A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations

Ziheng HUANG , Zheng RUAN , Debin SU

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 279 -295.

PDF (5992KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 279 -295. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-022-1076-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations

Author information +
History +
PDF (5992KB)

Abstract

The growth and breakup processes of raindrops within a cloud influence the rain intensity and the sizes of raindrops on the surface. The Doppler velocity spectrum acquired by a vertically pointing radar (VPR) contains information on atmospheric turbulence and the size classification of falling hydrometeors. In this study, the four types of Convective Cells (CC) during precipitation events with more than 700 mm of precipitation in southern China are described. The characteristics of four types of CCs correspond to the isolated convection, the early stage, the mature stage, and the decline stage of organizational convection, in that order. Microphysical analysis using retrieval of vertical air motion (Vair) and raindrop evolution in clouds from Doppler velocity spectra collected by C-band VPR revealed the growth and breakup of falling raindrops with dynamic impact. Larger raindrops appear in the early stages and are accompanied by ice particles, which are impacted by the falling path᾽s downdraft. Raindrop aggregation, which is primarily related to the alternation of updraft and downdraft, accounts for the mature stage᾽s high efficiency of surface rainfall. The CCs in the decline stage originate from the shallow uplift in the weak and broad downdraft under conditions of enough water vapor. The updraft dominates the stage of isolated convection. Observations of convective cells could be more accurately represented in model evaluations.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cloud microphysics / convective systems / convective cell / vertically pointing radar observations / Doppler velocity spectrum

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ziheng HUANG, Zheng RUAN, Debin SU. A microphysical investigation of different convective cells during the precipitation event with sustained high-resolution observations. Front. Earth Sci., 2024, 18(2): 279-295 DOI:10.1007/s11707-022-1076-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmed F, Schumacher C, Feng Z, Hagos S (2016). A retrieval of tropical latent heating using the 3D structure of precipitation features.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 55(9): 1965–1982

[2]

Albrecht B A (1989). Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness.Science, 245(4923): 1227–1230

[3]

Atlas D, Srivastava R C, Sekhon R S (1973). Doppler radar characteristics of precipitation at vertical incidence.Rev Geophys, 11(1): 1–35

[4]

Babb D M, Verlinde J, Albrecht B A (1999). Retrieval of cloud microphysical parameters from 94-GHz radar Doppler power spectra.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 16(5): 489–503

[5]

Beauchamp R M, Chandrasekar V, Chen H, Vega M (2015). Overview of the D3R observations during the IFloodS Field experiment with emphasis on rainfall mapping and microphysics.J Hydrometeorol, 16(5): 2118–2132

[6]

Bouniol D, Roca R, Fiolleau T, Poan D E (2016). Macrophysical, microphysical, and radiative properties of tropical mesoscale convective systems over their life cycle.J Clim, 29(9): 3353–3371

[7]

Carr N, Kirstetter P E, Gourley J J, Hong Y (2017). Polarimetric signatures of midlatitude warm-rain precipitation events.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 56(3): 697–711

[8]

Chen B, Hu W, Pu J (2011). Characteristics of the raindrop size distribution for freezing precipitation observed in southern China.J Geophys Res, 116(D6): D06201

[9]

Dziekan P, Pawlowska H (2017). Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics.Atmos Chem Phys, 17(22): 13509–13520

[10]

Ecklund W L, Williams C R, Johnston P E, Gage K S (1999). A 3-GHz profiler for precipitating cloud studies.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 16(3): 309–322

[11]

Fabry F, Zawadzki I (1995). Long-term radar observations of the melting layer of precipitation and their interpretation.J Atmos Sci, 52(7): 838–851

[12]

Finlon J A, McMurdie L A, Chase R J (2022). Investigation of microphysical properties within regions of enhanced dual-frequency ratio during the IMPACTS field campaign.J Atmos Sci, 79(10): 2773–2795

[13]

Fu Y, Liu G (2001). The variability of tropical precipitation profiles and its impact on microwave brightness temperatures as inferred from TRMM data.J Appl Meteorol, 40(12): 2130–2143

[14]

Ghate V P, Cadeddu M P, Zheng X, O’Connor E (2021). Turbulence in the marine boundary layer and air motions below stratocumulus clouds at the ARM eastern North Atlantic site.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 60(10): 1495–1510

[15]

Hagos S, Zhang C, Tao W, Lang S, Takayabu Y N, Shige S, Katsumata M, Olson B, L’Ecuyer T (2010). Estimates of tropical diabatic heating profiles: commonalities and uncertainties.J Clim, 23(3): 542–558

[16]

Harris D, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Droegemeier K K, Levit J J (2001). Multiscale statistical properties of a high-resolution precipitation forecast.J Hydrometeorol, 2(4): 406–418

