Fluctuations and patterns of desert rodent communities under human disturbance: fluctuating tendency and sensitive response of their population

Abstract

The four kinds of sites under different kinds of human disturbances, i.e. a farmland area, a rotational-grazing area, an over-grazing area and a prohibited-grazing area, were selected in the typical region of the Alashan Desert of Inner Mongolia from April to October in 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively. The fluctuating tendency of rodent communities and the sensitive response of their populations were studied using mark-recapture and trap-day methods. The four kinds of mark-recapture samples and line samples were taken in different human disturbance areas. The area of the mark-recapturing sample was 0.95 hm² and that of the line sample was 10 km². The samples were collected every month in the mark-recapturing sites for four consecutive days and in line sites in April, July and October every year. The variable matrix was composed of the numbers of captured rodents of the rodent communities. The sensitive response of the populations in the communities was analyzed with principal component analysis (PCA). Results showed that there were different types of rodent communities under different kinds of human disturbance on two scales in three years. In each scale, there were large differences in both the number of species and the number of main population in the rodent communities under different kinds of human disturbance on the farmland area and over-grazing area especially. The results of PCA showed that the sensitive response of the populations of the commu nities was significantly different under different kinds of human disturbance on the two scales in the three years. Cricetulus barabensis was the most sensitive on the farmland area, there were no differences in sensitive response of the various rodents on the rotational-grazing area, and Dipus sagitta and Phodopus roborovskii were the most sensitive in the over-grazing area.

