1 Introduction
2 Geological settings
Fig.1 (a) Major tectonic units of the Junggar Basin (modified from Bian et al., 2010). (b) Cross-section through the Junggar Basin from south to north (modified from Yang, 2009). (c) Structure image of the top of the Jurassic units. |
Fig.2 Stratigraphic names and ages, lithologies, sedimentary environments, and tectonic evolution of the Junggar Basin, China (modified from Hu et al., 2020). |
3 Data and methods
3.1 Reservoir properties
3.2 Fracture characterization
3.3 Carbon and oxygen isotopes
4 Results
4.1 Lithology and reservoir quality
Fig.3 (a) Ternary diagram illustrating the framework compositions of the Upper Jurassic tight sandstones in the Yongjin Oil Field. Q = quartz; F = feldspar; and R = rock fragment. (b) Rock fragment ternary plot of the Upper Jurassic tight sandstones. VRF = volcanic rock fragments; MRF = metamorphic rock fragments; and SRF = sedimentary rock fragments. |
4.2 Diagenesis
Fig.5 Photography of blue epoxy resin-impregnated thin sections illustrates the diagenetic types. (a) Intensive compaction with line contact, Well Y1, 5826.65 m. (b) Line-point contact sandstone with both residual intergranular pores and dissolution pores, Well Y1, 5821 m. (c) Point-contact sandstone with both residual intergranular pores and dissolution pores, Well Y301, 5549 m. (d) Kaolinite and chlorite cements, Well Y1, 5882 m. (e) Quartz overgrowth, Well Y3, 5619 m. (f) Calcite cements after bitumen charging, Well Y6, 6048.59 m. (g) Dolomite cement in pores with partial dissolution, Well Y6, 6028.52 m. (h) Calcite and dolomite cementation showing calcite and dolomite colors of red and purple using alizarin red, respectively. (i) Lithic and feldspar partial dissolution, Well Y1, 5821 m. |
4.3 Fracture characterization
4.3.1 Fracture type and distribution in core observations
Fig.6 Photography of the cores with different fracture types. (a) Bedding-parallel fractures (BPFs) (core discing) in the Qigu Formation, Well Y1. (b) Bedding-parallel fractures (core discing) and vertical fractures in the Qigu Formation, Well Y301. (c) and (d) Bedding-parallel fractures in the Qigu Formation, Well Y2. (e) Bedding parallel fractures (BPFs) in Qigu Formation, Well Y2. (f) High dip-angle fractures in the Qigu Formation, Well Y7. |
4.3.2 BPFs in thin sections
Fig.7 Photography of blue epoxy resin-impregnated thin sections illustrating the bedding-parallel fractures. (a) Bedding-parallel fractures in coarse grains, Qigu Formation, Well Y301, 5549.2 m. Section a1 is magnified to show the pore-filling state of the BPFs. (b) Bedding-parallel fractures in coarse grains, Qigu Formation, Well Y301, 5544.7 m. Section b1 is magnified to show the pore-filling state of the BPFs. (c) Bedding-parallel fractures in coarse grains that pass through quartz overgrowths, Qigu Formation, Well Y1, 5827.7 m. (d) Bedding-parallel fractures in tight rocks. No horizontal displacement, filling, or dissolution in the fracture. Qigu Formation, Well Y3, 5865.6 m. |
4.3.3 Element geochemistry of the BPF surface
Fig.8 Bedding-parallel fracture surface (P1, P3) and fresh surface (P2, P4) element geochemistry analysis using the portable element analyzer. (a), (b), and (c) are the cores used for the element geochemistry analysis and (d) is the element mass content. Ba and S elements are the main difference between BPF surfaces and fresh surfaces. The Ba and S come from the invasion of the oil drilling mud. |
4.3.4 BPFs and reservoir quality
4.3.5 BPFs and faults
Fig.10 Bedding-parallel fracture (BPF) density and high dip-angle fracture (HDA) density with respect to the faults on the top of Jurassic formation. The wells with high BPF density can be either close to faults or far from faults. The HDA fractures are mainly close to the faults. |
4.4 Oxygen and carbon stable isotope geochemistry
5 Discussion
5.1 Timing of the BPFs
Fig.12 Burial history of Well Y1 and the carbonate cementation formation time. Bedding-parallel fractures should have formed after the carbonate cements (Modified from Shi et al. (2009)). |