[17]

Hartmann D L (2016). Tropical anvil clouds and climate sensitivity.Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113(32): 8897–8899

[18]

He L, Chen T, Kong Q (2016). A review of studies on prefrontal torrential rain in South China.J Appl Meteor Sci, 27(5): 559–569

[19]

Hirose M, Nakamura K (2004). Spatiotemporal variation of the vertical gradient of rainfall rate observed by the TRMM precipitation radar.J Clim, 17(17): 3378–3397

[20]

Houze R A (2014). Cloud Dynamics. New York: Academic Press

[21]

Houze R A Jr (1989). Observed structure of mesoscale convective systems and implications for large-scale heating.Q J R Meteorol Soc, 115(487): 425–461

[22]

Houze R A Jr (2018). 100 Years of Research on Mesoscale Convective Systems.Meteorological Monographs, 59: 17.1–17.54

[23]

Johnston P E, Williams C R, White A B (2022). Rain drop size distributions estimated from NOAA snow-level radar data.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 39(3): 353–366

[24]

Khain A, Pinsky M, Korolev A (2022). Combined effect of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen mechanism and large eddies on microphysics of mixed-phase stratiform clouds.J Atmos Sci, 79(2): 383–407

[25]

Kirankumar N V P, Rao T N, Radhakrishna B, Rao D N (2008). Statistical characteristics of raindrop size distribution in southwest monsoon season.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(2): 576–590

[26]

Kober K, Foerster A M, Craig G C (2015). Examination of a stochastic and deterministic convection parameterization in the COSMO model.Mon Weather Rev, 143(10): 4088–4103

[27]

Konwar M, Das S, Deshpande S, Chakravarty K, Goswami B (2014). Microphysics of clouds and rain over the Western Ghat.J Geophys Res Atmos, 119(10): 6140–6159

[28]

Lim K S S, Hong S Y (2010). Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models.Mon Weather Rev, 138(5): 1587–1612

[29]

Liu C, Zipser E J (2013). Why does radar reflectivity tend to increase downward toward the ocean surface, but decrease downward toward the land surface?.J Geophys Res Atmos, 118(1): 135–148

[30]

Marion G R, Trapp R J (2019). The dynamical coupling of convective updrafts, downdrafts, and cold pools in simulated supercell thunderstorms.J Geophys Res Atmo, 124(2): 664–683

[31]

May P T, Keenan T D (2005). Evaluation of microphysical retrievals from polarimetric radar with wind profiler data.J Appl Meteorol, 44(6): 827–838

[32]

Meneghini R, Liao L, Iguchi T (2022). A generalized dual-frequency ratio (DFR) approach for rain retrievals.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 39(9): 1309–1329

[33]

Morrison H, van Lier-Walqui M, Fridlind A M, Grabowski W W, Harrington J Y, Hoose C, Korolev A, Kumjian M R, Milbrandt J A, Pawlowska H, Posselt D J, Prat O P, Reimel K J, Shima S, Diedenhoven B V, Xue L (2020). Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics.J Adv Model Earth Systems, 12: e2019MS001689

[34]

Munchak S J, Tokay A (2008). Retrieval of raindrop size distribution from simulated dual-frequency radar measurements.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(1): 223–239

[35]

Narayanan V (1967). Radar observation of a monsoon rain squall at Bombay.Mausam (New Delhi), 18(3): 397–402

[36]

Pang S, Ruan Z, Yang L, Liu X, Huo Z, Li F, Ge R (2021). Estimating raindrop size distributions and vertical air motions with spectral difference using vertically pointing radar.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 38(10): 1697–1713

[37]

Parker M D, Johnson R H (2000). Organizational modes of midlatitude mesoscale convective systems.Mon Weather Rev, 128(10): 3413–3436

[38]

Petitdidier M, Sy A, Garrouste J, Delcourt J (1997). Statistical characteristics of the noise power spectral density in UHF and VHF wind profilers.Radio Sci, 32(3): 1229–1247

[39]

Rajopadhyaya D K, May P T, Cifelli R C, Avery S K, Willams C R, Ecklund W L, Gage K S (1998). The effect of vertical air motions on rain rates and median volume diameter determined from combined UHF and VHF wind profiler measurements and comparisons with rain gauge measurements.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 15(6): 1306–1319

[40]

Rauber R M, Tokay A (1991). An explanation for the existence of supercooled water at the top of cold clouds.J Atmos Sci, 48(8): 1005–1023

[41]

Raut B A, Konwar M, Murugavel P, Kadge D, Gurnule D, Sayyed I, Todekar K, Malap N, Bankar S, Prabhakaran T (2021). Microphysical origin of raindrop size distributions during the Indian monsoon.Geophys Res Lett, 48: e2021GL093581

