Emission components characteristics of a bi-fuel vehicle at idling condition

Abstract

Natural gas (NG) represents today a promising alternative to conventional fuels for road vehicles propulsion, since it is characterized by a relatively low cost, better geopolitical distribution than oil, and lower environmental impact. This explains the current spreading of compressed natural gas (CNG) fuelled spark ignition (SI) engine, above all in the bi-fuel version, which is able to run either with gasoline or with NG. However, the aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the emission characteristics at idling condition. The vehicle engine was converted to bi-fueling system from a gasoline engine, and operated separately either with gasoline or CNG. Two different fuel injection systems (i.e., multi-point injection (MPI)-sequential and closed-loop venturi-continuous) are used, and their influences on the formation of emissions at different operating conditions are examined. A detailed comparative analysis of the engine exhaust emissions using gasoline and CNG is made. The results indicate that the CNG shows low air index and lower emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and total hydrocarbon (THC) compared to gasoline.

Keywords

road vehicle engine / fuel injection systems / carbon monoxide (CO) / carbon dioxide (CO₂) / total hydrocarbon (THC) / vehicle idle conditions / air index

References

[1] Mage D, Zali O. Motor Vehicle Air Pollution: Public Health Impact and Control Measures. WHO Report, Geneva, 1992

[2] Das L M, Gulati R, Gupta P K. A comparative evaluation of the performance characteristics of a spark ignition engine using hydrogen and compressed natural gas as alternative fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2000, 25(8): 783-793

[3] Nylund N O, Laurikko J, Ikonen M. Pathways for Natural Gas into Advanced Vehicles. IANGV (International Association for Natural Gas Vehicle) Report, 2002

[4] Aslam M U, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A, Kalam M A, Mahlia T M IZainon Z, Amalina M A, Abdesselam H. Introduction of natural gas fueled automotive in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of TECHPOS’03, UM, Malaysia, 2003, 156-161

[5] Heywood J B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988

[6] Kalam M A, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A. Gasoline engine operated on compressed natural gas. In: Proceedings of Advances in Malaysian Energy Research (AMER), Malaysia, 2001, 307-316

[7] Beck N J, Barkhimer R L, Johnson W P, Wong H C, Gebert K. Evolution heavy duty natural gas engines-stiochiometric, carbureted and spark ignited to lean of burn, fuel injected and micro-pilot. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1997, 972665

[8] Aslam M U, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A, Kalam M A. Prospect of CNG as an automotive fuel instead of gasoline. In: Proceedings of 7th APISCEU, Hong Kong, 2004, 15-17

[9] Bach C, Lammle C, Bill R, Soltic P, Dyntar D, Janner P, Boulouchos K, Onder C, Landenfeld T, Kercher L , Seel O, Baronick J D. Clean engine vehicle-A natural gas driven Euro-4/SULEV with 30% reduced CO₂-emissions. SAE Technical Paper Series, 2004, 010645

[10] Thomas F, Staunton R H. What fuel economy improvement technologies could aid the competitiveness of light-duty natural gas vehicles. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1999, 01-1511

[11] Nagayama I. Effects of swirl and squish on SI engine combustion and emission. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1977, 770217

[12] Kent J C. Observations on the Effects of intake-generated swirl and tumble on combustion duration. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1989, 892096

[13] Haddad O, Denbratt I. Turbulence characteristics of tumbling air motion in four-valve SI engines and their correlation with combustion parameters. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1991, 910478

[14] Sakurai T. Basic research on combustion chambers for lean burn gas engines. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1993, 932710

[15] Evans R L. Combustion chamber design for a lean-burn SI engine. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1992, 921545

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg