustainable solar steam generation with salt-rejection. Global Challenges, 2019, 3(8): 1800117

[67]

Liu G, Chen T, Xu J. . Salt-rejecting solar interfacial evaporation. Cell Reports. Physical Science, 2021, 2(1): 100310

[68]

Cooper T A, Zandavi S H, Ni G W. . Contactless steam generation and superheating under one sun illumination. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 5086

[69]

Menon A K, Haechler I, Kaur S. . Enhanced solar evaporation using a photo-thermal umbrella for wastewater management. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(2): 144–151

[70]

Domen K, Naito S, Soma M. . Photocatalytic decomposition of water vapour on an NiO–SrTiO3 catalyst. Journal of the Chemical Society. Chemical Communications, 1980, (12): 543–544

[71]

Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38

[72]

Chen X, Shen S, Guo L. . Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11): 6503–6570

[73]

WahabA K, Idriss H. Study of the photocatalytic reforming and oxidation of Glycerol over Ag–Pd/TiO2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52(Part B), 159−171.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.344

[74]

Wahab A K, Nadeem M A, Idriss H. Hydrogen production during ethylene glycol photoreactions over Ag-Pd/TiO2 at different partial pressures of oxygen. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2019, 7: 476835

[75]

Zhang W, Banerjee-Ghosh K, Tassinari F. . Enhanced electrochemical water splitting with chiral molecule-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(10): 2308–2313

[76]

Leduc J, Goenuellue Y, Ghamgosar P. . Electronically-coupled phase boundaries in α-Fe2O3/Fe3O4 nanocomposite photoanodes for enhanced water oxidation. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2019, 2(1): 334–342

[77]

Amano F, Ishinaga E, Yamakata A. Effect of particle size on the photocatalytic activity of WO3 particles for water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(44): 22584–22590

[78]

Wang F, DiValentin C, Pacchioni G. Rational band gap engineering of WO3 photocatalyst for visible light water splitting. ChemCatChem, 2012, 4(4): 476–478

[79]

Hamid S B A, Teh S J, Lai C W. Photocatalytic water oxidation on ZnO: A review. Catalysts, 2017, 7(3): 93

[80]

Ni M, Leung M K H, Leung D Y C. . A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007, 11(3): 401–425

[81]

Hong Y, Fang Z, Yin B. . A visible-light-driven heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic water splitting over Ta2O5 modified g-C3N4 photocatalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(10): 6738–6745

[82]

Marschall R. Semiconductor composites: Strategies for enhancing charge carrier separation to improve photocatalytic activity. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24(17): 2421–2440

[83]

Qian R, Zong H, Schneider J. . Charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during TiO2 photocatalysis: An overview. Catalysis Today, 2019, 335: 78–90

[84]

Fu C F, Wu X, Yang J. Material design for photocatalytic water splitting from a theoretical perspective. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(48): 1802106

[85]

Dingenen F, Verbruggen S W. Tapping hydrogen fuel from the ocean: A review on photocatalytic, photoelectrochemical and electrolytic splitting of seawater. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 142: 110866

[86]

Zhu C C, Jiang T, Yang H C. . ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles with iron-rich surfaces for enhanced photocatalytic water vapor splitting. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 636: 157842

[87]

Daeneke T, Dahr N, Atkin P. . Surface water dependent properties of sulfur-rich molybdenum sulfides: Electrolyteless gas phase water splitting. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7): 6782–6794

[88]

Chowdhury F A, Trudeau M L, Guo H. . A photochemical diode artificial photosynthesis system for unassisted high efficiency overall pure water splitting. Nature Communication, 2018, 9: 1707

[89]

Wang Q, Hisatomi T, Jia Q. . Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1%. Nature Materials, 2016, 15: 611–615

[90]

Maeda K, Teramura K, Lu D. . Noble-metal/Cr2O3 core/shell nanoparticles as a cocatalyst for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006, 45(46): 7806–7809

[91]

Ng K H, Lai S Y, Cheng C K. . Photocatalytic water splitting for solving energy crisis: Myth, fact or busted?. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 417: 128847

[92]

Nishiyama H, Yamada T, Nakabayashi M. . Photocatalytic solar hydrogen production from water on a 100-m2 scale. Nature, 2021, 598(7880): 304–307

