Comparative analysis of chromosome segregation in human, yeasts and trypanosome

Xianxian HAN, Ziyin LI

PDF(448 KB)
PDF(448 KB)
Front. Biol. ›› 2014, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (6) : 472-480. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-014-1334-y
REVIEW
REVIEW

Comparative analysis of chromosome segregation in human, yeasts and trypanosome

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Chromosome segregation is a tightly regulated process through which duplicated genetic materials are equally partitioned into daughter cells. During the past decades, tremendous efforts have been made to understand the molecular mechanism of chromosome segregation using animals and yeasts as model systems. Recently, new insights into chromosome segregation have gradually emerged using trypanosome, an early branching parasitic protozoan, as a model organism. To uncover the unique aspects of chromosome segregation in trypanosome, which potentially could serve as new drug targets for anti-trypanosome chemotherapy, it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis of the chromosome segregation machinery between trypanosome and its human host. Here, we briefly review the current knowledge about chromosome segregation in human and Trypanosoma brucei, with a focus on the regulation of cohesin and securin degradation triggered by the activation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). We also include yeasts in our comparative analysis since some of the original discoveries were made using budding and fission yeasts as the model organisms and, therefore, these could provide hints about the evolution of the machinery. We highlight both common and unique features in these model systems and also provide perspectives for future research in trypanosome.

Keywords

cohesin / separase / securin / anaphase promoting complex / spindle assembly checkpoint / Trypanosoma brucei

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xianxian HAN, Ziyin LI. Comparative analysis of chromosome segregation in human, yeasts and trypanosome. Front. Biol., 2014, 9(6): 472‒480 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-014-1334-y

