1 Introduction
Interplanetary body impacts are important geological processes in the Earth’s history and provide essential information about other solar system bodies (
Grieve and Pesonen, 1992). In addition, impact events have likely severely affected the terrestrial environment, such as with the Younger Dryas abrupt cooling event (
Firestone et al., 2007,
Sweatman, 2021), and even biological survival, such as with the well-known mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary (
Schulte et al., 2010). Accurately determining the chronology of these impact events enables us to understand the link between impact events and changes in the biosphere and climate. However, only a few impact events are well dated, especially impact events that have occurred during the Quaternary (
Jourdan et al., 2012,
Schmieder and Kring, 2020).
The Xiuyan impact crater, located in northeast China (Fig.1), is the only officially recognized impact crater in China, according to the Earth Impact Database (available at Earth Impact Database website).
Liu et al. (
2013) reported an age of ~50 thousand years (ka) for crater formation using radiocarbon dating of lacustrine sediments. However, the relatively young upper age limit of < 50 ka and the deposition rate (~1 cm/year) of the lake sediments indicate that the reported ages of the Xiuyan impact event are probably underestimated and that other dating strategies should be used. For example, luminescence dating has been successfully employed to constrain the age of Quaternary sediments to approximately 500 ka (
Jacobs et al., 2018) or even 780 ka (
Rui et al., 2020). Therefore, in this study, both luminescence and radiocarbon dating methods were used to evaluate lake sediments in the Xiuyan impact crater to further constrain the age of the impact event and reconstruct the evolution of this impact crater lake.
Fig.1 (a) Location of the study area. (b) Location of the Xiuyan impact crater (blue star). (c) Topographic map of the Xiuyan impact crater and the coring location (red dot). (d) Photograph of the Xiuyan impact crater taken from a distance; the red dot is the coring site. |
Full size|PPT slide
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study site
The Xiuyan crater (40°22′N, 123°28′E) is a bowl-shaped simple impact crater located in the Liaodong Peninsula in northeast China (Fig.1). The nearly circular crater has a diameter of ~1.8 km and a depth of ~149 m from the impact crater rim to the crater bottom (
Wang et al., 2013). The crater is characterized by a circular rim and has an outlet at its northeastern part. The highest part of the rim is located in the southwestern part of the crater and has an altitude of ~344 m above sea level, and the lowest point lies at the outlet and an altitude of ~120 m (Fig.1(c)) (
Wang et al., 2013). The crater is located in Proterozoic metamorphic rocks, i.e., granulite, hornblendite, gneiss, marble, and tremolite marble (
Chen et al., 2009). The crater is filled with breccia consisting of granulite, hornblendite, gneiss, and tremolite marble at depths ranging from ~295 m to ~107 m beneath the ground. The breccia layer is overlain by ~107-m-thick Quaternary lake sediments (Fig.2) (
Chen et al., 2009). Currently, the crater is dry and is used for crop cultivation.
Fig.2 Lithology, sampling information, total organic carbon (TOC), and representative lithological pictures of the core. |
Full size|PPT slide
2.2 Borehole description and sampling
Two parallel cores with depths of 100.0 m (Xiuyan-A) and 103.8 m (Xiuyan-B) were recovered from the center of the Xiuyan crater in April 2020. The Xiuyan cores are predominantly composed of fine green grayish to dark silt and silty clays, occasionally intercalated with siderite layers, gravel layers, and peat (Fig.2). Specifically, disordered silt laminations with white and dark thin sand layers occur in the deepest part of the core (~105–100 m). Above 100 m, a thick layer of fine green grayish to dark silt and silty clay is observed, with sporadic laminations between ~100 and ~23 m. Additionally, an ~3.4-m-thick peat layer (11.9–8.5 m) with abundant wood fragments and organic detritus is present. Subsequently, the sediments consist of steel gray and grayish-white sandy silt layers and gravel layers in the uppermost part of the core (Fig.2).
