Deep learning-based structural characterization and mass transport analysis of CO2 reduction catalyst layers

Tianzi Bi , Yuan Liu , Yuxuan Wei , Rongyi Wang , Runxi Yuan , Guiru Zhang , Huiyuan Li , Xiaojing Cheng , Shuiyun Shen , Junliang Zhang

Front. Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 681 -693.

PDF (5643KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 681 -693. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-025-1029-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Deep learning-based structural characterization and mass transport analysis of CO2 reduction catalyst layers

Author information +
History +
PDF (5643KB)

Abstract

Electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) is a promising technology for mitigating global climate change. The catalyst layer (CL), where the reduction reaction occurs, plays a pivotal role in determining mass transport and electrochemical performance. However, accurately characterizing local structures and quantifying mass transport remains a significant challenge. To address these limitations, a systematic characterization framework based on deep learning (DL) is proposed. Five semantic segmentation models, including Segformer and DeepLabV3plus, were compared with conventional image processing techniques, among which DeepLabV3plus achieved the highest segmentation accuracy (> 91.29%), significantly outperforming traditional thresholding methods (72.35%–77.42%). Experimental validation via mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) confirmed its capability to precisely extract key structural parameters, such as porosity and pore size distribution. Furthermore, a series of ionomer content gradient experiments revealed that a CL with an ionomer/catalyst (I/C) ratio of 0.2 had the optimal pore network structure. Numerical simulations and electrochemical tests demonstrated that this CL enabled a twofold increase in gas diffusion distance, thereby promoting long-range mass transport and significantly enhancing CO production rates. This work establishes a multi-scale analysis framework integrating “structural characterization, mass transport simulation, and performance validation,” offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for the rational design of CO2RR CLs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

carbon dioxide reduction / deep learning (DL) / semantic segmentation / catalyst layer (CL) / mass transport

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tianzi Bi, Yuan Liu, Yuxuan Wei, Rongyi Wang, Runxi Yuan, Guiru Zhang, Huiyuan Li, Xiaojing Cheng, Shuiyun Shen, Junliang Zhang. Deep learning-based structural characterization and mass transport analysis of CO2 reduction catalyst layers. Front. Energy, 2025, 19(5): 681-693 DOI:10.1007/s11708-025-1029-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Niu J , Zhang C , Liu H . . Enhanced performance of oxygen vacancies on CO2 adsorption and activation over different phases of ZrO2. Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17(4): 545–554

[2]

Deng T , Jia S , Han S . . Electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+ products over Cu/Zn intermetallic catalysts synthesized by electrodeposition. Frontiers in Energy, 2024, 18(1): 80–88

[3]

Lee W H , Ko Y J , Choi Y . . Highly selective and scalable CO2 to CO electrolysis using coral-nanostructured Ag catalysts in zero-gap configuration. Nano Energy, 2020, 76: 105030

[4]

Rudnev A V , Fu Y C , Gjuroski I . . Transport matters: Boosting CO2 electroreduction in mixtures of [BMIm][BF4]/water by enhanced diffusion. ChemPhysChem, 2017, 18(22): 3153–3162

[5]

Raciti D , Mao M , Park J H . . Mass transfer effects in CO2 reduction on Cu nanowire electrocatalysts. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, 8(9): 2364–2369

[6]

Yang K , Kas R , Smith W A . In situ infrared spectroscopy reveals persistent alkalinity near electrode surfaces during CO2 electroreduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(40): 15891–15900

[7]

Shi R , Guo J , Zhang X . . Efficient wettability-controlled electroreduction of CO2 to CO at Au/C interfaces. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 3028

[8]

Rabiee H , Ge L , Zhang X . . Gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and dinitrogen to value-added products: A review. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(4): 1959–2008

[9]

Nguyen T N , Dinh C T . Gas diffusion electrode design for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(21): 7488–7504

[10]

Wu X , Zhao J Y , Sun J W . . Isolation of highly reactive cobalt phthalocyanine via electrochemical activation for enhanced CO2 reduction reaction. Small, 2023, 19(23): 2207037

[11]

Xiang H . Rasul S. Scott K, et al. Enhanced selectivity of carbonaceous products from electrochemical reduction of CO2 in aqueous media. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2019, 30: 214–221

[12]

Lu S , Wang Y , Xiang H . . Mass transfer effect to electrochemical reduction of CO2: Electrode, electrocatalyst and electrolyte. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 52: 104764

[13]

He Y , Jiang W J , Zhang Y . . Pore-structure-directed CO2 electroreduction to formate on SnO2/C catalysts. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2019, 7(31): 18428–18433

[14]

Goyal A , Bondue C J , Graf M . . Effect of pore diameter and length on electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction at nanoporous gold catalysts. Chemical Science, 2022, 13(11): 3288–3298

[15]

Jia C , Zhao Y , Song S . . Highly ordered hierarchical porous single-atom Fe catalyst with promoted mass transfer for efficient electroreduction of CO2. Advanced Energy Materials, 2023, 13(37): 2302007

[16]

Lees E W , Bui J C , Song D . . Continuum model to define the chemistry and mass transfer in a bicarbonate electrolyzer. ACS Energy Letters, 2022, 7(2): 834–842