References

[1]
Akiyoshi B, Gull K (2013). Evolutionary cell biology of chromosome segregation: insights from trypanosomes. Open Biol, 3(5): 130023
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Beckouët F, Hu B, Roig M B, Sutani T, Komata M, Uluocak P, Katis V L, Shirahige K, Nasmyth K (2010). An Smc3 acetylation cycle is essential for establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell, 39(5): 689-699
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Bessat M, Ersfeld K (2009). Functional characterization of cohesin SMC3 and separase and their roles in the segregation of large and minichromosomes in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Microbiol, 71(6): 1371-1385
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Bessat M, Knudsen G, Burlingame A L, Wang C C (2013). A minimal anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS ONE, 8(3): e59258
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Brues A M, Cohen A(1936). Effects of colchicine and related substances on cell division. Biochem J, 30: 1363-1368
[6]
Buschhorn B A, Peters J M (2006). How APC/C orders destruction. Nat Cell Biol, 8(3): 209-211
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Chestukhin A, Pfeffer C, Milligan S, DeCaprio J A, Pellman D (2003). Processing, localization, and requirement of human separase for normal anaphase progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100(8): 4574-4579
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Shevchenko A, Nasmyth K (2000). Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell, 5(2): 243-254
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Ciosk R, Zachariae W, Michaelis C, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Nasmyth K (1998). An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell, 93(6): 1067-1076
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Cohen-Fix O, Peters J M, Kirschner M W, Koshland D (1996). Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev, 10(24): 3081-3093
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
da Fonseca P C, Kong E H, Zhang Z, Schreiber A, Williams M A, Morris E P, Barford D (2011). Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature, 470(7333): 274-278
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
de Gramont A, Cohen-Fix O (2005). The many phases of anaphase. Trends Biochem Sci, 30(10): 559-568
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Ersfeld K, Gull K (1997). Partitioning of large and minichromosomes in Trypanosoma brucei. Science, 276(5312): 611-614
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Ersfeld K, Melville S E, Gull K (1999). Nuclear and genome organization of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitol Today, 15(2): 58-63
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Fernius J, Nerusheva O O, Galander S, Alves F L, Rappsilber J, Marston A L (2013). Cohesin-dependent association of scc2/4 with the centromere initiates pericentromeric cohesion establishment. Curr Biol, 23(7): 599-606
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Funabiki H, Yamano H, Kumada K, Nagao K, Hunt T, Yanagida M (1996). Cut2 proteolysis required for sister-chromatid seperation in fission yeast. Nature, 381(6581): 438-441
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Gluenz E, Sharma R, Carrington M, Gull K (2008). Functional characterization of cohesin subunit SCC1 in Trypanosoma brucei and dissection of mutant phenotypes in two life cycle stages. Mol Microbiol, 69(3): 666-680
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Gorr I H, Boos D, Stemmann O (2005). Mutual inhibition of separase and Cdk1 by two-step complex formation. Mol Cell, 19(1): 135-141
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Gutiérrez-Caballero C, Herrán Y, Sánchez-Martín M, Suja J A, Barbero J L, Llano E, Pendás A M (2011). Identification and molecular characterization of the mammalian α-kleisin RAD21L. Cell Cycle, 10(9): 1477-1487
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich C M, Mechtler K, Peters J M (2005). Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol, 3(3): e69
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Heinrich S, Windecker H, Hustedt N, Hauf S (2012). Mph1 kinetochore localization is crucial and upstream in the hierarchy of spindle assembly checkpoint protein recruitment to kinetochores. J Cell Sci, 125(Pt 20): 4720-4727
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Holt L J, Krutchinsky A N, Morgan D O (2008). Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature, 454(7202): 353-357
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Hornig N C, Knowles P P, McDonald N Q, Uhlmann F (2002). The dual mechanism of separase regulation by securin. Curr Biol, 12(12): 973-982
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Hoyt M A, Totis L, Roberts B T (1991). S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell, 66(3): 507-517
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Irniger S, Piatti S, Michaelis C, Nasmyth K (1995). Genes involved in sister chromatid separation are needed for B-type cyclin proteolysis in budding yeast. Cell, 81(2): 269-278
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Ishiguro K, Kim J, Fujiyama-Nakamura S, Kato S, Watanabe Y (2011). A new meiosis-specific cohesin complex implicated in the cohesin code for homologous pairing. EMBO Rep, 12(3): 267-275
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Ivanov D, Schleiffer A, Eisenhaber F, Mechtler K, Haering C H, Nasmyth K (2002). Eco1 is a novel acetyltransferase that can acetylate proteins involved in cohesion. Curr Biol, 12(4): 323-328
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Jäger H, Herzig A, Lehner C F, Heidmann S (2001). Drosophila separase is required for sister chromatid separation and binds to PIM and THR. Genes Dev, 15(19): 2572-2584
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Jallepalli P V, Waizenegger I C, Bunz F, Langer S, Speicher M R, Peters J M, Kinzler K W, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C (2001). Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell, 105(4): 445-457
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Jensen S, Segal M, Clarke D J, Reed S I (2001). A novel role of the budding yeast separin Esp1 in anaphase spindle elongation: evidence that proper spindle association of Esp1 is regulated by Pds1. J Cell Biol, 152(1): 27-40
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Kakar S S, Jennes L (1999). Molecular cloning and characterization of the tumor transforming gene (TUTR1): a novel gene in human tumorigenesis. Cytogenet Cell Genet, 84(3-4): 211-216
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Kateneva A V, Higgins J M (2009). Shugoshin and PP2A: collaborating to keep chromosomes connected. Dev Cell, 17(3): 303-305
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
King R W, Peters J M, Tugendreich S, Rolfe M, Hieter P, Kirschner M W (1995). A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell, 81(2): 279-288
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Kumada K, Nakamura T, Nagao K, Funabiki H, Nakagawa T, Yanagida M (1998). Cut1 is loaded onto the spindle by binding to Cut2 and promotes anaphase spindle movement upon Cut2 proteolysis. Curr Biol, 8(11): 633-641
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
Kumar P, Wang C C (2006). Dissociation of cytokinesis initiation from mitotic control in a eukaryote. Eukaryot Cell, 5(1): 92-102
