PDF(80 KB)
Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological
significance
- CHEN Liding1, FU Bojie1, ZHAO Wenwu2
Author information
+
1.Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2.Institute of Resources Management, College of Resources and Technology, Beijing Normal University;
Show less
History
+
Published |
05 Jun 2008 |
Issue Date |
05 Jun 2008 |
Abstract
Exploring the relationships between landscape pattern and ecological processes is the key topic of landscape ecology, for which, a large number of indices as well as landscape pattern analysis model were developed. However, one problem faced by landscape ecologists is that it is hard to link the landscape indices with a specific ecological process. Linking landscape pattern and ecological processes has become a challenge for landscape ecologists. “Source” and “sink” are common concepts used in air pollution research, by which the movement direction and pattern of different pollutants in air can be clearly identified. In fact, for any ecological process, the research can be considered as a balance between the source and the sink in space. Thus, the concepts of “source” and “sink” could be implemented to the research of landscape pattern and ecological processes. In this paper, a theory of source-sink landscape was proposed, which include: (1) In the research of landscape pattern and ecological process, all landscape types can be divided into two groups, “source” landscape and “sink” landscape. “Source” landscape contributes positively to the ecological process, while “sink” landscape is unhelpful to the ecological process. (2) Both landscapes are recognized with regard to the specific ecological process. “Source” landscape in a target ecological process may change into a “sink” landscape as in another ecological process. Therefore, the ecological process should be determined before “source” or “sink” landscape were defined. (3) The key point to distinguish “source” landscape from “sink” landscape is to quantify the effect of landscape on ecological process. The positive effect is made by “source” landscape, and the negative effect by “sink” landscape. (4) For the same ecological process, the contribution of “source” landscapes may vary, and it is the same to the “sink” landscapes. It is required to determine the weight of each landscape type on ecological processes. (5) The source-sink principle can be applied to non-point source pollution control, biologic diversity protection, urban heat island effect mitigation, etc. However, the landscape evaluation models need to be calibrated respectively, because different ecological processes correspond with different source-sink landscapes and evaluation models for the different study areas. This theory is helpful to further study landscape pattern and ecological process, and offers a basis for new landscape index design.
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
CHEN Liding, FU Bojie, ZHAO Wenwu.
Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological
significance. Front. Biol., 2008, 3(2): 131‒136 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0026-x
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
This is a preview of subscription content, contact
us for subscripton.
References
1. Apart A A Raine S R Paterson M S 2002 Mapping and analysis of changes in theripariann landscape structure of the Lockyer Valley catchment, Queensland,AustraliaLandscape and Urban Planning594357. doi:10.1016/S0169‐2046(01)00246‐8
2. Baker W L Cal Y 1992 The rule programsfor multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the grass geographicalinformation systemLandscape Eeology7291302. doi:10.1007/BF00131258
3. Cook E A 2002 Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecologicalnetworksLandscape and Urban Planning58269280. doi:10.1016/S0169‐2046(01)00226‐2
4. Chen L D Li J R Guo X D Fu B J Li G Q 2000 Temporal and spatial characteristicsof surface water quality in Jiyun riverEnvironmental Science21(6)6164(in Chinese)
5. Chen L D Fu B J Zhang S R Qiu J Yang F L Guo X D 2002 A comparative study on the dynamics of non-point sourcepollution in a heterogeneous landscapeActaEcologica Sinica22(6)808816 (in Chinese)
6. Chen L D Fu B J Zhang S R Qiu J Yang F L 2003a Seasonal change of solvablenitrogen in surface water of Yuqiao reservoir basinChina Environmental Science23(2)210214 (in Chinese)
