Life cycle assessment of green ammonia production at a coastal facility in South Africa

Abstract

A just energy transition (JET) to low-carbon fuels, such as green hydrogen, is critical for mitigating climate change. Countries with abundant renewable energy resources are well-positioned to meet the growing global demand for green hydrogen. However, to improve the volumetric energy density and facilitate transport and distribution over long distances, green hydrogen needs to be converted into an energy carrier such as green ammonia. This study conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of green ammonia production, with a particular focus on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The boundary of the study was from cradle-to-production gate, and the design was based on a coastal production facility in South Africa, which uses renewable energy to desalinate seawater, produce hydrogen, and synthesise ammonia. The carbon intensity of production was 0.79 kg CO₂-eq per kg of ammonia. However, if co-products of oxygen, argon and excess electricity are sold to market and allocated a portion of GHG emissions, the carbon intensity was 0.28 kg CO₂-eq per kg of ammonia. Further, without the sale of co-products but excluding the embodied emissions of the energy supply system, as defined in the recent international standard (ISO/TS 19870), the carbon intensity was 0.11 kg CO₂-eq per kg of ammonia. Based on the hydrogen content of ammonia, this is equivalent to 0.60 kg CO₂-eq per kg of hydrogen, which is well below the current threshold for certification as a low-carbon fuel. The process contributing most to the overall environmental impacts was electrolysis (68%), with particulate matter (55%) and global warming potential (33%) as the dominant impact categories. This reflects the energy intensity of electrolysis and the carbon intensity of the energy used to manufacture the infrastructure and capital goods required for green ammonia production. These findings support the adoption of green ammonia as a low-carbon fuel to mitigate climate change and help achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. However, achieving this goal requires the rapid decarbonisation of energy supply systems to reduce embodied emissions from manufacturing infrastructure.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) / just energy transition (JET) / life cycle assessment (LCA) / power-to-X (PtX) / standards and certification

References

[1] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1992

[2] Brown A, Jones B, Smith C. The role of green ammonia in the energy transition: A review. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 123–130

[3] PresidentialClimate Commission. A Framework for a Just Transition in South Africa. 2022

[4] International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. 2021

[5] International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2023. 2023

[6] Jones B, Smith C. Green ammonia: A potential game changer for renewable energy. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(9): 2798–2808

[7] Smith C, Jones B, Brown A. Green ammonia: A sustainable solution for energy storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118531

[8] Milkovits R L, Duić N, Farina R. . Assessment of low carbon ammonia as an energy carrier and possible role in decarbonizing the global energy system. Applied Energy, 2021, 282: 116190

[9] International Energy Agency. Towards Hydrogen Definitions Based on Their Emissions Intensity. 2023

[10] SielerR E, Dörr H. Certification of Green and Low-Carbon Hydrogen: An Overview of International and National Initiatives. Berlin: Adelphi, 2023

[11] Panchenko V A, Daus Y V, Kovalev A A. . Prospects for the production of green hydrogen: Review of countries with high potential. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(12): 4551–4571

[12] H2-Atlas. H2ATLAS-AFRICA Project. 2025

[13] Maka A O M, Mehmood M. Green hydrogen energy production: Current status and potential. Clean Energy, 2024, 8(2): 1–7

[14] DST. Hydrogen Society RoadMap v1. 2021

[15] DTIC. Hydrogen Commercialisation Strategy. 2022

[16] LiuX, Elgowainy A, WangM. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ammonia production from renewable resources and industrial by-products. Argonne National Laboratory, 2020

[17] Boero A J, Kardux K, Kovaleva M. . Environmental life cycle assessment of ammonia-based electricity. Energies, 2021, 14(20): 6721

[18] Bicer Y, Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. . Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 1379–1395

[19] Bicer Y, Dincer I, Vezina G. . Impact assessment and environmental evaluation of various ammonia production processes. Environmental Management, 2017, 59(5): 842–855

[20] de Kleijne K, de Coninck H, van Zelm R. . The many greenhouse gas footprints of green hydrogen. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2022, 6(19): 4383–4387

[21] Zhao G, Kraglund M R, Frandsen H L. . Life cycle assessment of H₂O electrolysis technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(43): 23765–23781

[22] European Commission. Renewable Hydrogen. 2024

[23] International Renewable Energy Agency. Global Trade in Green Hydrogen Derivatives: Trends in Regulation, Standardisation and Certification. 2024

[24] Arrigoni A, Hurtig O, Buffi M. . Life cycle assessments use in hydrogen-related policies: The case for a harmonised methodology addressing multifunctionality. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(32): 12245–12260