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Lee J, Hirano T (2011). RAD21L, a novel cohesin subunit implicated in linking homologous chromosomes in mammalian meiosis. J Cell Biol, 192(2): 263-276
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Li R, Murray A W (1991). Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell, 66(3): 519-531
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Li Z (2012). Regulation of the cell division cycle in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot Cell, 11(10): 1180-1190
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[39]
Li Z, Wang C C (2002). Functional characterization of the 11 non-ATPase subunit proteins in the trypanosome 19 S proteasomal regulatory complex. J Biol Chem, 277(45): 42686-42693
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[40]
Lyons N A, Morgan D O (2011). Cdk1-dependent destruction of Eco1 prevents cohesion establishment after S phase. Mol Cell, 42(3): 378-389
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Matsuo K, Ohsumi K, Iwabuchi M, Kawamata T, Ono Y, Takahashi M (2012). Kendrin is a novel substrate for separase involved in the licensing of centriole duplication. Curr Biol, 22(10): 915-921
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Maure J F, Kitamura E, Tanaka T U (2007). Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol, 17(24): 2175-2182
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
McGrew J T, Goetsch L, Byers B, Baum P (1992). Requirement for ESP1 in the nuclear division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell, 3(12): 1443-1454
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[44]
Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K (1997). Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell, 91(1): 35-45
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[45]
Pati D (2008). Oncogenic activity of separase. Cell Cycle, 7(22): 3481-3482
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Pei L, Melmed S (1997). Isolation and characterization of a pituitary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG). Mol Endocrinol, 11(4): 433-441
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[47]
Ploubidou A, Robinson D R, Docherty R C, Ogbadoyi E O, Gull K (1999). Evidence for novel cell cycle checkpoints in trypanosomes: kinetoplast segregation and cytokinesis in the absence of mitosis. J Cell Sci, 112(Pt 24): 4641-4650
Pubmed
[48]
Shou W, Seol J H, Shevchenko A, Baskerville C, Moazed D, Chen Z W, Jang J, Shevchenko A, Charbonneau H, Deshaies R J (1999). Exit from mitosis is triggered by Tem1-dependent release of the protein phosphatase Cdc14 from nucleolar RENT complex. Cell, 97(2): 233-244
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[49]
Stemmann O, Zou H, Gerber S A, Gygi S P, Kirschner M W (2001). Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell, 107(6): 715-726
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[50]
Sudakin V, Chan G K, Yen T J (2001). Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol, 154(5): 925-936
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[51]
Sudakin V, Ganoth D, Dahan A, Heller H, Hershko J, Luca F C, Ruderman J V, Hershko A (1995). The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis. Mol Biol Cell, 6(2): 185-197
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[52]
Sullivan M, Lehane C, Uhlmann F (2001). Orchestrating anaphase and mitotic exit: separase cleavage and localization of Slk19. Nat Cell Biol, 3(9): 771-777
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[53]
Tsou M F, Wang W J, George K A, Uryu K, Stearns T, Jallepalli P V (2009). Polo kinase and separase regulate the mitotic licensing of centriole duplication in human cells. Dev Cell, 17(3): 344-354
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[54]
Uhlmann F (2011). Cohesin subunit Rad21L, the new kid on the block has new ideas. EMBO Rep, 12(3): 183-184
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[55]
Uhlmann F, Lottspeich F, Nasmyth K (1999). Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature, 400(6739): 37-42
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[56]
Uhlmann F, Wernic D, Poupart M A, Koonin E V, Nasmyth K (2000). Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell, 103(3): 375-386
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[57]
Uzawa S, Samejima I, Hirano T, Tanaka K, Yanagida M (1990). The fission yeast cut1+ gene regulates spindle pole body duplication and has homology to the budding yeast ESP1 gene. Cell, 62(5): 913-925
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[58]
Viadiu H, Stemmann O, Kirschner M W, Walz T (2005). Domain structure of separase and its binding to securin as determined by EM. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 12(6): 552-553
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[59]
Vigneron S, Prieto S, Bernis C, Labbé J C, Castro A, Lorca T (2004). Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol Biol Cell, 15(10): 4584-4596
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[60]
Vlotides G, Eigler T, Melmed S (2007). Pituitary tumor-transforming gene: physiology and implications for tumorigenesis. Endocr Rev, 28(2): 165-186
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[61]
Waizenegger I, Giménez-Abián J F, Wernic D, Peters J M (2002). Regulation of human separase by securin binding and autocleavage. Curr Biol, 12(16): 1368-1378
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[62]
Weiss E, Winey M (1996). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol, 132(1-2): 111-123
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[63]
Wirth K G, Wutz G, Kudo N R, Desdouets C, Zetterberg A, Taghybeeglu S, Seznec J, Ducos G M, Ricci R, Firnberg N, Peters J M, Nasmyth K (2006). Separase: a universal trigger for sister chromatid disjunction but not chromosome cycle progression. J Cell Biol, 172(6): 847-860
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[64]
Xiong B, Lu S, Gerton J L (2010). Hos1 is a lysine deacetylase for the Smc3 subunit of cohesin. Curr Biol, 20(18): 1660-1665
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[65]
Zhang N, Ge G, Meyer R, Sethi S, Basu D, Pradhan S, Zhao Y J, Li X N, Cai W W, El-Naggar A K, Baladandayuthapani V, Kittrell F S, Rao P H, Medina D, Pati D (2008). Overexpression of Separase induces aneuploidy and mammary tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(35): 13033-13038
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[66]
Zhang X, Horwitz G A, Prezant T R, Valentini A, Nakashima M, Bronstein M D, Melmed S (1999). Structure, expression, and function of human pituitary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG). Mol Endocrinol, 13(1): 156-166
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[67]
Zou H, McGarry T J, Bernal T, Kirschner M W (1999). Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science, 285(5426): 418-422
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[68]
Zou H, Stemman O, Anderson J S, Mann M, Kirschner M W (2002). Anaphase specific auto-cleavage of separase. FEBS Lett, 528(1-3): 246-250
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We apologize to our colleagues whose work could not be cited due to space constraints. Work in the Li laboratory is supported by NIH grants R01AI101437 and R21AI093897.
Compliance with ethics guidelines

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(448 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/