A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations

Ziheng HUANG, Zheng RUAN, Debin SU

PDF(5992 KB)
PDF(5992 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 279-295. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-022-1076-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The growth and breakup processes of raindrops within a cloud influence the rain intensity and the sizes of raindrops on the surface. The Doppler velocity spectrum acquired by a vertically pointing radar (VPR) contains information on atmospheric turbulence and the size classification of falling hydrometeors. In this study, the four types of Convective Cells (CC) during precipitation events with more than 700 mm of precipitation in southern China are described. The characteristics of four types of CCs correspond to the isolated convection, the early stage, the mature stage, and the decline stage of organizational convection, in that order. Microphysical analysis using retrieval of vertical air motion (Vair) and raindrop evolution in clouds from Doppler velocity spectra collected by C-band VPR revealed the growth and breakup of falling raindrops with dynamic impact. Larger raindrops appear in the early stages and are accompanied by ice particles, which are impacted by the falling path᾽s downdraft. Raindrop aggregation, which is primarily related to the alternation of updraft and downdraft, accounts for the mature stage᾽s high efficiency of surface rainfall. The CCs in the decline stage originate from the shallow uplift in the weak and broad downdraft under conditions of enough water vapor. The updraft dominates the stage of isolated convection. Observations of convective cells could be more accurately represented in model evaluations.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cloud microphysics / convective systems / convective cell / vertically pointing radar observations / Doppler velocity spectrum

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ziheng HUANG, Zheng RUAN, Debin SU. A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations. Front. Earth Sci., 2024, 18(2): 279‒295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1076-0