References

1. Antonio U Gloria D Barbara A E Rosa A S Nuris M Charles F F Robert B T James N M 2000 Small mammals in agri cultural areas ofthe western Uanos of Venezula: Community structure, habitat associationsand relative densitiesJournal of Mammalogy81(2)536548. doi:10.1644/1545‐1542(2000)081<0536:SMIAAO>2.0.CO;2
2. Barbara J D Lake D S Scheiber E G 1998 Habitat structure and regulation of localspecies diversity in a stony, streamEcologicalMonographs68(2)237257
3. Boulinier T Nichols J D Hines J E 2001 Forest Fragmentation and bird communitydynamics: Inference at region scalesEcology82(4)1,1571,169
4. Chen W B Xiao D N Li X Z 2002 The characteristics and contents of landscapespatial analysisActa Ecologica Sinica22(7)1,1351,142(in Chinese)
5. Chen Y F Dong M 2003 Spatial heterogeneityin ecological systemActa Ecologica Sinica23(2)346352(in Chinese)
6. David B L Michael A M Kirsten M P 2000 Habitat fragmentation, landscape contextand mammalian assemblages in Southeastern AustraliaJournal of Mammalogy81(3)787797. doi:10.1644/1545‐1542(2000)081<0787:HFLCAM>2.3.CO;2
7. Davies K F Melbourne B A Margules C R 2001 Effects of within and between patch processeson community dynamics in a fragmentation experimentEcology82(7)1,8301,846
8. Ding S Y 2004 EcologyBeijingScience Press1124(in Chinese)
9. Donovan T M Lamberson R H 2001 Area-sensitivedistributions counteract negative effects of habitat fragmentationon breeding birdsEcology82(4)1,1701,179
10. Forman R T Godron M 1986 LandscapeEcologyNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons
11. Fox B J Fox M D 2000 Factors determiningmammal species richness on habitat islands and isolates: Habitat diversity,disturbance, species interactions and guild assembly rulesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography91937. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2699.2000.00184.x
12. Fu B J Chen L D Ma K M 2001 Principle and Application of LandscapeEcologyBeijingScience Press7380(in Chinese)
13. Hames R S Rosenberg K V Lowe J D 2001 Site reoccupation in fragmented landscapes:Testing predications of metapopulation theoryJournal of Animal Ecology70182190. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2656.2001.00482.x
14. Holling C S 1992 Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecssssosystemsEcological Monograph62(4)447502. doi:10.2307/2937313
15. James L M Steve J P David A E 2001 Scale invariant spatial-temporal patternsof field vole densityJournal of AnimalEcology70101111. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2656.2001.00479.x
16. Jiang H Zhang Y L James R S 2003 Spatial analysis of disturbance and ecosystemsuccessionActa Ecologica Sinica23(9)1,8611,876(in Chinese)
17. Levin S A 1992 The problem of pattern and scale in ecologyEcology731,9431,983. doi:10.2307/1941447
18. Li M H Peng S L Shen W J 2003 Landscape ecology and restoration of degradedecosystemActa Ecologica Sinica23(8)1,6221,628(in Chinese)
19. Li H R 2004 Review on study of biodiversity and ecosystem functioningChinese Journal of Ecology23(3)109114(in Chinese)
20. Liang S C Dong M Wang B S 2004 Fractal characteristics of the distributionpattern of mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhiza populations in southern ChinaMarine ScienceBulletin6(2)9096
21. Lindenmayer D B Mccarthy M A Parris K M 2000 Habitat frag-mentation, landscape context,and mammalian assemblages in southeastern AustraliaJournal of Mammalogy81(3)787797. doi:10.1644/1545‐1542(2000)081<0787:HFLCAM>2.3.CO;2
22. Liu K Ouyang Z Y Wang X K 2003 Eco-environmental sensitivity and itsspatial distribution in Cansu ProvinceActaEcologica Sinica23(12)2,7112,718(in Chinese)
23. Lomolino M V Perault D R 2000 Assembly anddisassembly of mammal communities in a fragmented temperate rain forestEcology81(16)1,5171,532
24. Ma K M Fu B J Chen L D 2004 Progress of landscape ecology studiesIn: Li W HZhao J ZReview and Progress of Ecology StudiesBeijingMeteorologicalPress534553(in Chinese)
25. MacArthur R H Wilson E O 1967 Theory ofIsland BiogeographyPrincetonPrinceton University Press
26. Mackey R L Currie D J 2001 The diversity-disturbancerelationship: Is it generally strong and peakedEcology82(12)3,4793,492
27. Mark V L David R P 2000 Assembly anddisassembly of mammal communities in a fragmented temperate rain forestEcology81(6)1,5171,532
28. Matthew J B Norman A S 2001 Diversityof a grassland rodent community at varying temporal scales: The roleof ecologically dominant speciesJournalof Mammalogy82(4)974983. doi:10.1644/1545‐1542(2001)082<0974:DOAGRC>2.0.CO;2
29. McCarthy M A Lindenmayer D B 1999 Incorporatingmeta-population dynamics of greater gliders into reserve design indisturbed landscapesEcology80651667
30. Nupp T E Swihart R K 2000 Landscape-levelcorrelates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmlandJ Mamm81(2)512526. doi:10.1644/1545‐1542(2000)081<0512:LLCOSM>2.0.CO;2
31. Ouyang Z Y Wang X K Miao H 2000 China's eco-environmental sensitivityand its spatial heterogeneityActa EcologicaSinica20(1)912(in Chinese)
32. Pulliam H R Dunning J B Liu J 1992 Population dynamics in complex landscape:A case studyEcological Applications2165177. doi:10.2307/1941773
33. Rosenzweig M L 1995 Species Diversity in Space and TimeCambridge, United KingdomCambridgeUniversity Press
34. Steen H Ims R A Sonerud G A 1996 Spatial and temporal patterns of small-rodentpopulation dynamics at a regional scaleEcology772,3652,372. doi:10.2307/2265738
35. Steephen E W Hellene M John W 2002 Spatial scale, species diversity and habitatstructure small mammals in Australian tropical rain forestEcology85(5)1,3171,329
36. Tao F Feng Z 1999 Terrestrialecosystem sensitivity to acid deposition in South ChinaAir, Water, and Soil Pollution62531
37. Wang X K Ouyang Z Y Xiao H 2001 Distribution and division of sensitivityto water-caused soil loss in ChinaActaEcologica Sinica21(1)1419(in Chinese)
38. Wu J G 2000 Landscape Ecology-Pattern, Process, Scale and HierarchyBeijingHigherEducation Press(in Chinese)
39. Xiao D N Bu R C Li X Z 1997 Spatial ecological theory and landscapeheterogeneityActa Ecologica Sinica17(5)453461(in Chinese)
40. Yang H X 1981 Mathematics Classification of Plant EcologyBeijingScience Press(in Chinese)