Five residual plant samples (stems and leaves of terrestrial plants) for radiocarbon dating were collected from ~15.2 m to 7.0 m deep in the core (Fig.2). A total of 24 luminescence samples were collected from the sediment core, ranging from the top (~1.7 m) to the bottom (~99.1 m) of core A. Each luminescence sample measuring 15 cm in length was obtained from the bottom section of the core. The samples were sealed in a black plastic tube and wrapped in aluminum foil to avoid moisture loss and light exposure.
2.3 Radiocarbon dating
The
14C samples were pretreated and analyzed at the Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory (Florida, USA) and converted into calendar years using the online OxCal V4.4.4 software (
Ramsey, 2009) and the IntCal20 calibration curve (
Reimer et al., 2020). The calibrated
14C age in units of ka (the
14C age represents the age before 1950 CE) was used for comparison with the luminescence ages.
2.4 Luminescence dating
2.4.1 Sample preparation and measurements
Sample preparation for luminescence dating was conducted under subdued red light in the laboratory following standard luminescence dating laboratory procedures at the University of Hong Kong, China. The outer 2–3 cm of deposits on the sample surface were removed and reserved for radioactive isotope (e.g., U, Th, and K) measurements. The remaining inner part of the sample was prepared for equivalent dose (De) determination. Then, 10% hydrochloric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide solutions were used to remove the carbonates and organic matter, respectively. The coarse-grain fractions with diameters ranging from 63 to 90, 90–125, and 90–150 μm (depending on availability) were obtained by wet sieving. Potassium feldspar (K-feldspar) grains were then extracted using heavy liquids, with a density range of 2.52–2.58 g/cm3. After drying, the K-feldspar grains were etched with 10% HF for ~10 min to remove the outer layer irradiated by alpha particles. The etched grains were then treated with 10% hydrochloric acid for ~10 min to remove any acid-soluble fluoride precipitates. The etched K-feldspar grains were then mounted on 9.7-mm stainless steel discs (3–4 mm in diameter), with silicone oil as an adhesive.
Luminescence measurements were carried out on an automated Risø TL/OSL DA-15 Reader equipped with a
90Sr/
90Y beta source (0.07 Gy/s on stainless steel discs) (
Bøtter-Jensen et al. 2010). Infrared LEDs (875 ± 40 nm) were utilized for K-feldspar stimulation. Luminescence signals were detected by a photomultiplier tube through a filter pack comprising Schott BG-39 and Corning 7-59 filters. Additionally, the samples were bleached using a solar simulator (Hönle SOL2) with a 1000 W xenon arc lamp.
2.4.2 Standardized growth curve (SGC) method
Considering the potential older ages (e.g., > 50 ka) of the core sediments, the ‘multiple aliquot regenerative-dose (MAR) with ‘heat’ protocol using multiple-elevated-temperature (MET) post infrared infrared (pIRIR) signals of K-feldspar was employed (Tab.1) (
Li and Li, 2011;
Li et al., 2013;
Chen et al., 2015;
Zhang et al., 2021,
2022). In this protocol, all aliquots were preheated at 320°C for 60 s and then stimulated with IR light at 50°C, 100°C, 150°C, 200°C, 250°C, and 300°C for 100 s (Tab.1). Before the test dose, all aliquots were heated to 500°C to eliminate the ‘pre-dose memory’, increasing the average D
0 value to ~750 Gy (
Li et al., 2013;
Chen et al., 2015;
Zhang et al., 2022). The MET-pIRIR signals at higher temperatures (e.g., 250°C and 300°C) were likely free of anomalous fading; thus, no fading correction was required (
Li and Li, 2011and 2012). Fig.3 shows the IRSL and pIRIR decay curves for one aliquot of sample A01-A. The first 10 s of the decay curve of the IRSL and pIRIR signals were used for
De calculations, with the last 10 s signal treated as background and subtracted.
