Multi-objective optimization of molten carbonate fuel cell system for reducing CO2 emission from exhaust gases

Ramin ROSHANDEL , Majid ASTANEH , Farzin GOLZAR

Front. Energy ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 106 -114.

PDF (482KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 106 -114. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-014-0341-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Multi-objective optimization of molten carbonate fuel cell system for reducing CO2 emission from exhaust gases

Author information +
History +
PDF (482KB)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the implementation of a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) as a CO2 separator. By applying multi-objective optimization (MOO) using the genetic algorithm, the optimal values of operating load and the corresponding values of objective functions are obtained. Objective functions are minimization of the cost of electricity (COE) and minimization of CO2 emission rate. CO2 tax that is accounted as the pollution-related cost, transforming the environmental objective to the cost function. The results show that the MCFC stack which is fed by the syngas and gas turbine exhaust, not only reduces CO2 emission rate, but also produces electricity and reduces environmental cost of the system.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) / multi-objective optimization (MOO) / Pareto curve / genetic algorithm / CO2 separation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ramin ROSHANDEL, Majid ASTANEH, Farzin GOLZAR. Multi-objective optimization of molten carbonate fuel cell system for reducing CO2 emission from exhaust gases. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(1): 106-114 DOI:10.1007/s11708-014-0341-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Caprile L, Passalacqua B, Torazza A. Carbon capture: Energy wasting technologies or the MCFCs challenge? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(16): 10269–10277

[2]

Desideri U. MCFC as potential concentrators in distributed generation systems: technical problems and challenges. Workshop in Fuel Cells in the Carbon Cycle,Napoli, Italy, 2010

[3]

Desideri U, Proietti S, Sdringola P, Cinti G, Curbis F. MCFC-based CO2 capture system for small scale CHP plants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(24): 19295–19303

[4]

Jansen D, Oudhuis A B J, van Veen H M. CO2 reduction potential of future coal gasification based power generation technologies. Energy Conversion and Management, 1992, 33(5–8): 365–372

[5]

Jansen D, van der Laag P C, Oudhuis A B J, Ribberink J S. Prospects for advanced coal-fuelled fuel cell power plants. Journal of Power Sources, 1994, 49(1–3): 151–165

[6]

Oh K S, Kim T S. Performance analysis on various system layouts for the combination of an ambient pressure molten carbonate fuel cell and a gas turbine. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 158(1): 455–463

[7]

Desideri U, Proietti S, Cinti G, Sdringola P, Rossi C. Analysis of pollutant emissions from cogeneration and district heating systems aimed to a feasibility study of MCFC technology for carbon dioxide separation asretrofitting of existing plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(6): 1663–1673

[8]

Campanari S. Carbon dioxide separation from high temperature fuel cell power plants. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 112(1): 273– 289

[9]

Lusardi M, Bosio B, Arato E. An example of innovative application in fuel cell system development: CO2 segregation using molten carbonate fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 131(1–2): 351–360

[10]

Discepoli G, Cinti G, Desideri U, Penchini D, Proietti S. Carbon capture with molten carbonate fuel cells: Experimental tests and fuel cell performance assessment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 9: 372–384

[11]

Milewski J, Lewandowski J. Separating CO2 from flue gases using a molten carbonate fuel cell. IERI Procedia, 2012, 1: 232–237

[12]

Marler R T, Arora J S. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26(6): 369–395

[13]

U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. sulfur content (weighted average) of crude oil input to refineries. 2012-03-23

[14]

Farina L, Bressan L. Solving the heavy fuel oil problem. Heat Engine, 1998, 62: 24–28

[15]

Greppi P, Bosio B, Arato E. Feasibility of the integration of a molten carbonate fuel-cell system and an integrated gasification combined cycle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(20): 8664–8669

[16]

Spallina V, Romano M C, Campanari S, Lozza G. Application of MCFC in coal gasification plants for high efficiency CO2 capture. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2012, 134(1): 011701

[17]

Baranak M, Atakul H. A basic model for analysis of molten carbonate fuel cell behaviour. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 172(2): 831–839

[18]

Morita H, Komoda M, Mugikura Y, Izaki Y, Watanabe T, Masuda Y, Matsuyama T. Performance analysis of molten carbonate fuel cell using a Li/Na electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 112(2): 509–518

[19]

Song S A, Han J, Yoon S P, Nam S W, Oh I H, Choi D K. Economic feasibility study for Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells fed with biogas. Journal of Electrochemical Science and Technology, 2010, 1(2): 102–111

[20]

Argus Media. Argus Asphalt Report Issue 14–31. 2014-08-01

[21]

Carbon Tax Center (CTC). Where carbon is taxed? 2014-10-31

[22]

Milewski J, Wolowicz M, Miller A, Bernat R. A reduced order model of molten carbonate fuel cell: a proposal. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(26): 11565–11575

[23]

International Energy Agency. Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation. 2011

[24]

Ruth M F, Antkowiak M. Analysis of fuel cell integration with biofuels production. 2013-05-14

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (482KB)

3742

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/