A new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity: fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve

Abstract

Pressure mercury intrusion test is (MIP) one of the most commonly used methods to characterize pore-fracture structure. Here, we use the fractal dimension of the mercury intrusion curve to analyze the heterogeneity of pore and fracture distribution. Differing from the intrusive mercury curve, the extrusive curve provides a better representation of the seepage capacity of a reservoir. In this paper, the division method of sample types using both mercury invasive parameters (pore volume, pore volume percentage, porosity, permeability) and extrusive parameters (mercury removal efficiency) is discussed. The fractal dimension values of mercury intrusive and extrusive curves are calculated for all samples using the Menger, Thermodynamics, and Multifractal fractal models. Moreover, the fractal significance of the mercury withdrawal curve is examined. The results are as follows. 1) The samples can be divided into three types based on the mercury removal efficiency and total pore volume. Type A is characterized by lower total pore volume (< 0.08 cm³·g⁻¹) and removal efficiency (< 30%), type B has lower total pore volume (< 0.08 cm³·g⁻¹) and higher removal efficiency (> 30%), and type C has larger total pore volume (> 0.08 cm³·g⁻¹) and higher removal efficiency(> 30%). 2) Mercury removal efficiency does not correlate with the mineral composition or total pore volume, but it does show a clear positive correlation with pore volume in the range of 100 to 1000 nm. Unlike the Menger model, the mercury removal curve analyzed using the thermodynamics and multifractal model shows good fractal characteristics. 3) In contrast to the injective curves, the fractal dimension of mercury removal curves exhibits an obvious linear negative correlation with pore structure parameters and mercury removal efficiency. Moreover, the multifractal dimensions D₀–D₁₀ obtained from the mercury removal curves show a negative correlation with porosity and permeability. This indicates that fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve can be used as a new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

pore-fracture structure / mercury extrusion curve / pore structure / porosity / permeability

References

[1] Cai Y, Li Q, Liu D (2018). Insights into matrix compressibility of coals by mercury intrusion porosimetry and N₂ adsorption.Int J Coal Geol, 200: 199–212

[2] Cai Y, Liu D, Pan Z (2016). Investigating the effects of seepage-pores and fractures on coal permeability by fractal analysis.Transp Porous Media, 111(2): 479–497

[3] Guo X, Yao Y, Liu D (2014). Characteristics of coal matrix compressibility: an investigation by mercury intrusion porosimetry.Energy Fuels, 28(6): 3673–3678

[4] He D F, Li D S, Zhang G W (2011). Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin, China.Chinese J Geo, 46(3): 589–606

[5] Hou H H, Shao L Y, Tang Y, Li Y N, Liang G D, Xin Y L, Zhang J Q (2023). Coal seam correlation in terrestrial basins by sequence stratigraphy and its implications for palaeoclimate and palaeoenvironment evolution.J Earth Sci, 34(2): 1–15

[6] Hou H H, Shao L Y, Tang Y, Zhao S, Yuan Y, Li Y N, Mu G Y, Zhou Y, Liang G D, Zhang J Q (2020). Quantitative characterization of low-rank coal reservoirs in the southern Junggar Basin, NW China: implications for pore structure evolution around the first coalification jump.Mar Pet Geol, 113: 104165

[7] Hu Y, Guo Y, Shangguan J (2020). Fractal characteristics and model applicability for pores in tight gas sandstone reservoirs: a case study of the Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin.Energy Fuels, 34(12): 16059–16072

[8] Knackstedt M A, Sahimi M, Roberts G W (1996). Fractal analysis of capillary pressure curves in reservoir rocks.Transport Porous Media, 24: 2–14

[9] Lai J, Wang G, Wang Z (2018). A review on pore structure characterization in tight sandstones.Earth Sci Rev, 177: 436–457

[10] Li Y, Yang J, Pan Z, Tong W (2020). Nanoscale pore structure and mechanical property analysis of coal: an insight combining AFM and SEM images.Fuel, 260: 116352

[11] Peng C, Zou C, Yang Y, Zhang G, Wang W (2017). Fractal analysis of high rank coal from southeast Qinshui basin by using gas adsorption and mercury porosimetry.J Petrol Sci Eng, 156: 235–249

[12] Schmitt M, Fernandes C P, Da Cunha Neto J A B, Wolf F G, Dos Santos V S S (2013). Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using nitrogen gas adsorption combined with mercury injection capillary pressure techniques.Mar Pet Geol, 39(1): 138–149

[13] Song Y, Jiang B, Li F L, Yan G Y, Yao Y P (2018). Applicability of fractal models and nano-pore’s fractal characteristics for low middle rank tectonic deformed coals.Earth Sci, 43(5): 1611–1622

[14] Su P H, Xia Z H, Qu L C, Yu W, Wang P, Li D W, Kong X W (2018). Fractal characteristics of low-permeability gas sandstones based on a new model for mercury intrusion porosimetry.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 60: 246–255

[15] Wang Z, Fu X, Pan J, Deng Z (2023). Effect of N₂/CO₂ injection and alternate injection on volume swelling/shrinkage strain of coal.Energy, 275: 127377

[16] Zhang B, Liu W, Liu X (2006). Scale-dependent nature of the surface fractal dimension for bi- and multi-disperse porous solids by mercury porosimetry.Appl Surf Sci, (253): 1349–1355

[17] Zhang F, Liu S W, Li Q G, Wang Z Q, Han Y G, Yang K, Wu F H (2009). LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb geochronology and geological significance of Xiba granitoids from Qinling, central China.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensisl, 45(5): 832–838

[18] Zhang J J, Chu X X, Wei C T, Zhang P F, Zou M J, Wang M J, Quan F K, Ju W (2022a). Review on the application of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology in coalbed methane production simulation.ACS Omega, 7(30): 26298–26307

[19] Zhang J J, Hu Q H, Chang X C, Qin Z Y, Zhang X Y, Marsh S, Grebby S, Agarwal V (2022b). Water saturation and distribution variation in coal reservoirs: intrusion and drainage experiments using one- and two-dimensional NMR techniques.Energy Fuels, 36(12): 6130–6143

[20] Zhang J J, Qin Z Y, Han Y N, Wang H M, Hou M G, Yan G Y, Feng G J, Zhang X Y, Yin T T, Zhang H N, Wen S P (2022c). Pore-fracture distribution heterogeneity of shale reservoirs determined by using HPMI and LPN2 GA tests.Acta Geol Sin Eng Ed, 96(5): 1659–1672

[21] Zhang P, Lu S, Li J, Chang X (2020). 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation behaviors of protons in clay, kerogen and oil-bearing shale rocks.Mar Pet Geol, 114: 104210

[22] Zhao C J, Jiang Y L, Liu J D (2022). Occurrence and origin of chlorite and associated impact on tight sandstone reservoir quality: a case study of the Xujiahe Formation (NE Sichuan Basin, China).J Petrol Sci Eng, 209: 109859

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Research Fund of Shandong Coalfield Geological Bureau (No. 2022-003).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press