Step | Treatment | Observed |
1 | Give regenerative dose, Di | |
2 | Preheat at 320°C for 60 s | |
3 | Take IRSL measurement at 50°C for 100 s | Lx(50) |
4 | Take IRSL measurement at 100°C for 100 s | Lx(100) |
5 | Take IRSL measurement at 150°C for 100 s | Lx(150) |
6 | Take IRSL measurement at 200°C for 100 s | Lx(200) |
7 | Take IRSL measurement at 250°C for 100 s | Lx(250) |
8 | Take IRSL measurement at 300°C for 100 s | Lx(300) |
9 | Cutheat to 500°C | |
10 | Give test dose, Dt | |
11 | Preheat at 320°C for 60 s | |
12 | Take IRSL measurement at 50°C for 100 s | Tx(50) |
13 | Take IRSL measurement at 100°C for 100 s | Tx(100) |
14 | Take IRSL measurement at 150°C for 100 s | Tx(150) |
15 | Take IRSL measurement at 200°C for 100 s | Tx(200) |
16 | Take IRSL measurement at 250°C for 100 s | Tx(250) |
17 | Take IRSL measurement at 300°C for 100 s | Tx(300) |
Fig.3 Natural and test dose decay curves of K-feldspar IRSL and MET-pIRIR signals for an aliquot from sample A01-A. |
Full size|PPT slide
A total of 11 samples collected from various depths of the sediment borehole were measured to establish a ‘MAR SGC’ curve using the ‘MAR with heat’ protocol, with the ‘regenerative-dose normalization’ method (Tab.1). The protocol for K-feldspar is based on the establishment of an SGC curve constructed from the renormalized
Lx/
Tx signals of multiple aliquot groups (
Li et al., 2013;
Li et al., 2017). The detailed steps are shown below.
1) The aliquots from 11 samples were bleached using a solar simulator for ~8 h.
2) These bleached aliquots were divided into several groups and given different regenerative doses ranging from 0 to 3000 Gy (Fig.4). The test doses were fixed at 210 Gy. Among them, one group of aliquots for each sample was given a regenerative dose of ~600 Gy for ‘regenerative-dose normalization’.
Fig.4 Establishment of the SGC with the ‘MAR with heat’ protocol based on 11 K-feldspar samples. The renormalization dose was ~600 Gy. The renormalized Lx/Tx shown in (a)–(f) are for IR stimulation temperatures of 50°C, 100°C, 150°C, 200°C, 250°C, and 300°C, respectively. The renormalized Lx/Tx data were fitted using a single saturating exponential (SSE) function: y = y0 + A*(1–exp(–x/D0)). |
Full size|PPT slide
3) For each sample, the sensitivity-corrected luminescence signal (Lx/Tx) of all the aliquots was normalized to the mean Lx/Tx value of the aliquots dosed with 600 Gy. The test doses of all MAR measurements remained fixed at 210 Gy.
4) The renormalized Lx/Tx values of all aliquots were plotted against their corresponding regenerative doses and fitted by using a single saturating exponential function (Fig.4). For example, the MAR SGC of the MET-pIRIR300 signal can be well fitted using the function y = 0.041 + 4.682×(1–exp(–x/989)), where y is the renormalized Lx/Tx and x is the dose. The D0 value of the MET-pIRIR300 signal is 989 Gy. The MAR SGC of the IRSL and MET-pIRIR signals at 50°C, 100°C, 150°C, 200°C, 250°C, and 300°C are shown in Fig.4.
The established MAR SGC was used to determine the De values. The natural signal (Ln/Tn) and the signal of a regenerative dose (Lr/Tr) were measured. Aliquots of the latter were bleached for 8 h before being given regenerative doses that closely approximated the expected De values. The median values (Lr/Tr) were used to renormalize the Ln/Tn values. The renormalized Ln/Tn values were then projected onto the MAR SGC to estimate the De values using the following equation:
where f(De) and f(Dr) are the corresponding functional values of De and Dr in the MAR SGC.
