Empirical prediction of hydraulic aperture of 2D rough fractures: a systematic numerical study

Abstract

This study aims to propose an empirical prediction model of hydraulic aperture of 2D rough fractures through numerical simulations by considering the influences of fracture length, average mechanical aperture, minimum mechanical aperture, joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and hydraulic gradient. We generate 600 numerical models using successive random additions (SRA) algorithm and for each model, seven hydraulic gradients spanning from 2.5 × 10⁻⁷ to 1 are considered to fully cover both linear and nonlinear flow regimes. As a result, a total of 4200 fluid flow cases are simulated, which can provide sufficient data for the prediction of hydraulic aperture. The results show that as the ratio of average mechanical aperture to fracture length increases from 0.01 to 0.2, the hydraulic aperture increases following logarithm functions. As the hydraulic gradient increases from 2.5 × 10⁻⁷ to 1, the hydraulic aperture decreases following logarithm functions. When a relatively low hydraulic gradient (i.e., 5 × 10⁻⁷) is applied between the inlet and the outlet boundaries, the streamlines are of parallel distribution within the fractures. However, when a relatively large hydraulic gradient (i.e., 0.5) is applied between the inlet and the outlet boundaries, the streamlines are disturbed and a number of eddies are formed. The hydraulic aperture predicted using the proposed empirical functions agree well with the calculated results and is more reliable than those available in the preceding literature. In practice, the hydraulic aperture can be calculated as a first-order estimation using the proposed prediction model when the associated parameters are given.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

fluid flow / rough fracture surface / mechanical aperture / hydraulic aperture / predictive model

References

[1] Amadei B, Illangasekare T (1992). Analytical solutions for steady and transient flow in non-homogeneous and anisotropic rock joints.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 29(6): 561–572

[2] Awual M R, Yaita T, Kobayashi T, Shiwaku H, Suzuki S (2020). Improving cesium removal to clean-up the contaminated water using modified conjugate material.J Environ Chem Eng, 8(2): 103684

[3] Babadagli T, Ren X, Develi K (2015). Effects of fractal surface roughness and lithology on single and multiphase flow in a single fracture: an experimental investigation.Int J Multiph Flow, 68: 40–58

[4] Barton N (1974). Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints.Eng Geol, 11(11): 287–332

[5] Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985). Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 22(3): 121–140

[6] Barton N, Choubey V (1977). The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.Rock Mech, 10(1–2): 1–54

[7] Bisdom K, Bertotti G, Nick H M (2016). The impact of in-situ stress and outcrop-based fracture geometry on hydraulic aperture and upscaled permeability in fractured reservoirs.Tectonophysics, 690: 63–75

[8] Brown E (1981). Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods.Biospectroscopy, 18(6): 109

[9] Brown S R, Scholz C H (1985). Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces.J Geophys Res, 90(B14): 12575–12582

[10] Cao C, Xu Z, Chai J, Li Y (2019). Radial fluid flow regime in a single fracture under high hydraulic pressure during shear process.J Hydrol (Amst), 579: 124142

[11] Cardona A, Finkbeiner T, Santamarina J C (2021). Natural rock fractures: from aperture to fluid flow.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 54(11): 5827–5844

[12] Chen Y D, Liang W G, Lian H J, Yang J F, Nguyen V P (2017). Experimental study on the effect of fracture geometric characteristics on the permeability in deformable rough-walled fractures.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 98: 121–140

[13] Chen Y F, Zhou J Q, Hu S H, Hu R, Zhou C B (2015). Evaluation of forchheimer equation coefficients for non-darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures.J Hydrol (Amst), 529: 993–1006

[14] Cruz P, Quadros E, Fo D, Marrano A (1982). Evaluation of opening and hydraulic conductivity of rock discontinuities. The 23rd U.S Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Berkeley: California

[15] Dang W, Wu W H K, Konietzky H, Qian J (2019). Effect of shear-induced aperture evolution on fluid flow in rock fractures.Comput Geotech, 114: 103152

[16] Foias C, Manley O, Rosa R, Temam R (2002). Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence.Phys Today, 55(10): 54–56

[17] Ge Y, Kulatilake P H S W, Tang H, Xiong C (2014). Investigation of natural rock joint roughness.Comput Geotech, 55: 290–305

[18] Ge Z, Yuan T, Li Y (2019). Numerical study on the mechanism of fluid flow through single rough fractures with different JRC. Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 49(1): 1–10