7. Chen L D Fu B J Xu J Y Gong J 2003b Location-weighted landscape contrast index: a scale independent approachfor landscape pattern evaluation based on “source-sink”ecological processesActa Eeologica Sinica23(11)24062413 (in Chinese)
8. Coper C B Waiters J R 2002 Independenteffects of woodland loss and fragmentation on Brown Treecreeper distributionBiological Conservation105(1)110. doi:10.1016/S0006‐3207(01)00172‐0
9. Deckers B Hermy M Muys B 2004 Factors affecting plant species compositionof hedgerows: relative importance and hierarchyActa Oecologica262337. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2004.03.002
10. Domer B Lertzman K Fall J 2002 Landscape pattern in topegraphically complexlandscapes: issues and techniques for analysisLandscape Ecology17(7)729743
11. Evans R 2005 Monitoring water erosion in lowland England and Wales-apersonal view of its history and outcomesCatena64(2)142161. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.003
12. Fu B J Chen L D Ma K M Wang Y L 2001 The Principle and Application of Landscape EcologyBeijingScience Press (in Chinese)
13. Haase D Halle L 2004 Developmentand perspectives of landscape ecologyLandscapeEcology19567569. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000036198.65352.82
14. Haines-Young R Chopping M 1996 Quantifyinglandscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their applicationto forested landscapesProgress in PhysicalGeography20(4)418445. doi:10.1177/030913339602000403
15. Hessel R Messing I Chen L D Ritsema C Stolte J 2003 Soil erosion simulationsof land use scenarios for a small Loess Plateau catchmentCatena54(1–2)289302. doi:10.1016/S0341‐8162(03)00070‐5
16. Johnson C J Boyce M S Mulders R Gunn A Gau R J Cluff H D Case R L 2004 Quantifyingpatch distribution at multiple spatial scales: applications to wildlife-habitatmodelsLandacape Ecology19(8)869882. doi:10.1007/s10980‐004‐0246‐7
17. Li H B Wu J G 2004 Use and misuseof landscape indicesLandscape Ecology19(4)389399. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6
18. Nassauer J I Corry R C 2004 Using normativescenarios in landscape ecologyLandscapeEcology19(4)343356. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030666.55372.ae
19. Nearing M A Jetten V Bafaut C et al. 2005 Modeling response of soil erosionand runoff to changes in precipitation and coverCatena61(2–3)131154. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2005.03.007
20. Ormml P Foppen R Vos C 2002 Bridging the gap between ecology and spatialplanning in landscape ecologyLandscapeEcology16767779. doi:10.1023/A:1014475908949
21. O'Neillr R V Krumme J R Gardner R H Sugihara G Jackson B DeAngelis D L Milne B T Turner M G Zygmunt B Christensen S W Dale V H Graham R L 1988 Indices of landscape patternLandscapeEcology(1)153162. doi:10.1007/BF00162741
22. Pearson D M 2002 The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelationfor describing pattern in north Australian landscapesJournal of Environmental Management648595. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0523
23. Raines G L 2002 Description and comparison of geologic maps with FRAGSTATS-aspatial statistics programComputers andGeoscienee28169177. doi:10.1016/S0098‐3004(01)00030‐9
24. Stevens V M Polus E Wesselingh R A Schtickzelle N Baguette M 2004 Quantifyingfunctional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specificresistence in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita)Landscape Ecology19(8)829842. doi:10.1007/s10980‐004‐0166‐6
25. Turner M G Garder R H 1991 Quantitativemethods in landscape ecology: an introductionIn: Turner M GQuantitative methods inlandacpe ecologyNew YorkSpringer-Veflng1314
26. Tisehendorf L 2001 Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently?Landscape Ecology16(3)235254. doi:10.1023/A:1011112719782
27. Wu J G 2000 Landscape Ecology-Pattern, Processes, Scale and Leve1BeijingHigherEducation Press (in Chinese)
28. With K A Crist T O 1995 Critical thresholdsin species responses to landscape structureEcology7624462459. doi:10.2307/2265819
29. Xiao D N Li X Z Gao J 2003 Landscape EcologyBeijingScience Press (in Chinese)
30. Zeng H Jiang Z Y Kong N N Gao L Y 2000 Auto-correlation analysis of landscape pattern for a fast urbanizationarea-a case study of Longhua area, Shenzhen CityActa Soientiarum Natualium Unlversitatis Pekinensis36(6)824831 (in Chinese)