[42]

Rosenfeld D, Lohmann U, Raga G B, O’Dowd C D, Kulmala M, Fuzzi S, Reissell A, Andreae M O (2008). Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect precipitation?.Science, 321(5894): 1309–1313

[43]

Rutledge S A, Houze R A Jr (1987). A diagnostic modelling study of the trailing stratiform region of a Midlatitude Squall Line.J Atmos Sci, 44(18): 2640–2656

[44]

Ryu J, Song H J, Sohn B J, Liu C (2021). Global distribution of three types of drop size distribution representing heavy rainfall from GPM/DPR measurements.Geophy Res Lett, 48: e2020GL090871

[45]

Saikranthi K, Narayana Rao T, Radhakrishna B, Rao S (2014). Morphology of the vertical structure of precipitation over India and adjoining oceans based on long-term measurements of TRMM PR.J Geophys Res Atmos, 119(13): 8433–8449

[46]

Shupe M D, Kollias P, Persson P O G, McFarquhar G M (2008). Vertical motions in arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds.J Atmos Sci, 65(4): 1304–1322

[47]

Surcel M, Zawadzki I, Yau M K, Xue M, Kong F (2017). More on the scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation patterns: extension to the 2009–13 CAPS spring experiment ensemble forecasts.Mon Weather Rev, 145(9): 3625–3646

[48]

Thomas A, Kanawade V P, Chakravarty K, Srivastava A K (2021). Characterization of raindrop size distributions and its response to cloud microphysical properties.Atmos Res, 249: 105292

[49]

Utsav B, Deshpande S M, Das S K, Pandithurai G (2017). Statistical characteristics of convective clouds over the Western Ghats derived from weather radar observations.J Geophys Res Atmos, 122(18): 10050–10076

[50]

Vivekanandan J, Ghate V P, Jensen J B, Ellis S M, Schwartz M C (2020). A technique for estimating liquid droplet diameter and liquid water content in stratocumulus clouds using radar and lidar measurements.J Atmos Ocean Technol, 37(11): 2145–2161

[51]

Wang D, Giangrande S E, Feng Z, Hardin J C, Prein A F (2020). Updraft and downdraft core size and intensity as revealed by radar wind profilers: MCS observations and idealized model comparisons.J Geophys Res: Atmosph, 125: e2019JD031774

[52]

Wang D, Giangrande S E, Schiro K, Jensen M P, Houze R A Jr (2019). The characteristics of tropical and midlatitude mesoscale convective systems as revealed by radar wind profilers.J Geophys Res Atmos, 124(8): 4601–4619

[53]

Williams C R, Beauchamp R M, Chandrasekar V (2016). Vertical air motions and raindrop size distributions estimated using mean Doppler velocity difference from 3- and 35-GHz vertically pointing radars.IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 54(10): 6048–6060

[54]

Willis P T (1984). Functional fits to some observed drop size distributions and parameterization of rain.J Atmos Sci, 41(9): 1648–1661

[55]

Xu Z, Fu C, Qian Y (2009). Relative roles of land–sea distribution and orography in Asian monsoon intensity.J Atmos Sci, 66(9): 2714–2729

[56]

Yang X, Fei J, Huang X, Cheng X, Carvalho L M V, He H (2015). Characteristics of mesoscale convective systems over China and its vicinity using geostationary satellite FY2.J Clim, 28(12): 4890–4907

[57]

Yano J I, Plant R S (2015). Chapter 11: Closure. In: Plant R Sand Yano J I, Eds. Parameterization of Atmospheric Convection, Vol. 1. World Scientific, 325–401

[58]

Yeung N K H, Sherwood S C, Protat A, Lane T P, Williams C (2021). A doppler radar study of convective draft lengths over Darwin, Australia.Mon Weather Rev, 149(9): 2965–2974

[59]

Zeng Z, Wang D, Chen Y (2021). An investigation of convective features and Z-R relationships for a local extreme precipitation event.Atmos Res, 250: 105372

[60]

Zhang G, Sun J, Brandes E A (2006). Improving parameterization of rain microphysics with disdrometer and radar observations.J Atmos Sci, 63(4): 1273–1290

[61]

Zhang G, Xue M, Cao Q, Dawson D (2008). Diagnosing the intercept parameter for exponential raindrop size distribution based on video disdrometer observations: model development.J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(11): 2983–2992

[62]

Zipser E J (1977). Mesoscale and convective–scale downdrafts as distinct components of squall-line structure.Mon Weather Rev, 105(12): 1568–1589

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5992KB)

759

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/