[19] Gong F C, Guo T K, Sun W, Li Z M, Yang B, Chen Y M, Qu Z Q (2020). Evaluation of geothermal energy extraction in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) with multiple fracturing horizontal wells (MFHW).Renew Energy, 151: 1339–1351

[20] Guo T K, Zhang Y L, He J Y, Gong F C, Chen M, Liu X Q (2021). Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in north China oilfield.Renew Energy, 177: 1–12

[21] Hakami E (1995). Aperture distribution of rock fractures. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology

[22] Hou J C, Cao M C, Liu P K (2018). Development and utilization of geothermal energy in China: current practices and future strategies.Renew Energy, 125: 401–412

[23] Huang N, Liu R C, Jiang Y J (2017). Numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of 3D self-affine rough fractures during shear.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 45: 127–142

[24] Huang N, Liu R C, Jiang Y J, Cheng Y, Li B (2019). Shear-flow coupling characteristics of a three-dimensional discrete fracture network-fault model considering stress-induced aperture variations.J Hydrol (Amst), 571: 416–424

[25] Javadi M, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Mitani Y (2014). Critical Reynolds number for nonlinear flow through rough-walled fractures: the role of shear processes.Water Resour Res, 50(2): 1789–1804

[26] Ju Y, Dong J B, Gao F, Wang J G (2019). Evaluation of water permeability of rough fractures based on a self-affine fractal model and optimized segmentation algorithm.Adv Water Resour, 129: 99–111

[27] Kim J, Cho W, Chung I M, Heo J H (2007). On the stochastic simulation procedure of estimating critical hydraulic gradient for gas storage in unlined rock caverns.Geosci J, 11(3): 249–258

[28] Kulatilake P H S W, Balasingam P, Park J, Morgan R (2006). Natural rock joint roughness quantification through fractal techniques.Geotech Geol Eng, 24(5): 1181–1202

[29] Kumari W G P, Ranjith P G (2019). Sustainable development of enhanced geothermal systems based on geotechnical research – a review.Earth Sci Rev, 199: 102955

[30] LawrenceJ (1993). Introduction to Neural Networks. California Scientific Software

[31] Li B, Jiang Y (2013). Quantitative estimation of fluid flow mechanism in rock fracture taking into account the influences of JRC and Reynolds number. J Min Mater Process Inst Jpn, 129 (7): 479–484 (in Japanese)

[32] Li B, Li Y, Zhao Z, Liu R (2019). A mechanical-hydraulic-solute transport model for rough-walled rock fractures subjected to shear under constant normal stiffness conditions.J Hydrol (Amst), 579: 124153

[33] Li B, Liu R, Jiang Y (2016a). Influences of hydraulic gradient, surface roughness, intersecting angle, and scale effect on nonlinear flow behavior at single fracture intersections.J Hydrol (Amst), 538: 440–453

[34] Li J L, Li X H, Zhang B, Sui B, Wang P C, Zhang M (2021). Effect of lower surface roughness on nonlinear hydraulic properties of fractures.Geofluids, 2021: 6612378

[35] Li X, Feng Z J, Han G, Elsworth D, Marone C, Saffer D, Cheon D S (2016b). Breakdown pressure and fracture surface morphology of hydraulic fracturing in shale with H₂O, CO₂ and N₂.Geomechanics Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour, 2(2): 63–76

[36] Liu E (2005). Effects of fracture aperture and roughness on hydraulic and mechanical properties of rocks: implication of seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs.J Geophys Eng, 2(1): 38–47

[37] Liu H H, Bodvarsson G S, Lu S L, Molz F J (2004). A corrected and generalized successive random additions algorithm for simulating fractional levy motions.Math Geol, 36(3): 361–378

[38] Liu H H, Molz F J (1996). Discrimination of fractional Brownian movement and fractional Gaussian noise structures in permeability and related property distributions with range analyses.Water Resour Res, 32(8): 2601–2605

[39] Liu J W, Wei K H, Xu S W, Cui J, Ma J, Xiao X L, Xi B D, He X S (2021a). Surfactant-enhanced remediation of oil-contaminated soil and groundwater: a review.Sci Total Environ, 756: 144142

[40] Liu R C, He M, Huang N, Jiang Y J, Yu L Y (2020). Three-dimensional double-rough-walled modeling of fluid flow through self-affine shear fractures.J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 12(1): 41–49