[25] InternationalOrganisation for Standardization. Environmental Management‒Life Cycle Assessment‒Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006), and Requirements and Guidelines (ISO 14044). 2006

[26] Huijbregts M A J, Steinmann Z J N, Elshout P M F. . ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22(2): 138–147

[27] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . The 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 2019

[28] PRé Sustainability. Finding Your Way in Multifunctional Processes and Recycling. 2020

[29] Ecoinvent Association. System Models and Database. 2023

[30] Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B. . The Ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(9): 1218–1230

[31] United Nations Environment Programme. Recycling Rates of Metals: A Status Report. 2011

[32] Bureau of International Recycling. World Steel Recycling: Steel Scrap – A Raw Material for Steelmaking. 2020

[33] ReckB. Comprehensive Multilevel Cycles for Nickel. Internal Report for the Nickel Institute. 2015, available at the website of Nikel Institute

[34] International Copper Association. Copper Recycling. 2020

[35] Hauglustaine D A, Paulot F, Collins W J. . Climate benefit of a future hydrogen economy. Communications Earth & Environment, 2022, 3(1): 295

[36] InternationalPartnership for HydrogenFuelCells in the Economy. Methodology for Determining the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Production of Hydrogen (IPHE v3). 2023

[37] InternationalOrganization for Standardization. Environmental Management. Hydrogen Technologies: Methodology for Determining the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Production, Conditioning and Transport of Hydrogen to Consumption Gate (ISO/TS 19870). 2023

[38] REDZ. Renewable energy development zones. 2025-1-1, available at website of Government of South Africa

[39] Roos T H. The cost of production and storage of renewable hydrogen in South Africa and transport to Japan and EU up to 2050 under different scenarios. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(72): 35814–35830

[40] MisoI S O. Midcontinent independent system operator. Discussion of legacy, 765 kV, and HVDC bulk transmission. Ercot EHV and HVDC workshop. 2023-6-26, available at website of ERCOT

[41] PintoJ M. Energy consumption and desalination. 2025-1-1, available at website of University of Houston

[42] Koj J C, Wulf C, Schreiber A. . Site-dependent environmental impacts of industrial hydrogen production by alkaline water electrolysis. Energies, 2017, 10(7): 860

[43] Cheema I, Krewer U. Operating envelope of Haber-Bosch process design for power-to-ammonia. RSC Advances, 2018, 8: 34926–34936

[44] Dai Q, Kelly J C, Gaines L. . Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications. Batteries., 2019, 5(2): 48

[45] DaiQ, KellyJ, DunnJ, et al. Update of Bill-of-Materials and Cathode Materials Production for Lithium-ion Batteries in the GREET Model. Argonne National Laboratory. 2018

[46] Andersson J, Grönkvist S. Large-scale storage of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 11901–11919

[47] Quarton C J, Samsatli S. How to incentivise hydrogen energy technologies for net zero: Whole-system value chain optimisation of policy scenarios. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 27: 1215–1238

[48] DMRE. 2023 South African Energy Price Report. 2023

[49] Kato T, Kubota M, Kobayashi N. . Effective utilization of by-product oxygen from electrolysis hydrogen production. Energy, 2005, 30(14): 2580–2595

[50] Maroukis G, Georgiadis M C. Modelling, simulation, and techno-economic optimisation of argon separation processes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2022, 184: 154–179

[51] Eskom. Fact sheet. 2025

[52] International Renewable Energy Agency. Shaping Sustainable International Hydrogen Value Chains. 2024

[53] Ekvall T. Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1999, 7(4): 281–294

[54] Schrijvers D L, Loubet P, Sonnemann G. Critical review of guidelines against a systematic framework with regard to consistency on allocation procedures for recycling in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(7): 994–1008

[55] BenettoEDujet CRousseauxP. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer, 2018

[56] International Renewable Energy Agency. International Co-operation to Accelerate Green Hydrogen Deployment. 2024

[57] Zhao H, Kamp L M, Lukszo Z. The potential of green ammonia production to reduce renewable power curtailment and encourage the energy transition in China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(44): 18935–18954

[58] Zhang W F, Dou Z X, He P. . New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertiliser in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(21): 8375–8380

[59] Ajanovic A.. , Sayer, M. & Haas, R. The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(57): 24136–24154

[60] CarraraS, Alves Dias P, PlazzottaB, et al. Raw Materials Demand for Wind and Solar Photovoltaics Technologies in the Transition Towards a Decarbonised Energy System. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union, 2020

