Functional and structural characterization of missense mutations in PAX6 gene

S. Udhaya Kumar, N. Priyanka, P. Sneha, C. George Priya Doss

PDF(661 KB)
PDF(661 KB)
Front. Biol. ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 377-385. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-015-1346-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Functional and structural characterization of missense mutations in PAX6 gene

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The PAX6 gene belongs to the Paired box (PAX) family of transcription factors that is tissue specific and required for the differentiation and proliferation of cells in embryonic development. PAX6 regulates the pattern formation in early developmental stages. This function of PAX6 protein enables the successful completion of neurogenesis and oculogenesis in most animals such as mice, Drosophila and some other model organisms including humans. A variation in the sequence of PAX6 gene may alter the function and structure of the protein. Such changes can produce adverse effects on functioning of the PAX6 protein which were clinically observed to occur in a broad range of ocular defects such as aniridia in humans. We employed in silico prediction methods such as SIFT, PolyPhen 2; I mutant 3.0, SNAP, SNPs&GO, and PHD-SNP to screen the pathogenic missense mutation in PAX6 and DNA binding sites by BindN and BindN+ . Furthermore, we employed KD4V server to examine the structural and functional modifications that occur in the PAX6 protein as a result of mutation. Based on the results obtained from the in silico prediction methods, we carried out modeling analysis for V53L, I56T, G64V, and I87R to visualize the impact of mutation in structural context.

Keywords

PAX6 / missense mutation / DNA-protein

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
S. Udhaya Kumar, N. Priyanka, P. Sneha, C. George Priya Doss. Functional and structural characterization of missense mutations in PAX6 gene. Front. Biol., 2015, 10(4): 377‒385 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-015-1346-2