[41] Liu R C, Jiang Y J, Li B (2016c). Effects of intersection and dead-end of fractures on nonlinear flow and particle transport in rock fracture networks.Geosci J, 20(3): 415–426

[42] Liu R C, Jing H W, Li X Z, Yin Q, Xu Z G, He M, Taylor T (2021b). An experimental study on fractal pore size distribution and hydro-mechanical properties of granites after high temperature treatment.Fractals, 29(4): 1–13

[43] Liu R C, Li B, Jiang Y J (2016a). Critical hydraulic gradient for nonlinear flow through rock fracture networks: the roles of aperture, surface roughness, and number of intersections.Adv Water Resour, 88: 53–65

[44] Liu R C, Wang Y S, Li B, Jing H W, Li S C, Yang H Q (2022). Linear and nonlinear fluid flow responses of connected fractures subject to shearing under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness boundary conditions.Comput Geotech, 141: 104517

[45] Liu R, Jiang Y, Li B, Wang X (2015). A fractal model for characterizing fluid flow in fractured rock masses based on randomly distributed rock fracture networks.Comput Geotech, 65: 45–55

[46] Liu R, Li B, Jiang Y (2016b). Critical hydraulic gradient for nonlinear flow through rock fracture networks: the roles of aperture, surface roughness, and number of intersections.Adv Water Resour, 88(Feb): 53–65

[47] Liu R, Yu L, Jiang Y (2017). Quantitative estimates of normalized transmissivity and the onset of nonlinear fluid flow through rough rock fractures.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 50: 1063–1071

[48] Lomize G (1951). Flow in Fractured Rock. Moscow: Gosemergoizdat, 127–129 (in Russian)

[49] Louis C, Maini Y (1969). Determination of in-situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock.International Society of Rock Mechanics Proceedings, 1: 1–19

[50] Matsuki K, Kimura Y, Sakaguchi K, Kizaki A, Giwelli A (2010). Effect of shear displacement on the hydraulic conductivity of a fracture.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 47(3): 436e449

[51] McCulloch W S, Pitts W (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.Bull Math Biophys, 5(4): 115–133

[52] Myers N O (1962). Characterization of surface roughness.Wear, 5(3): 182–189

[53] Nowamooz A, Radilla G, Fourar M (2009). Non-Darcian two-phase flow in a transparent replica of a rough-walled rock fracture.Water Resour Res, 45(7): W07406

[54] Odling N E (1994). Natural fracture profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 27(3): 135–153

[55] Olsson R, Barton N (2001). An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 38(3): 317–329

[56] Patir N, Cheng H S (1978). An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 100(1): 12–17

[57] Power W L, Tullis T E (1991). Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 28(6): A344

[58] Rasouli V, Hosseinian A (2011). Correlations developed for estimation of hydraulic parameters of rough fractures through the simulation of JRC flow channels.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 44(4): 447–461

[59] Renshaw C E (1995). On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures.J Geophys Res, 100(B12): 24629–24636

[60] Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J (1986). Learning representations by back propagating errors.Nature, 323(6088): 533–536

[61] Scesi L, Gattinoni P (2007). Roughness control on hydraulic conductivity in fractured rocks.Hydrogeol J, 15(2): 201–211

[62] Schmidhuber J (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.Neural Netw, 61: 85–117

[63] Schmittbuhl J, Steyer A, Jouniaux L, Toussaint R (2008). Fracture morphology and viscous transport.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 45(3): 422–430

[64] Snow D T (1970). The frequency and apertures of fractures in rock.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 7(1): 23–40

[65] Sun Z H, Wang L Q, Zhou J Q, Wang C S (2020). A new method for determining the hydraulic aperture of rough rock fractures using the support vector regression.Eng Geol, 271: 105618

[66] Tan J, Rong G, Zhan H B, He R H, Sha S, Li B W (2020). An innovative method to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of a single rock fracture based on geometric characteristics.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 53(10): 4767–4786

[67] TsangY W, Witherspoon P A (1981). Hydromechanical behavior of a deformable rock fracture subject to normal stress. J Geophys Res, 86(B10 NB10): 9287–9298 10.1029/JB086iB10p09287

[68] Tse R, Cruden D M (1979). Estimating joint roughness coefficients.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 16(5): 303–307

[69] Waite M E, Ge S, Spetzler H (1999). A new conceptual model for fluid flow in discrete fractures: an experimental and numerical study.J Geophys Res, 104: 13049–13059