References

[1]
Ahmed F, Schumacher C, Feng Z, Hagos S (2016). A retrieval of tropical latent heating using the 3D structure of precipitation features.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 55(9): 1965–1982
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Albrecht B A (1989). Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness.Science, 245(4923): 1227–1230
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Atlas D, Srivastava R C, Sekhon R S (1973). Doppler radar characteristics of precipitation at vertical incidence.Rev Geophys, 11(1): 1–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Babb D M, Verlinde J, Albrecht B A (1999). Retrieval of cloud microphysical parameters from 94-GHz radar Doppler power spectra.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 16(5): 489–503
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Beauchamp R M, Chandrasekar V, Chen H, Vega M (2015). Overview of the D3R observations during the IFloodS Field experiment with emphasis on rainfall mapping and microphysics.J Hydrometeorol, 16(5): 2118–2132
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bouniol D, Roca R, Fiolleau T, Poan D E (2016). Macrophysical, microphysical, and radiative properties of tropical mesoscale convective systems over their life cycle.J Clim, 29(9): 3353–3371
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Carr N, Kirstetter P E, Gourley J J, Hong Y (2017). Polarimetric signatures of midlatitude warm-rain precipitation events.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 56(3): 697–711
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen B, Hu W, Pu J (2011). Characteristics of the raindrop size distribution for freezing precipitation observed in southern China.J Geophys Res, 116(D6): D06201
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Dziekan P, Pawlowska H (2017). Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics.Atmos Chem Phys, 17(22): 13509–13520
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ecklund W L, Williams C R, Johnston P E, Gage K S (1999). A 3-GHz profiler for precipitating cloud studies.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 16(3): 309–322
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Fabry F, Zawadzki I (1995). Long-term radar observations of the melting layer of precipitation and their interpretation.J Atmos Sci, 52(7): 838–851
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Finlon J A, McMurdie L A, Chase R J (2022). Investigation of microphysical properties within regions of enhanced dual-frequency ratio during the IMPACTS field campaign.J Atmos Sci, 79(10): 2773–2795
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Fu Y, Liu G (2001). The variability of tropical precipitation profiles and its impact on microwave brightness temperatures as inferred from TRMM data.J Appl Meteorol, 40(12): 2130–2143
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Ghate V P, Cadeddu M P, Zheng X, O’Connor E (2021). Turbulence in the marine boundary layer and air motions below stratocumulus clouds at the ARM eastern North Atlantic site.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 60(10): 1495–1510
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Hagos S, Zhang C, Tao W, Lang S, Takayabu Y N, Shige S, Katsumata M, Olson B, L’Ecuyer T (2010). Estimates of tropical diabatic heating profiles: commonalities and uncertainties.J Clim, 23(3): 542–558
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Harris D, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Droegemeier K K, Levit J J (2001). Multiscale statistical properties of a high-resolution precipitation forecast.J Hydrometeorol, 2(4): 406–418
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Hartmann D L (2016). Tropical anvil clouds and climate sensitivity.Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113(32): 8897–8899
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
He L, Chen T, Kong Q (2016). A review of studies on prefrontal torrential rain in South China.J Appl Meteor Sci, 27(5): 559–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hirose M, Nakamura K (2004). Spatiotemporal variation of the vertical gradient of rainfall rate observed by the TRMM precipitation radar.J Clim, 17(17): 3378–3397
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Houze R A (2014). Cloud Dynamics. New York: Academic Press
[21]
Houze R A Jr (1989). Observed structure of mesoscale convective systems and implications for large-scale heating.Q J R Meteorol Soc, 115(487): 425–461
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Houze R A Jr (2018). 100 Years of Research on Mesoscale Convective Systems.Meteorological Monographs, 59: 17.1–17.54
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Johnston P E, Williams C R, White A B (2022). Rain drop size distributions estimated from NOAA snow-level radar data.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 39(3): 353–366
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Khain A, Pinsky M, Korolev A (2022). Combined effect of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen mechanism and large eddies on microphysics of mixed-phase stratiform clouds.J Atmos Sci, 79(2): 383–407
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Kirankumar N V P, Rao T N, Radhakrishna B, Rao D N (2008). Statistical characteristics of raindrop size distribution in southwest monsoon season.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(2): 576–590
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Kober K, Foerster A M, Craig G C (2015). Examination of a stochastic and deterministic convection parameterization in the COSMO model.Mon Weather Rev, 143(10): 4088–4103
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Konwar M, Das S, Deshpande S, Chakravarty K, Goswami B (2014). Microphysics of clouds and rain over the Western Ghat.J Geophys Res Atmos, 119(10): 6140–6159
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Lim K S S, Hong S Y (2010). Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models.Mon Weather Rev, 138(5): 1587–1612
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Liu C, Zipser E J (2013). Why does radar reflectivity tend to increase downward toward the ocean surface, but decrease downward toward the land surface?.J Geophys Res Atmos, 118(1): 135–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Marion G R, Trapp R J (2019). The dynamical coupling of convective updrafts, downdrafts, and cold pools in simulated supercell thunderstorms.J Geophys Res Atmo, 124(2): 664–683
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
May P T, Keenan T D (2005). Evaluation of microphysical retrievals from polarimetric radar with wind profiler data.J Appl Meteorol, 44(6): 827–838
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Meneghini R, Liao L, Iguchi T (2022). A generalized dual-frequency ratio (DFR) approach for rain retrievals.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 39(9): 1309–1329
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Morrison H, van Lier-Walqui M, Fridlind A M, Grabowski W W, Harrington J Y, Hoose C, Korolev A, Kumjian M R, Milbrandt J A, Pawlowska H, Posselt D J, Prat O P, Reimel K J, Shima S, Diedenhoven B V, Xue L (2020). Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics.J Adv Model Earth Systems, 12: e2019MS001689