References

[1]
Acharya V, Nagarajaram H A (2012). Hansa: an automated method for discriminating disease and neutral human nsSNPs. Hum Mutat, 33(2): 332–337
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Adzhubei I A, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky V E, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov A S, Sunyaev S R (2010). A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods, 7(4): 248–249
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Azuma N, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H, Tadokoro K, Asaka A, Kawase E, Yamada M (2003). Mutations of the PAX6 gene detected in patients with a variety of optic-nerve malformations. Am J Hum Genet, 72(6): 1565–1570
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Bromberg Y, Rost B (2007). SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucleic Acids Res, 35(11): 3823–3835
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Bromberg Y, Yachdav G, Rost B (2008). SNAP predicts effect of mutations on protein function. Bioinformatics, 24(20): 2397–2398
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
George Priya Doss C, Rajith B, Chakraborty C (2013). Predicting the impact of deleterious mutations in the protein kinase domain of FGFR2 in the context of function, structure, and pathogenesis—a bioinformatics approach. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 170(8): 1853–1870
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli P L, Casadio R (2009). Functional annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in proteins. Hum Mutat, 30(8): 1237–1244
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Casadio R (2006). Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics, 22(22): 2729–2734
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Rossi I, Casadio R (2008). A three-state prediction of single point mutations on protein stability changes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(2 Suppl 2): S6
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Davis L K, Meyer K J, Rudd D S, Librant A L, Epping E A, Sheffield V C, Wassink T H (2008). Pax6 3′ deletion results in aniridia, autism and mental retardation. Hum Genet, 123(4): 371–378
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
George Priya Doss C, Rajith B, Garwasis N, Mathew P R, Raju A S, Apoorva K, William D, Sadhana N R, Himani T, Dike I P (2012). Screening of mutations affecting protein stability and dynamics of FGFR1—A simulation analysis. Applied & Translational Genomics., 1: 37–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Grønskov K, Rosenberg T, Sand A, Brøndum-Nielsen K (1999). Mutational analysis of PAX6: 16 novel mutations including 5 missense mutations with a mild aniridia phenotype. Eur J Hum Genet, 7(3): 274–286
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring W J (1995). Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science, 267(5205): 1788–1792
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Hanson I, Churchill A, Love J, Axton R, Moore T, Clarke M, Meire F, van Heyningen V (1999). Missense mutations in the most ancient residues of the PAX6 paired domain underlie a spectrum of human congenital eye malformations. Hum Mol Genet, 8(2): 165–172
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Hanson I M, Fletcher J M, Jordan T, Brown A, Taylor D, Adams R J, Punnett H H, van Heyningen V (1994). Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters’ anomaly. Nat Genet, 6(2): 168–173
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Hill R E, Favor J, Hogan B L, Ton C C, Saunders G F, Hanson I M, Prosser J, Jordan T, Hastie N D, van Heyningen V (1991). Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature, 354(6354): 522–525
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Kaplan W, Littlejohn T G (2001). Swiss-PDB Viewer (Deep View). Brief Bioinform, 2(2): 195–197
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Lill M A, Danielson M L (2011). Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. J Comput Aided Mol Des, 25(1): 13–19
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Luu TD, Rusu A, Walter V, Linard B, Poidevin L, Ripp R, Moulinier L, Muller J, Raffelsberger W, Wicker N, Lecompte O, Thompson JD, Poch O, Nguyen H (2012). KD4v: comprehensible knowledge discovery system for missense variant. Nucl Acids Res, W71–W75
[20]
Matsuo O Y N. Noji S, Ohuchi H, Koyama E, Myokai F, Matsuo N, Taniguchi S, Doi H, Iseki S, Ninomiya Y, Fujiwara M,Watanabe T , Eto K (1993). A mutation in the pax6 gene in rat small eye is associated with impaired migration of mid-brain crest cells. Nat Genet, 3: 299–304
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Maulbecker C C, Gruss P (1993). The oncogenic potential of Pax genes. EMBO J, 12(6): 2361–2367
Pubmed
[22]
McCulley T J, Mayer K, Dahr S S, Simpson J, Holland E J (2005). Aniridia and optic nerve hypoplasia. Eye (Lond), 19(7): 762–764
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Mi H, Guo N, Kejariwal A, Thomas P D (2007). PANTHER version 6: protein sequence and function evolution data with expanded representation of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res, 35(Database issue): D247–D252
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Mishra R, Gorlov I P, Chao L Y, Singh S, Saunders G F (2002). PAX6, paired domain influences sequence recognition by the homeodomain. J Biol Chem, 277(51): 49488–49494
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Ng P C, Henikoff S (2003). SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res, 31(13): 3812–3814
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Nishikawa K, Ishino S, Takenaka H, Norioka N, Hirai T, Yao T, Seto Y (1994). Constructing a protein mutant database. Protein Eng, 7(5): 733
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Osumi N, Hirota A, Ohuchi H, Nakafuku M, Iimura T, Kuratani S, Fujiwara M, Noji S, Eto K (1997). Pax-6 is involved in the specification of hindbrain motor neuron subtype. Development, 124(15): 2961–2972
Pubmed
[28]
Puk O, Yan X, Sabrautzki S, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Hrabě de Angelis M, Graw J (2013). Novel small-eye allele in paired box gene 6 (Pax6) is caused by a point mutation in intron 7 and creates a new exon. Mol Vis, 19: 877–884
Pubmed
[29]
Sherry S T, Ward M, Sirotkin K (1999). dbSNP-database for single nucleotide polymorphisms and other classes of minor genetic variation. Genome Res, 9(8): 677–679
Pubmed
[30]
Stromo G D ( 2000). DNA binding sites: Representation and discovery. Bioinformatics, 16(1): 16–23
[31]
The UniProt Consortium (2008). The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res, 36: D190–D195
[32]
Tzoulaki I, White I M, Hanson I M (2005). PAX6 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet, 6(1): 27
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
van Heyningen V, Williamson K A (2002). PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet, 11(10): 1161–1167
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Wang L, Brown S J(2006). Bind N: A web based tool for efficient prediction of DNA and RNA binding site in amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 34: W243–248
[35]
Wang L, Huang C, Yang MQ, Yang JY ( 2010). BindN+ for accurate prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residue from protein sequence features. BMC Syst Biol, 4: S3
[36]
Wawersik S, Maas R L (2000). Vertebrate eye development as modeled in Drosophila. Hum Mol Genet, 9(6): 917–925
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Wawrocka A, Sikora A, Kuszel L, Krawczynski M R (2013). 11p13 deletions can be more frequent than the PAX6 gene point mutations in Polish patients with aniridia. J Appl Genet, 54(3): 345–351
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(661 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/