For the dose recovery test, heating the sample to 500°C (Tab.1) in the MAR protocol removed the influence of the pre-dose, and the test dose signals were used only for normalization between aliquots. The test dose size had no impact on the MAR
De estimation (
Zhang et al. 2021,
Zhang et al. 2022). Therefore, no dose recovery tests were conducted for the MAR protocol study, as suggested by
Zhang et al. (2022).
2.4.3 Residual dose measurements
The residual dose caused by the unbleachable component of the MET-pIRIR signals may influence the final De results. Three samples (A01-A, 24, and 35) were selected to determine the residual doses. Three groups of two aliquots for each sample were solar bleached for 2, 4, and 8 h and then measured using the MET-pIRIR procedure. The obtained De values are plotted against bleaching time and stimulation temperature (Fig.5).
Fig.5 Residual dose test for three samples. (a) Residual doses after eight hours of solar bleaching for different IRSL and MET-pIRIR signals. (b) Residual doses of MET-pIRIR300 signals after two, four, and eight hours of solar bleaching. |
Full size|PPT slide
2.4.4 Fading test
To assess the possibility of anomalous fading for the MET-pIRIR signals of the old samples, eight samples were selected. Nine aliquots from each sample were measured using a single-aliquot fading test procedure similar to that described by
Auclair et al. (2003) but based on the MET-pIRIR procedure (Tab.1). Each aliquot was given a dose of 1000 Gy and then preheated and stored for periods of up to approximately two months in the dark at room temperature.
2.4.5 Environmental dose rate
The concentrations of these radioactive elements were obtained using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) instrument for U and Th and an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP‒OES) instrument for K. The internal K and Rb concentrations of K-feldspar were assumed to be 13 ± 1% and 400 ± 100 ppm, respectively (
Huntley and Baril 1997,
Zhao and Li 2005). The contribution of cosmic rays to the dose rate was estimated for each sample as a function of the density of cover deposits, depth, altitude, and geomagnetic latitude (
Prescott and Hutton 1994). However, the contribution of cosmic rays to the dose rate can be considered negligible when the depth of the overlying sediments is greater than ~30 m.
Estimating the water content in the sediments remains challenging, as the compression caused by increasing overlying sediment deposition can lead to changes in the water content over the burial history, particularly in the organic layer. However, for incompressible materials, such as sand and silt, measurements of the water content in the laboratory indicate limited changes (
Roberts et al., 2021). In this study, we used the current water content as a reference for the average long-term water content. An error of 10% was applied to account for any likely variations over the burial history.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Radiocarbon ages
The results of radiocarbon dating are presented in Tab.2. All five radiocarbon ages are older than 43.5 ka BP, which is considered beyond the upper limit of radiocarbon dating.
Tab.2 AMS 14C dating results for the five samples. The radiocarbon ages were calibrated by BetaCal4.20 and IntCal20 (Reimer et al., 2020). The ages are expressed in years before present (BP), where ‘present’ is defined as 1950 AD. |
Sample ID | Depth/m | Materials | Conventional 14C age (a BP) | Calibrated 14C age (cal a BP) |
B05-70 | 6.26 | Plant | > 43500 BP | Older than cal BC 44650 (cal BP 46600) |
B06-78 | 8.60 | Plant | > 43500 BP | Older than cal BC 44650 (cal BP 46600) |
B06-200 | 9.82 | Plant | > 43500 BP | Older than cal BC 44650 (cal BP 46600) |
B06-144 | 9.26 | Plant | > 43500 BP | Older than cal BC 44650 (cal BP 46600) |
B10-77 | 14.50 | Plant | > 43500 BP | Older than cal BC 44650 (cal BP 46600) |
3.2 K-feldspar pIRIR ages
3.2.1 Characteristics of the IRSL and pIRIR signals
Fig.5 shows the residual doses of the MET-pIRIR300 signals of three representative samples (A01-A, 24, and 35). The results indicate that the residual doses reached an unbleachable level after two hours of solar bleaching, with values ranging from 17 Gy to 25 Gy. Because the residual dose is negligible compared to the large natural De value (> 1200 Gy), no residual dose was subtracted in this study.