[17]

Weng L C , Bell A T , Weber A Z . Modeling gas-diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(25): 16973–16984

[18]

Mukherjee P P , Wang C Y , Kang Q . Mesoscopic modeling of two-phase behavior and flooding phenomena in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(27): 6861–6875

[19]

Chen L , Wu G , Holby E F . . Lattice Boltzmann pore-scale investigation of coupled physical-electrochemical processes in C/Pt and non-precious metal cathode catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 158: 175–186

[20]

Chen M , Zhao C , Sun F . . Research progress of catalyst layer and interlayer interface structures in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. eTransportation, 2020, 5: 100075

[21]

Lang J T , Kulkarni D , Foster C W . . X-Ray tomography applied to electrochemical devices and electrocatalysis. Chemical Reviews, 2023, 123(16): 9880–9914

[22]

Münch B , Gasser P , Holzer L . . FIB-nanotomography of particulate systems—Part II: Particle recognition and effect of boundary truncation. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2006, 89(8): 2586–2595

[23]

Otsu N . A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1): 62–66

[24]

White R T , Ramani D , Eberhardt S . . Correlative X-ray tomographic imaging of catalyst layer degradation in fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(13): F914–F925

[25]

Ariff F N M , Nasir A S A , Jaafar H . . Sauvola and Niblack techniques analysis for segmentation of vehicle license plate. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 864(1): 012136

[26]

Likas A , Vlassis N , Verbeek J . The global K-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognition, 2003, 36(2): 451–461

[27]

Berg P , Novruzi A , Promislow K . Analysis of a cathode catalyst layer model for a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(13): 4316–4331

[28]

Armstrong K W , von Spakovsky M R . A microscopic continuum model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrode catalyst layer. In: ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2006, 11(5-10): 349–358

[29]

Wang W , Qu Z , Wang X . . A molecular model of PEMFC catalyst layer: Simulation on reactant transport and thermal conduction. Membranes, 2021, 11(2): 148

[30]

Wang Y D , Blunt M J , Armstrong R T . . Deep learning in pore scale imaging and modeling. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 215: 103555

[31]

Colliard-Granero A , Batool M , Jankovic J . . Deep learning for the automation of particle analysis in catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nanoscale, 2021, 14(1): 10–18

[32]

Hwang H , Choi S M , Oh J . . Integrated application of semantic segmentation-assisted deep learning to quantitative multi-phased microstructural analysis in composite materials: Case study of cathode composite materials of solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 471: 228458

[33]

Müller S , Sauter C , Shunmugasundaram R . . Deep learning-based segmentation of lithium-ion battery microstructures enhanced by artificially generated electrodes. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 6205

[34]

Young R J . Micro-machining using a focused ion beam. Vacuum, 1993, 44(3-4): 353–356

[35]

Ji G , Tan Z , Shabadi R . . Triple ion beam cutting of diamond/Al composites for interface characterization. Materials Characterization, 2014, 89: 132–137

[36]

Ren H , Meng X , Lin Y . . Structural stability of catalyst ink and its effects on the catalyst layer microstructure and fuel cell performance. Journal of Power Sources, 2022, 517: 230698

[37]

Wang M , Wang J , Pan N . . Three-dimensional effect on the effective thermal conductivity of porous media. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2007, 40(1): 260–265

[38]

Hou Y , Deng H , Pan F . . Pore-scale investigation of catalyst layer ingredient and structure effect in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy, 2019, 253: 113561

[39]

Matar S , Ge J , Liu H . Modeling the cathode catalyst layer of a direct methanol fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 243: 195–202

[40]

Dong F , Hu Z , Wang Z . . Modeling and optimizing anode catalyst layer for direct ammonia fuel cell. Energy Nexus, 2023, 9: 100170

[41]

Kim C , Bui J C , Luo X . . Tailored catalyst microenvironments for CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products on copper using bilayer ionomer coatings. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(11): 1026–1034

[42]

Qu Y , Yang K , Li W . . Operando diagnosis of MEA-type CO2 electrolyzer via distribution of relaxation times analysis. ACS Energy Letters, 2024, 9(6): 3042–3048

[43]

Ren S , Joulié D , Salvatore D . . Molecular electrocatalysts can mediate fast, selective CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Science, 2019, 365(6451): 367–369

[44]

Senocrate A , Bernasconi F , Rentsch D . . Importance of substrate pore size and wetting behavior in gas diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2022, 5(11): 14504–14512

[45]

Goyal A , Bondue C J , Graf M . . Effect of pore diameter and length on electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction at nanoporous gold catalysts. Chemical Science, 2022, 13(11): 3288–3298

[46]

Möller T , Ngo Thanh T , Wang X . . The product selectivity zones in gas diffusion electrodes during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(11): 5995–6006

[47]

Hao S , Zhou Y , Guo Y . A brief survey on semantic segmentation with deep learning. Neurocomputing, 2020, 406: 302–321

[48]

Sun M , Cheng J , Yamauchi M . Gas diffusion enhanced electrode with ultrathin superhydrophobic macropore structure for acidic CO2 electroreduction. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 491

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2025

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5643KB)

Supplementary files

FEP-25057-OF-BT_suppl_1

3950

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/