[93]

Jin Z, Yan X, Hao X. Rational design of a novel p-n heterojunction based on 3D layered nanoflower MoSx supported CoWO4 nanoparticles for superior photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 569: 34–49

[94]

Bhattacharya R N, Lee C Y, Pollak F H. . Optical study of amorphous MoS3: Determination of the fundamental energy gap. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1987, 91(2): 235–242

[95]

Tang M L, Grauer D C, Lassalle-Kaiser B. . Structural and electronic study of an amorphous MoS3 hydrogen-generation catalyst on a quantum-controlled photosensitizer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50(43): 10203–10207

[96]

Zhang S, Zhao H, Li X. . A hierarchical SiPN/CN/MoSx photocathode with low internal resistance and strong light-absorption for solar hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 300: 120758

[97]

Shin S, Jin Z, Kwon D H. . High turnover frequency of hydrogen evolution reaction on amorphous MoS2 thin film directly grown by atomic layer deposition. Langmuir, 2015, 31(3): 1196–1202

[98]

Benck J D, Chen Z, Kuritzky L Y. . Amorphous molybdenum sulfide catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production: Insights into the origin of their catalytic activity. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(9): 1916–1923

[99]

Bourgeteau T, Tondelier D, Geffroy B. . A H2-evolving photocathode based on direct sensitization of MoS3 with an organic photovoltaic cell. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(9): 2706

[100]

Zhou P, Navid I A, Ma Y. . Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of more than 9% in photocatalytic water splitting. Nature, 2023, 613(7942): 66–70

[101]

Schrauzer G N, Guth T D. Photolysis of water and photoreduction of nitrogen on titanium dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1977, 99(22): 7189–7193

[102]

Domen K, Naito S, Onishi T. . Study of the photocatalytic decomposition of water vapor over a nickel(II) oxide-strontium titanate (SrTiO3) catalyst. ChemInform, 1982, 86(18): 3657–3661

[103]

Lee W H, Lee C W, Cha G D. . Floatable photocatalytic hydrogel nanocomposites for large-scale solar hydrogen production. Nature Nanotechnology, 2023, 18(7): 754–762

[104]

Han H, Huang K, Yao Y. . Enhanced photocatalytic splitting of photothermally induced water vapor to evolve hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138419

[105]

Gao M, Connor P K N, Ho G W. Plasmonic photothermic directed broadband sunlight harnessing for seawater catalysis and desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(10): 3151–3160

[106]

Sansom C, Patchigolla K, Jonnalagadda K. . Design of a novel CSP/MED desalination system. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Freiburg. New York: AIP Publishing, 2022, 2445(1): 140012

[107]

Chen S, Zhao P, Xie G. . A floating solar still inspired by continuous root water intake. Desalination, 2021, 512: 115133

[108]

NEOM. NEOM adopts pioneering solar dome technology for sustainable desalination project 2020. 2023-10-6, available at website of NEOM

[109]

Zheng Y, Ma M, Shao H. Recent advances in efficient and scalable solar hydrogen production through water splitting. Carbon Neutrality, 2023, 2(1): 23

[110]

Schreck M, Niederberger M. Photocatalytic gas phase reactions. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(3): 597–618

[111]

Jenny S, Matsuoka M, Takeuchi M. . Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(19): 9919–9986

[112]

Patial S, Hasija V, Raizada P. . Tunable photocatalytic activity of SrTiO3 for water splitting: Strategies and future scenario. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(3): 103791

[113]

Acar C, Dincer I, Naterer G F. Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(11): 1449–1473

[114]

Mikaeili F, Gilmore T, Gouma P I. Photochemical water splitting via transition metal oxides. Catalysts, 2022, 12(11): 1303

[115]

Yang M Q, Gao M, Hong M. . Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: Progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(47): 1802894

[116]

Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Solar-driven photothermal nanostructured materials designs and prerequisites for evaporation and catalysis applications. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(3): 323–343

[117]

Tu Y, Zhou J, Lin S, et al. Photomolecular effect leading to water evaporation exceeding thermal limit. 2022, arXiv: 2201. 10385 2022

[118]

Tu Y, Chen G. Photomolecular effect: Visible light absorption at water-vapor interface. 2022, arXiv:2202.10646 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10646

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (7701KB)

3150

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/