Fig.6 shows the
g values (
tc normalized to 2 days) for the MET-pIRIR
300 signals for eight samples. The g values are consistently zero (−0.9%–3.4%/decade) within the uncertainty ranges, even for the samples collected near the bottom of the borehole. The
g values decrease as the stimulation temperature increases (Fig. S1). The results suggest that the MET-pIRIR procedure can isolate less-fading or nonfading signals from our samples (
Li and Li, 2011).
Fig.6 Fading rate measurements of the MET-pIRIR300 signals of eight samples. The tc is 1.96 h. |
Full size|PPT slide
The pIRIR
300De distributions are shown in Fig.7 and S2. The overdispersion (
OD) value is applied to describe the
De distribution. The majority of samples (18 out of 24) have
OD values less than 20% (Fig.7 and S2), indicating that the
De values are mainly centered on the average value (
Galbraith and Roberts, 2012). The characteristic dose (
D0) of the pIRIR
300 signal is ~964 Gy. In conjunction with the stratigraphic order, the pIRIR
300 signals appear to be saturated for samples collected at depths below ~37 m (sample A18) if the upper dating limit is defined by 2
D0 for single-saturating exponential growth (
Wintle and Murray, 2006). Therefore, the larger
OD values of the saturated samples (Fig. S2) are still acceptable, and the final
De value was calculated using the central age model (CAM). For the saturated samples, the calculated
De values should be regarded only as the minimum
De values.
Fig.7 Distribution of De values of MET-pIRIR300 signals for four unsaturated samples. N represents the number of aliquots for the SGC De calculation. |
Full size|PPT slide
3.2.2 De vs. temperature (De-T) plots
The De-T plots demonstrate an increasing trend with increasing stimulation temperature (Fig.8), as smaller fading rates of pIRIR signals occur at higher temperatures. Some samples (e.g., A01-A, A01-B, A05, and A07) show consistent De values for pIRIR signals at higher stimulated temperatures, indicating the presence of a De-T plateau (Fig.8). This suggests that these high-temperature signals are less affected by anomalous fading and that no fading correction is needed.
Fig.8 De values plotted against different IR stimulation temperatures with the MET-pIRIR protocol for four unsaturated samples. Red diamonds indicate the average De values. |
Full size|PPT slide
In contrast, for some samples (e.g., A18, A25, A35, A44, and A46), the De values increase from 250°C to 300°C (Figs. S3 and S4), making it difficult to determine whether the pIRIR300 signals are sufficiently stable. However, the g values indicate negligible fading of the pIRIR300 signals (Fig.6). On the other hand, the pIRIR300 signals appear to be saturated for samples collected at deeper locations (e.g., sample A44), which likely explains the absence of a De-T plateau.
3.2.3 Reliability of ages and implications for the timing of impact events
Two near-surface replicate samples, i.e., A01-A and A01-B, yield luminescence ages of 331 ± 30 and 334 ± 30 ka, respectively (Tab.3), which are significantly older than the radiocarbon ages. Considering the upper limit of radiocarbon dating, the radiocarbon ages would be underestimated. However, the MAR MET-pIRIR method using K-feldspar extends the upper limit of luminescence dating to approximately 350 ka and even up to 780 ka for dating loess-paleosol sequences on the Loess Plateau (
Chen et al. 2015;
Rui et al. 2020;
Zhang et al. 2022). This suggests the reliability of the dating results for samples A01-A and A01-B.