[61] Faber G, Ruttinger A, Strunge T. . Adapting technology learning curves for prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessments of emerging carbon capture and utilization pathways. Frontiers in Climate, 2022, 4: 820261

[62] Ukoba K, Onisuru O R, Jen T H. Harnessing machine learning for sustainable futures: Advancements in renewable energy and climate change mitigation. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2024, 48: 99

[63] Bhowmik R, Banerjee R, Sharma M. . Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: A review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high-temperature water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(25): 12948–12967

[64] Halim I, Zain N S, Khoo H H. Assessing the feasibility of ammonia utilization for power generation: A techno-economic-environmental study. Applied Energy, 2025, 386: 125581

[65] Schmidt O, Gambhir A, Staffell I. . Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(52): 30470–30492

[66] Shamet O, Antar M. Mechanical vapor compression desalination technology—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 187: 113757

[67] Küngas R, Blennow P, Heiredal-Clausen T. . Progress in SOEC development activities at Haldor Topsøe. ECS Transactions, 2019, 91(1): 215–223

[68] Ahmed H S, Yahya Z, Khan W A. . Sustainable pathways to ammonia: A comprehensive review of green production approaches. Clean Energy, 2024, 8(2): 60–72

[69] ArrigoniA, Dolci F, Ortiz CebollaR, et al. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of hydrogen delivery options within Europe. EUR 31941 EN. European Commission. 2024

[70] Yuan P, Chen L, Liu C. . Numerical studies on hydrogen production from ammonia thermal cracking with catalysts. Energies, 2023, 16(13): 5196

[71] Giddey S, Badwal S P S, Munnings C. . Ammonia as a renewable energy transportation media. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(11): 10231–10239

[72] Cho H H, Strezov V, Evans T J. Life cycle assessment of renewable hydrogen transport by ammonia. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 94: 1018–1035

[73] Asif M, Bibi S S, Ahmed S. . Recent advances in green hydrogen production, storage and commercial-scale use via catalytic ammonia cracking. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 473: 145381

[74] Trangwachirachai K, Rouwenhorst K, Lefferts L. . Recent progress on ammonia cracking technologies for scalable hydrogen production. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2024, 49: 100945

[75] Lamb K E, Viano D M, Langley M J. . High-purity H₂ produced from NH₃ via a ruthenium-based decomposition catalyst and vanadium-based membrane. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(23): 7811–7816

[76] Dickson R, Akhtar MS, Abbas A. . Global transportation of green hydrogen via liquid carriers: Economic and environmental sustainability analysis, policy implications, and future directions. Green Chemistry, 2022, 24: 8484–8493

[77] Raab M, Maier S, Dietrich R-U. Comparative techno-economic assessment of a large-scale hydrogen transport via liquid transport media. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(21): 11956–11968

[78] Wang B, Li T, Gong F. . Ammonia as a green energy carrier: electrochemical synthesis and direct ammonia fuel cell—A comprehensive review. Fuel Processing Technology, 2022, 235: 107380

[79] International Renewable Energy Agency, RMI . Creating a Global Hydrogen Market: Certification to Enable Trade. 2023

[80] G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration . 2025-1-1, available at website of Indian Government

[81] PiriaR, Teichmann F, HonnenJ, et al. Critical Review of the Draft IPHE Methodology on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production. Adephi. 2021, available at the website of Oeko Institute

[82] Widmer J, Christ B, Grenz J. . Agrivoltaics, a promising new tool for electricity and food production: A systematic review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 192: 114277

[83] Matthias F, Schau E, Lehmann A. . Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2010, 2(10): 3309–3322

[84] Valdivia S, Ugaya C, Hildenbrand J. . A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—Our contribution to Rio+20. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 18: 1673–1685

[85] Tock L, Maréchal F, Perrenoud M. Thermo-environomic evaluation of the ammonia production. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 93: 356–362

[86] Azapagic A. Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 73(1): 1–21

[87] Bleischwitz R, Spataru C, Vandeveer S D. . Resource nexus perspectives towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(12): 737–743

[88] Galloway J N, Townsend A R, Erisman J W. . Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science, 2008, 320(5878): 889–892

[89] De Bellis J, Baranzelli C, Lavalle C. . Toward a harmonised approach for food-energy-water nexus assessments: A review of water resources and agricultural production. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(12): 123001

[90] Guillén-Gosálbez G, You F, Galán-Martín A. . Process systems engineering thinking and tools applied to sustainability problems: Current landscape and future opportunities. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2019, 26: 170–179

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2025