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Munchak S J, Tokay A (2008). Retrieval of raindrop size distribution from simulated dual-frequency radar measurements.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(1): 223–239
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Narayanan V (1967). Radar observation of a monsoon rain squall at Bombay.Mausam (New Delhi), 18(3): 397–402
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Pang S, Ruan Z, Yang L, Liu X, Huo Z, Li F, Ge R (2021). Estimating raindrop size distributions and vertical air motions with spectral difference using vertically pointing radar.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 38(10): 1697–1713
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Parker M D, Johnson R H (2000). Organizational modes of midlatitude mesoscale convective systems.Mon Weather Rev, 128(10): 3413–3436
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Petitdidier M, Sy A, Garrouste J, Delcourt J (1997). Statistical characteristics of the noise power spectral density in UHF and VHF wind profilers.Radio Sci, 32(3): 1229–1247
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Rajopadhyaya D K, May P T, Cifelli R C, Avery S K, Willams C R, Ecklund W L, Gage K S (1998). The effect of vertical air motions on rain rates and median volume diameter determined from combined UHF and VHF wind profiler measurements and comparisons with rain gauge measurements.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 15(6): 1306–1319
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Rauber R M, Tokay A (1991). An explanation for the existence of supercooled water at the top of cold clouds.J Atmos Sci, 48(8): 1005–1023
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Raut B A, Konwar M, Murugavel P, Kadge D, Gurnule D, Sayyed I, Todekar K, Malap N, Bankar S, Prabhakaran T (2021). Microphysical origin of raindrop size distributions during the Indian monsoon.Geophys Res Lett, 48: e2021GL093581
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Rosenfeld D, Lohmann U, Raga G B, O’Dowd C D, Kulmala M, Fuzzi S, Reissell A, Andreae M O (2008). Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect precipitation?.Science, 321(5894): 1309–1313
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Rutledge S A, Houze R A Jr (1987). A diagnostic modelling study of the trailing stratiform region of a Midlatitude Squall Line.J Atmos Sci, 44(18): 2640–2656
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Ryu J, Song H J, Sohn B J, Liu C (2021). Global distribution of three types of drop size distribution representing heavy rainfall from GPM/DPR measurements.Geophy Res Lett, 48: e2020GL090871
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Saikranthi K, Narayana Rao T, Radhakrishna B, Rao S (2014). Morphology of the vertical structure of precipitation over India and adjoining oceans based on long-term measurements of TRMM PR.J Geophys Res Atmos, 119(13): 8433–8449
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Shupe M D, Kollias P, Persson P O G, McFarquhar G M (2008). Vertical motions in arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds.J Atmos Sci, 65(4): 1304–1322
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Surcel M, Zawadzki I, Yau M K, Xue M, Kong F (2017). More on the scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation patterns: extension to the 2009–13 CAPS spring experiment ensemble forecasts.Mon Weather Rev, 145(9): 3625–3646
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Thomas A, Kanawade V P, Chakravarty K, Srivastava A K (2021). Characterization of raindrop size distributions and its response to cloud microphysical properties.Atmos Res, 249: 105292
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Utsav B, Deshpande S M, Das S K, Pandithurai G (2017). Statistical characteristics of convective clouds over the Western Ghats derived from weather radar observations.J Geophys Res Atmos, 122(18): 10050–10076
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Vivekanandan J, Ghate V P, Jensen J B, Ellis S M, Schwartz M C (2020). A technique for estimating liquid droplet diameter and liquid water content in stratocumulus clouds using radar and lidar measurements.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 37(11): 2145–2161
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Wang D, Giangrande S E, Feng Z, Hardin J C, Prein A F (2020). Updraft and downdraft core size and intensity as revealed by radar wind profilers: MCS observations and idealized model comparisons.J Geophys Res: Atmosph, 125: e2019JD031774
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Wang D, Giangrande S E, Schiro K, Jensen M P, Houze R A Jr (2019). The characteristics of tropical and midlatitude mesoscale convective systems as revealed by radar wind profilers.J Geophys Res Atmos, 124(8): 4601–4619
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Williams C R, Beauchamp R M, Chandrasekar V (2016). Vertical air motions and raindrop size distributions estimated using mean Doppler velocity difference from 3- and 35-GHz vertically pointing radars.IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 54(10): 6048–6060
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Willis P T (1984). Functional fits to some observed drop size distributions and parameterization of rain.J Atmos Sci, 41(9): 1648–1661
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Xu Z, Fu C, Qian Y (2009). Relative roles of land–sea distribution and orography in Asian monsoon intensity.J Atmos Sci, 66(9): 2714–2729
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Yang X, Fei J, Huang X, Cheng X, Carvalho L M V, He H (2015). Characteristics of mesoscale convective systems over China and its vicinity using geostationary satellite FY2.J Clim, 28(12): 4890–4907
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Yano J I, Plant R S (2015). Chapter 11: Closure. In: Plant R Sand Yano J I, Eds. Parameterization of Atmospheric Convection, Vol. 1. World Scientific, 325–401
[58]
Yeung N K H, Sherwood S C, Protat A, Lane T P, Williams C (2021). A doppler radar study of convective draft lengths over Darwin, Australia.Mon Weather Rev, 149(9): 2965–2974
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Zeng Z, Wang D, Chen Y (2021). An investigation of convective features and Z-R relationships for a local extreme precipitation event.Atmos Res, 250: 105372
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Zhang G, Sun J, Brandes E A (2006). Improving parameterization of rain microphysics with disdrometer and radar observations.J Atmos Sci, 63(4): 1273–1290
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Zhang G, Xue M, Cao Q, Dawson D (2008). Diagnosing the intercept parameter for exponential raindrop size distribution based on video disdrometer observations: model development.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(11): 2983–2992
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Zipser E J (1977). Mesoscale and convective–scale downdrafts as distinct components of squall-line structure.Mon Weather Rev, 105(12): 1568–1589
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41975046), the Basic Research Fund of CAMS (No. 2023Z008) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1501703).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5992 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/