Tab.3 Sample depths, dosimetry data, MET-pIRIR300 De values, MET-pIRIR300 ages, and associated errors (1σ) for all samples. |
Sample ID | Depth/m1 | Grain size/µm | U/ppm | Th/ppm | K/% | Water content/% | Dose rate Gy/ka2 | Number of aliquots | De/Gy | Age/ka3 |
A01-A | 1.7 | 90-125 | 3.22 ± 0.31 | 14.12 ± 1.34 | 2.64 ± 0.25 | 5 ± 10 | 4.66 ± 0.40 | 51 | 1539 ± 41 | 331 ± 30 |
A01-B | 1.8 | 90-125 | 2.85 ± 0.27 | 15.14 ± 1.44 | 2.20 ± 0.21 | 3 ± 10 | 4.31 ± 0.37 | 61 | 1438 ± 32 | 334 ± 30 |
A05 | 9.8 | 63-90 | 2.80 ± 0.27 | 13.62 ± 1.29 | 1.57 ± 0.15 | 103 ± 10 | 1.77 ± 0.10 | 9 | 1284 ± 71 | 727 ± 57 |
A07 | 14.8 | 90-125 | 4.36 ± 0.41 | 15.59 ± 1.48 | 2.47 ± 0.23 | 55 ± 10 | 3.18 ± 0.20 | 47 | 1434 ± 31 | 451 ± 30 |
A09 | 19.4 | 63-90 | 4.91 ± 0.47 | 14.82 ± 1.41 | 2.49 ± 0.28 | 41 ± 10 | 3.46 ± 0.26 | 21 | 1986 ± 72 | 574 ± 47 |
A11 | 24.5 | 63-90 | 3.81 ± 0.36 | 16.55 ± 1.57 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 53 ± 10 | 3.12 ± 0.21 | 48 | 1484 ± 46 | 476 ± 35 |
A14 | 30.7 | 63-90 | 3.72 ± 0.35 | 16.66 ± 1.58 | 2.68 ± 0.25 | 50 ± 10 | 3.26 ± 0.22 | 33 | 1918 ± 107 | 588 ± 52 |
A16 | 33.0 | 63-90 | 4.29 ± 0.41 | 18.03 ± 1.71 | 2.19 ± 0.21 | 70 ± 10 | 2.72 ± 0.17 | 23 | 2008 ± 94 | 737 ± 57 |
A18 | 37.0 | 90-125 | 3.30 ± 0.31 | 15.97 ± 1.52 | 2.16 ± 0.21 | 38 ± 10 | 3.17 ± 0.22 | 28 | 1808 ± 51 | 570 ± 43 |
A22 | 42.5 | 63-90 | 1.87 ± 0.18 | 9.83 ± 0.93 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | 52 ± 10 | 1.76 ± 0.12 | 26 | 2024 ± 115 | 1149 ± 100 |
A23 | 45.1 | 63-90 | 3.23 ± 0.31 | 16.47 ± 1.56 | 2.44 ± 0.28 | 56 ± 10 | 2.89 ± 0.21 | 26 | 2161 ± 61 | 747 ± 57 |
A24 | 47.3 | 90-125 | 3.13 ± 0.30 | 16.41 ± 1.56 | 2.54 ± 0.24 | 37 ± 10 | 3.43 ± 0.24 | 39 | 1646 ± 59 | 480 ± 38 |
A25 | 50.1 | 63-90 | 2.83 ± 0.27 | 13.83 ± 1.31 | 2.39 ± 0.27 | 40 ± 10 | 3.01 ± 0.23 | 23 | 2435 ± 121 | 808 ± 74 |
A26 | 51.9 | 63-90 | 3.40 ± 0.32 | 16.03 ± 1.52 | 2.57 ± 0.24 | 41 ± 10 | 3.29 ± 0.23 | 21 | 2184 ± 81 | 664 ± 53 |
A28 | 55.5 | 90-125 | 3.25 ± 0.31 | 15.63 ± 1.48 | 2.48 ± 0.24 | 32 ± 10 | 3.51 ± 0.26 | 26 | 1594 ± 62 | 454 ± 38 |
A31 | 61.3 | 90-125 | 3.69 ± 0.35 | 17.33 ± 1.65 | 2.60 ± 0.25 | 38 ± 10 | 3.58 ± 0.25 | 28 | 1859 ± 50 | 519 ± 39 |
A33 | 66.3 | 63-90 | 3.64 ± 0.35 | 17.56 ± 1.67 | 2.22 ± 0.21 | 42 ± 10 | 3.15 ± 0.22 | 24 | 1973 ± 84 | 626 ± 51 |
A35 | 71.6 | 90-150 | 3.41 ± 0.32 | 18.08 ± 1.72 | 2.26 ± 0.22 | 49 ± 10 | 3.12 ± 0.22 | 39 | 1596 ± 60 | 511 ± 41 |
A37 | 76.8 | 90-125 | 3.68 ± 0.35 | 17.66 ± 1.68 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 34 ± 10 | 3.66 ± 0.26 | 20 | 2047 ± 74 | 559 ± 45 |
A39 | 82.0 | 90-150 | 2.90 ± 0.28 | 12.95 ± 1.23 | 1.88 ± 0.18 | 32 ± 10 | 2.90 ± 0.22 | 13 | 2329 ± 145 | 802 ± 79 |
A42 | 87.6 | 90-125 | 3.96 ± 0.38 | 17.84 ± 1.70 | 2.54 ± 0.24 | 42 ± 10 | 3.49 ± 0.24 | 22 | 1337 ± 150 | 383 ± 50 |