[70] Walsh J (1981). Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 18(5): 429–435

[71] Wang L C, Cardenas M B (2014). Non-Fickian transport through two-dimensional rough fractures: assessment and prediction.Water Resour Res, 50(2): 871–884

[72] Wang L C, Cardenas M B, Slottke D T, Ketcham R A, Sharp J M Jr (2015a). Modification of the Local Cubic Law of fracture flow for weak inertia, tortuosity, and roughness.Water Resour Res, 51(4): 2064–2080

[73] Wang L, Tian Y, Yu X Y, Wang C, Yao B W, Wang S H, Winterfeld P H, Wang X, Yang Z Z, Wang Y H, Cui J Y, Wu Y S (2017). Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs.Fuel, 210: 425–445

[74] Wang M, Chen Y F, Ma G W, Zhou J Q, Zhou C B (2016). Influence of surface roughness on nonlinear flow behaviors in 3D self-affine rough fractures: Lattice Boltzmann simulations.Adv Water Resour, 96: 373–388

[75] Wang Y K, Zhang Z Y, Liu X Q, Xue K S (2023). Relative permeability of two-phase fluid flow through rough fractures: the roles of fracture roughness and confining pressure.Adv Water Resour, 175: 104426

[76] Wang Z C, Li S C, Qiao L P, Zhang Q S (2015b). Finite element analysis of the hydro-mechanical behavior of an underground crude oil storage facility in granite subject to cyclic loading during operation.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 73: 70–81

[77] Witherspoon P A, Wang J S Y, Iwai K, Gale J E (1980). Validity of cubic law for fluid-flow in a deformable rock fracture.Water Resour Res, 16(6): 1016–1024

[78] Wu Z H, Pan S R, Chen F W, Long G D, Zhang C Q, Yu P S (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks.IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 32(1): 4–24

[79] Xie L Z, Gao C, Ren L, Li C B (2015). Numerical investigation of geometrical and hydraulic properties in a single rock fracture during shear displacement with the Navier-Stokes equations.Environ Earth Sci, 73(11): 7061–7074

[80] Xiong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C (2011). Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48: 1292–1302

[81] Xiong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C (2013). Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear.Seismic Safety Evaluation of Concrete Dams, 22: 513–538

[82] Yang Z Y, Lo S C, Di C C (2001). Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z₂.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 34(3): 243–251

[83] Ye Z, Liu H H, Jiang Q, Zhou C (2015). Two-phase flow properties of a horizontal fracture: the effect of aperture distribution.Adv Water Resour, 76(feb): 43–54

[84] Yeo I W, de Freitas M H, Zimmerman R W (1998). Effect of shear displacement on the aperture and permeability of a rock fracture.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 35(8): 1051–1070

[85] Yin Q, Ma G W, Jing H W, Wang H D, Su H J, Wang Y C, Liu R C (2017). Hydraulic properties of 3D rough-walled fractures during shearing: an experimental study.J Hydrol (Amst), 555: 169–184

[86] Yin Q, Nie X X, Wu J Y, Wang Q, Bian K Q, Jing H W (2023). Experimental study on unloading induced shear performances of 3D saw-tooth rock fractures.Int J Min Sci Technol, 33(4): 463–479

[87] Yu L, Zhang J, Liu R C, Li S C, Liu D, Wang X L (2022). Estimation of the representative elementary volume of three-dimensional fracture networks based on permeability and trace map analysis: a case study.Eng Geol, 309: 106848

[88] Zhang Y, Chai J R (2020). Effect of surface morphology on fluid flow in rough fractures: a review.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 79: 103343

[89] Zhao X, Liu W, Cai Z Q, Han B, Qian T W, Zhao D Y (2016). An overview of preparation and applications of stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles for soil and groundwater remediation.Water Res, 100: 245–266

[90] Zhao Y L, Zhang L Y, Wang W J, Tang J Z, Lin H, Wan W (2017). Transient pulse test and morphological analysis of single rock fractures.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 91: 139–154

[91] Zimmerman R W, Bodvarsson G S (1996). Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures.Transp Porous Media, 23(1): 1–30

[92] Zou L C, Jing L, Cvetkovic V (2015). Roughness decomposition and nonlinear fluid flow in a single rock fracture.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 75: 102–118

[93] Zou L C, Jing L, Cvetkovic V (2017). Shear-enhanced nonlinear flow in rough-walled rock fractures.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 97: 33–45

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press