A44 | 91.1 | 90-150 | 4.17 ± 0.40 | 16.69 ± 1.59 | 2.64 ± 0.25 | 37 ± 10 | 3.71 ± 0.27 | 30 | 2072 ± 80 | 559 ± 46 |
A46 | 96.1 | 90-150 | 5.09 ± 0.48 | 17.13 ± 1.63 | 2.72 ± 0.26 | 35 ± 10 | 4.01 ± 0.30 | 41 | 1787 ± 61 | 445 ± 36 |
A48 | 99.1 | 90-125 | 4.48 ± 0.43 | 8.59 ± 0.82 | 1.60 ± 0.15 | 11 ± 10 | 3.24 ± 0.26 | 70 | 1212 ± 49 | 374 ± 34 |
The pIRIR300 ages increase from sample A01-A (331 ± 30 ka) to sample A18 (570 ± 43 ka) within the age range (Fig.9 and Tab.3). However, there are two unexpected older ages for samples A05 (727 ± 57 ka) and A16 (737 ± 57 ka). For sample A05, which was obtained from the organic peat layer (Fig.1(c)), the dose rate (1.77 ± 0.10 Gy/ka) is significantly lower than the average values of the other silty and sandy samples (3–5 Gy/ka) (Fig.9 and Tab.3). Similarly, the dose rate of sample A16 (2.72 ± 0.17 Gy/ka) is lower than the mean dose rate (Fig.9). On the other hand, sample A22 consists of siderite layers, yielding lower U, Th, and K contents; therefore, the dose rate of sample A22 is also markedly lower than that of the other samples (Fig.9). Therefore, the much lower dose rates related to the different sedimentary conditions are the main reasons for the extremely old age results. Based on the pIRIR300 ages of samples with depths up to ~37 m, the mean sedimentation rate is approximately 0.111 ± 0.018 mm/year.
Fig.9 Sample depths; concentrations of U, Th, and K; MET-pIRIR300 De values; and MET-pIRIR300 ages for all samples. The 2D0 value (empirical upper dating limit) is ~1928 Gy. The ages start to be underestimated for samples collected below ~37 m in the core. The gray bars indicate three samples with anomalous concentrations of U, Th, and K; dose rates; and dating ages compared to the average values. In the age-depth model, blue triangles are the ages (above a depth of 37 m in the core) used for modeling, while gray and red circles are ages not used for modeling. The blue diamond indicates the modeling result of 1201 ± 133 ka. |
Full size|PPT slide
The measured pIRIR300 ages of the samples collected at depths below ~37 m and their De values are larger than those in the 2D0 range, and the ages are relatively scattered within the range of 374–1149 ka (Tab.3), which may exceed the upper dating limit for K-feldspar pIRIR signals. However, in practice, defining this upper limit of reliability can be difficult because it varies according to the specific luminescence signal used, the dose rate, and individual samples. Considering the saturation dose of the pIRIR300 signal (2D0, ~1928 Gy) and stratigraphic order, the pIRIR300 signals saturate in samples collected at depths below ~37 m (sample A18). Given the same sedimentation rate based on the upper luminescence ages (0.111 ± 0.018 mm/year), it is suggested that the Xiuyan impact event occurred at ~1201 ± 133 ka.
3.3 Evolution of the Xiuyan impact crater lake
Based on the geochronological, sedimentological, and geomorphological investigations, we then established the evolution of the Xiuyan impact crater lake. First, an ~55 m-diameter aero siderite or ~115 m-diameter aerolite (
Wang et al., 2013) struck the Earth at ~1201 ± 133 ka and created the ~1800 m-diameter Xiuyan impact crater in the Liaodong Peninsula in northeast China (Fig.10(a)). In the impact crater, a lake eventually formed under the influence of groundwater flow and precipitation (Fig.10(b)). In the initial stage, the lake was shallow, and the hydrological conditions were unstable, which was revealed by the disordered silt laminations with white and dark sand layers from ~105–100 m (Fig.2). As more water accumulated, the Xiuyan impact crater lake became deeper (Fig.10(c)). In this stage (~100–23 m), the deposited lake sediments are characterized by gray silty clays, occasional thin dark sand layers, and gray siderite and oligonite-rich interlayers (Fig.2). In addition, submillimeter- to millimeter-scale laminations are universal but discontinuous within this interval of ~100–23 m, and the total organic carbon content is lower than 5%, which is similar to that of volcanic lakes during glacial periods (
Liu et al., 2010,
2015). When the lake level increased to a level beyond that of the crater rim, overflow naturally occurred via the north-eastern breach (Fig.1(c) and Fig.10(d)). Subsequently, the lake became shallower, as indicated by the disappearance of the submillimeter- to millimeter-scale laminations, and the TOC contents increased from ~23.0 m to ~11.9 m (Fig.2). The lake then turned into a peat bog, characterized by abundant wood fragments and organic detritus (TOC contents of ~5%–20%) from ~11.9 m to ~8.5 m (Fig.2). Afterward, alluvial deposits, which consisted of steel gray and grayish-white sandy silt with gravels (Fig.2), were deposited in the crater until it was filled with sediments (Fig.10(d)).
Fig.10 Sketch showing the evolution of Xiuyan crater lake. (a) The crater was created by a terrestrial impact. (b) Water and surrounding materials rapidly filled the crater, forming a crater lake. (c) The crater lake was filled mainly with water and partially with lake sediments characterized by gray silty clays and submillimeter- to millimeter-scale laminations under deep-water conditions. (d) As the lake level increased to a level beyond that of the crater rim, overflow naturally occurred. Eventually, when the crater became filled with sediments, no further materials were deposited. |
Full size|PPT slide
4 Conclusions
In this study, we present further geochronological constraints on the formation of the Xiuyan impact crater in northeast China by determining the ages of lake sediments using luminescence and radiocarbon dating methods. The results show that all the radiocarbon ages of the lake sediments exceed the upper dating limit, and the luminescence ages saturate below a depth of ~37 m. The results of the age-depth model show that the Xiuyan impact event occurred at approximately 1201 ± 133 ka, which is much older than the previously reported limited AMS radiocarbon age of ~50 ka BP. By incorporating sedimentological, geomorphological, and geochronological analyses, the evolutionary history of the Xiuyan impact crater lake was reconstructed. We propose that the crater lake underwent the stages of initial formation, subsequent filling with water and sediment, overflow, and eventual disappearance at ~331-334 ka. Further geochronological investigations are needed to precisely constrain the timing of the impact event.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}